The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 23 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
PayU Money se distingue .
roommaster se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Contactless Payments and Payment Tokenization.
Notes comparees basees sur 23 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 23 |
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de traitement des paiements pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | PayU Money |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 6 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 7 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | — | #4 1 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | — | #4 0 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | PayU Money |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #4 7 avis |
| Luxe | — | #5 0 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine | — | #4 1 avis |
| Sejour prolonge | — | #4 0 avis |
Par region
| Segment | PayU Money |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #4 14 avis |
| Europe | — | #5 0 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | — | #3 0 avis |
Your hotel’s choice between PayU Money and roommaster Payments hinges on your specific needs for payment processing. Both tools aim to streamline transactions, but their features, reliability, and user feedback differ sharply. PayU Money, despite its lack of reviews and recent data, is a lesser-known option in your region, while roommaster Payments—backed by a solid 20 recent reviews and a 4.45/5 support rating—offers a more proven track record. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
PayU Money remains largely unreviewed, offering no recent customer feedback, ratings, or a clear market presence, making it difficult to gauge its performance or reliability. Conversely, roommaster Payments boasts 20 recent reviews with an average support score of 4.45/5 and an NPS of 8.4, indicating satisfied hoteliers and more recent validation of its capabilities.
Both products aim to process payments efficiently, but roommaster’s extensive feature set and proven customer satisfaction suggest it’s better suited for hotels seeking reliability. Are you willing to risk an untested solution, or do you prefer a platform with documented hotel experiences?
If your hotel needs a fully integrated, feature-rich payment system that reduces manual work and chargebacks, go with roommaster Payments. Its 13 unique features—like chargeback management, contactless payments, and PCI compliance—make it suitable for mid-sized to large properties seeking operational efficiency.
If your hotel has minimal transaction needs, is experimenting with payment processors, or prioritizes regional presence over proven reviews, PayU Money might seem appealing. But given the lack of recent reviews and market data, roommaster remains the safer bet for most hotels. Which features matter most to your team?
Roommaster Payments scores an impressive 4.4/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its user-friendly interface and straightforward onboarding process. Hoteliers mention their staff find it simple to operate, and support staff are generally helpful, with some noting their team answers questions promptly.
PayU Money, on the other hand, shows no available ratings or reviews, and its untested platform likely lacks the same level of polish. The absence of recent feedback makes it difficult to assess usability, but the lack of support ratings suggests potential hurdles.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments offers 13 distinct features, including refund management, authorization adjustments, contactless payments, tokenization, and PCI compliance—capabilities that are critical for secure and flexible transactions. PayU Money, with no unique features listed, seems to lack the depth that hotel operators increasingly require.
The feature gap indicates roommaster’s system is more suitable for hotels needing advanced payment controls and integrations. If features like chargeback management and flexible deposit scheduling are priorities, roommaster is the clear choice. Edge: roommaster Payments.
Support quality is crucial in payment processing. roommaster Payments boasts a 4.45/5 support rating based on recent reviews, with hoteliers praising their responsiveness and helpfulness. Many reviews mention their team resolving issues swiftly and being accessible when needed.
PayU Money, with no recent reviews or ratings, offers no concrete support data, making it a risky choice if dependable assistance is important for your operations. Given the importance of support in payments, roommaster’s higher support rating is a significant advantage.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments integrates with over 56 verified partners, including well-known systems like Sage, Volo, GuestCentric, and Inntopia, offering extensive options for hotel workflows. Its broad integration base allows for smoother operations across property management, booking engines, and revenue tools.
PayU Money has only one verified partner, Yanolja Cloud Solution, indicating a very limited integration footprint. If your hotel relies on multiple third-party systems, roommaster’s extensive network makes it a more suitable choice. Edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments’s 20 recent reviews and a 4.45/5 support score suggest a generally positive hotel sentiment, especially among boutique and resort hotels. Hoteliers appreciate its ease of use, quick support, and operational features, with reviews highlighting its reliability.
PayU Money, with no recent reviews or ratings, cannot be confidently rated by hoteliers. The absence of validation makes roommaster the safer, more trusted option for most property types.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
PayU Money does not list any pricing details or trial options, which suggests it may operate on a customized or undisclosed basis. In contrast, roommaster Payments charges a straightforward $300 monthly fee, with no additional implementation or setup fees mentioned.
The transparent pricing of roommaster Payments allows hotels to evaluate costs upfront, whereas PayU Money’s unknown pricing makes budgeting difficult. For predictable expenses, roommaster offers clarity.
Not ideal if your hotel needs reliable support, extensive features, or proven performance.
Not ideal if your hotel operates with very minimal transaction volume or prefers a regional, less feature-intensive solution.
The core difference lies in reliability and proven performance. roommaster Payments has a clear edge due to its extensive features, recent positive reviews, and broad integrations, making it suitable for hotels that need dependable, comprehensive payment processing.
Choose roommaster Payments if you value support, features, and proven hotel-specific solutions. Opt for PayU Money only if your hotel operates on a very limited budget, in a region where it’s supported, and if you’re comfortable adopting an unreviewed platform.
For most hotels seeking stability, comprehensive features, and support, roommaster Payments is the safer, smarter investment.
La tarification des Logiciel de traitement des paiements est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| PayU Money |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, PayU et roommaster Payments partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | PayU Money |
|
|---|---|---|
| Accepte les visas | ||
| Ajustements d'autorisation | ||
| Capture partielle | ||
| Fonction de gratuité | ||
| Gestion des remboursements | ||
| Payer par lien |
Affichage des principales differences. 1 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. PayU et roommaster Payments partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Payments Processing Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. PayU propose 1 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que roommaster Payments en propose 56. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. roommaster Payments est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.2/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
PayU : Non. roommaster Payments : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Payments Processing Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. PayU Money a un HT Score de 0 et roommaster a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Recommandations personnalisées adaptées à votre propriété