The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 169 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment Log Reports and Mobile Ordering.
PixelPoint se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 169 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $200/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 169 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 169 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Mews apprecient surtout interface utilisateur et rapports, integration with third-party systems, seamless pms integration, tandis que ceux de PixelPoint mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
PixelPoint |
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Interface utilisateur et rapports
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with Third-Party Systems
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless PMS Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Product Development and Feature Evolution
▾
|
|
|
−
Personnalisation et flexibilité
▾
|
|
|
−
Améliorations opérationnelles
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de point de vente hôteliers pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
PixelPoint |
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #2 44 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #3 94 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #5 7 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #2 9 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
PixelPoint |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #3 74 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 41 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #3 31 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #2 12 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
PixelPoint |
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #3 14 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 130 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique | #5 4 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient | #6 0 avis | — |
Choosing the right hotel POS system can significantly impact operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Both Mews POS and PixelPoint aim to streamline your hotel's restaurant and bar operations, but they do so through different strengths. While PixelPoint emphasizes a broad hospitality focus, Mews POS offers a purpose-built solution with a strong integration backbone. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s specific needs?
Mews POS is designed exclusively for hotels, integrating seamlessly with its property management system (PMS) and offering a unified platform that covers reservations, payments, inventory, and order management. PixelPoint, by contrast, is a more general hospitality POS system tailored for restaurants, cafés, and bars, with less direct hotel-specific integration and a broader industry focus.
Both systems aim to improve transaction speed and accuracy, but Mews POS’s integration with PMS enhances guest billing and operational flow, providing a smoother experience. PixelPoint’s strength lies in its extensive payment options and inventory management, making it suitable for venues with diverse food and beverage outlets but less tailored to hotel environments. Are you looking for a solution built specifically for hotels or one that adapts to more varied hospitality settings?
If your hotel needs a purpose-built, integrated restaurant POS that aligns with your PMS, choose Mews POS. Its compatibility with Mews PMS and dedicated hotel features make it ideal for properties that want to unify front and back-of-house operations, streamline billing, and deliver consistent digital ordering.
On the other hand, if your hotel operates multiple F&B outlets with complex order management, or if your property is part of a hospitality group emphasizing diverse food service environments, PixelPoint’s extensive features for order tracking, employee scheduling, and multiple payment options could be advantageous. However, PixelPoint's limited hotel-specific integrations mean it’s less suited for properties seeking a streamlined hotel-restaurant ecosystem.
Mews POS boasts a user rating of 4.74/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its modern, intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Its cross-device usability allows staff to operate from desktops, tablets, or smartphones, supported by a well-structured onboarding that most users find simple to adopt. Users cite its quick training curve and minimal operational friction, which helps staff focus on guest service.
PixelPoint, by contrast, lacks recent review data, but historically, broad hospitality POS systems tend to have steeper learning curves due to their extensive feature sets. The absence of recent feedback makes it difficult to compare usability directly. Based on current data, edge: Mews POS.
Mews POS offers 29 features exclusive to its platform, including digital menus, online ordering, integrated kitchen displays, mobile ordering, inventory and ingredient management, stock alerts, and detailed reporting tools. These features are tailored for hotel restaurants, with some specifically designed to enhance the guest experience and operational efficiency.
PixelPoint, with no unique features listed, is a comprehensive POS solution supporting order management, inventory, employee scheduling, and multiple payment options. Its flexibility in various hospitality environments is acknowledged, but it lacks the hotel-specific integrations and automation features that Mews POS provides.
Edge: Mews POS, given its tailored features for hotel F&B operations.
Mews POS enjoys a customer support rating of 4.43/5, with reviews praising its reliable and solution-oriented support team. Users mention the onboarding process is well-supported, although some note that initial setup can be complex, with room for improvement in onboarding efficiency.
PixelPoint's support rating is unavailable, and without recent reviews, it’s difficult to assess its support quality. Given Mews’s recent review volume and high satisfaction scores, edge: Mews POS.
Mews POS benefits from a verified partner network of 336 integrations, including channel managers, payment providers, and third-party hospitality tools like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing. This wide connectivity allows your hotel to customize workflows and connect seamlessly with existing systems.
PixelPoint offers no publicly listed integrations, which could limit its ability to connect with other tools. For a hotel seeking an ecosystem that can grow with your operations, Mews POS’s extensive integration options are a clear advantage.
Edge: Mews POS.
Mews, with over 156 recent reviews, has a perfect HT Score of 100 and an overall rating of 0/5 (likely a placeholder, but the positive review signals are strong). Its recent reviews emphasize ease of use, excellent support, and high likelihood to recommend (95%).
PixelPoint lacks recent review data and ratings, making it impossible to gauge current user sentiment. Based on available feedback, hoteliers rate Mews POS much higher. Edge: Mews POS.
Mews POS is priced at a base of $200.00 per month, with no freemium option or implementation fee. Pricing appears predictable, though specific plans may vary depending on property size and needs.
PixelPoint’s pricing is not publicly available, which can complicate budgeting and decision-making. The lack of transparent pricing makes Mews POS the more straightforward choice for hotels needing clear cost expectations.
The core difference lies in specialization: Mews POS is built specifically for hotels, integrating with PMS to unify guest management and F&B operations. PixelPoint offers a broader hospitality solution suitable for varied food service venues but less tailored for hotel-specific workflows.
If your hotel values a purpose-driven system with strong PMS integration, automation, and recent positive reviews, choose Mews POS. Its extensive features, high usability, and proven support make it the clear leader for hotels seeking a comprehensive point-of-sale solution.
Conversely, if your property operates multiple food and beverage outlets with complex needs and less concern for hotel-specific integrations, PixelPoint could suit your operations. However, the lack of recent reviews and limited hotel focus make it less compelling for most hoteliers.
Finally, for properties seeking a scalable, easy-to-adopt POS with proven hotel-specific functionalities and ongoing support, Mews POS is the more reliable choice.
La tarification des Systèmes de point de vente hôteliers est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
PixelPoint | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Mews POS et PixelPoint partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
PixelPoint |
|---|---|---|
| Conforme PCI | ||
| Fractionnement des chèques | ||
| Menus numériques | ||
| Rapports de journal de paiement | ||
| Réductions et promotions | ||
| Vente incitative |
Affichage des principales differences. 17 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"We’ve been with Mews for a few years now and it helped to transform the way we operate. It’s very intuitive to work with and saves our team so much time."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In an industry where human contact is more important than digital contact, having a platform like Mews that not only reduces time at a screen but also gives us more face time with..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Self-check-in kiosks are integral to LyLo's DNA. Coupled with Mews capabilities like guest messaging and online check-out, they form the essence of our guest experience. In fact, t..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
L'interface de Mews est décrite comme moderne et intuitive, facilitant une navigation fluide. Cependant, certains avis suggèrent des améliorations con... L'interface de Mews est décrite comme moderne et intuitive, facilitant une navigation fluide. Cependant, certains avis suggèrent des améliorations concernant la complexité et la flexibilité des outils de reporting, notamment pour les configurations multi-établissements et l'analyse opérationnelle détaillée.
Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centraliz... Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centralized operations, real-time booking management, and accurate financial reporting, although occasional synchronization issues are noted.
Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data... Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data. This integration is praised for improving billing accuracy, reducing departmental friction, and enhancing guest service experience by personalizing interactions.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a... Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a need for more polished features and quicker implementation of user suggestions.
La plateforme est appréciée pour ses options de personnalisation, permettant des flux de travail et des alertes sur mesure afin d'améliorer l'expérien... La plateforme est appréciée pour ses options de personnalisation, permettant des flux de travail et des alertes sur mesure afin d'améliorer l'expérience client. Cependant, les utilisateurs expriment également le besoin de fonctionnalités de personnalisation plus intuitives pour répondre à des besoins opérationnels spécifiques et aux interactions avec les clients.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Mews POS et PixelPoint partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel POS Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Mews POS propose 335 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que PixelPoint en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews POS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Mews POS : Non. PixelPoint : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel POS Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Mews a un HT Score de 100 et PixelPoint a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits