The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 23 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
PXP se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Recurring Payments and Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments.
roommaster se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment Splitting.
Notes comparees basees sur 23 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $100/mo | From $300/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 23 |
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de traitement des paiements pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 6 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 7 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | — | #4 1 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | — | #4 0 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #4 7 avis |
| Luxe | — | #5 0 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine | — | #4 1 avis |
| Sejour prolonge | — | #4 0 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #4 14 avis |
| Europe | — | #5 0 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | — | #3 0 avis |
Both PXP by PXP and roommaster Payments aim to streamline hotel payment processes, but they approach this goal from different angles. PXP offers a comprehensive payment platform with multiple payment options and global reach, while roommaster Payments focuses on deep integration within your existing property management system (PMS) to reduce manual work and improve operational efficiency. How do these differences impact your hotel’s specific needs?
PXP’s lack of recent reviews and a 0/5 rating suggest it’s unproven in current hotel environments, whereas roommaster’s more recent feedback and higher customer support scores indicate a more reliable choice. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s operational priorities?
While PXP promises a broad set of features and multiple payment options, it lacks recent user feedback and a clear satisfaction record. roommaster Payments, with 20 reviews in the past six months and an NPS score of 8.4/10, demonstrates higher customer satisfaction and ongoing support. Given the importance of reliable support in payments processing, roommaster is the stronger choice at this moment.
In terms of overall ratings and recent review activity, roommaster Payments far exceeds PXP. Its ease of use, customer support, and positive hotel segment ratings make it the more dependable option for your hotel today.
PXP and roommaster Payments both promise to simplify payments, but they serve different hotel profiles. PXP provides a global, multi-channel payment ecosystem with extensive payment method support, ideal if your hotel operates across multiple countries or needs multi-currency settlement options like DCC and accepts diverse payment methods including Apple Pay, Paypal, and American Express.
roommaster Payments, on the other hand, is designed for hotels wanting seamless integration within their PMS, with features like deposit handling, pre-authorizations, and dispute resolution built into the system. If your hotel prioritizes operational efficiency, automated reconciliation, and reducing manual workload, roommaster is more suitable.
However, PXP’s lack of recent user reviews and an overall 0/5 rating make it difficult to recommend confidently. Do you need a proven, well-supported system, or are you prepared to navigate potential instability with a less-reviewed platform?
If your hotel needs a proven, support-rich system with a strong hotel user base and recent positive reviews, go with roommaster Payments. Its 20 recent reviews in the last six months and an 8.4/10 NPS demonstrate ongoing customer satisfaction and reliable support—crucial for payment systems.
If, however, your hotel requires a payment platform with diverse payment options supporting global currencies and multiple processors, PXP might seem appealing. But given the absence of recent reviews and a 0/5 rating, its long-term reliability is questionable. For most hotels, especially those prioritizing stability and support, roommaster Payments is the safer choice.
roommaster Payments scores a high 4.4/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews praising its straightforward integration and intuitive interface. Users highlight that support staff like Aladdein are helpful and resolve issues promptly, reflecting a strong support team.
In contrast, PXP’s interface and usability are unverified, and no recent reviews or ratings are available to confirm its user-friendliness. Given the critical importance of smooth payment workflows, roommaster’s more recent positive feedback makes it the clear winner here.
Edge: roommaster Payments
PXP offers 13 unique features, including multi-currency settlements, DCC, Google Pay, Apple Pay, Paypal, American Express acceptance, and multiple processor gateways. These features cater well to international hotels or properties needing flexible, multi-channel payment options.
roommaster Payments provides only one exclusive feature—payment splitting—but covers core hotel payment needs effectively, including deposits, pre-authorizations, and dispute management, with a focus on automation and integration. If you want a broader array of payment methods, PXP has the edge; if operational workflows matter more, roommaster’s features are sufficient.
Edge: PXP
roommaster Payments boasts a 4.45/5 support rating and recent reviews citing helpful, knowledgeable staff willing to resolve issues quickly. Comments like “they answer my calls and help resolve issues in a timely manner” reinforce the perception of reliable support.
There are no recent reviews or ratings for PXP, but its overall lack of feedback and a 0/5 rating cast doubt on its support quality. For critical payment operations, dependable support is essential, making roommaster Payments the superior choice.
Edge: roommaster Payments
roommaster Payments boasts 56 verified partners, including major property management and hospitality systems like Sage, Volo, and GuestCentric, along with shared integrations with Oracle Hospitality and Canary Technologies. This broad ecosystem supports extensive operational connectivity.
PXP has only 7 verified partners, with some notable integrations like Canary Technologies and Profitroom but far fewer overall. For hotels that rely on multiple integrated systems or plan to expand integrations, roommaster’s larger partner network offers more flexibility.
Edge: roommaster Payments
roommaster Payments has a recent, high NPS score of 8.4/10 based on 20 reviews, with hotel segments like resorts and independent hotels giving positive feedback on support and ease of use. Its recent review activity signals current relevance and satisfaction.
PXP, on the other hand, has a 0/5 overall rating and no recent reviews, making it impossible to determine user sentiment. Given the importance of user satisfaction for ongoing support, roommaster’s higher recent ratings hold considerable weight.
Edge: roommaster Payments
PXP’s pricing is not explicitly listed, but it appears to be a base fee of $100 with no mention of additional charges. roommaster Payments charges a base price of $300, with no mention of implementation fees or monthly per-room charges.
In absence of detailed PXP pricing, roommaster’s transparent flat fee provides clarity. If cost predictability is essential, roommaster’s straightforward pricing model is preferable.
Not ideal if your hotel needs a proven, support-driven platform, or if you prefer a system with recent reviews and high user satisfaction.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a broad array of payment methods or operates in multiple countries with complex international requirements.
The core difference lies in support and proven reliability. roommaster Payments is a well-supported, recent, and highly rated solution tailored for operational efficiency, whereas PXP’s limited recent feedback, unverified usability, and fewer integrations suggest it’s a less stable choice.
Choose roommaster Payments if your priority is support, ease of use, and recent positive hotel feedback. Its extensive integrations and proven track record make it a safer, more dependable option for most properties.
Opt for PXP only if your hotel needs its specific features like multi-currency settlements and diverse payment options, and you’re prepared to accept higher risk due to limited recent review data.
In summary, roommaster Payments currently stands out as the more reliable, well-supported payment platform, especially for hotels seeking operational stability and support. PXP may appeal to highly international or technologically advanced properties, but its unproven recent standing makes it a riskier option.
La tarification des Logiciel de traitement des paiements est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $300/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, PXP et roommaster Payments partagent 12 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Accepte Apple Pay | ||
| Accepte Google Pay | ||
| Accepte Paypal | ||
| Conversion de devise dynamique (DCC) | ||
| Fractionnement des paiements | ||
| Paiements récurrents | ||
| Règlements multidevises |
Affichage des principales differences. 2 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. PXP et roommaster Payments partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Payments Processing Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. PXP propose 7 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que roommaster Payments en propose 56. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. roommaster Payments est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.2/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
PXP : Non. roommaster Payments : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Payments Processing Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. PXP a un HT Score de 0 et roommaster a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits