The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Softstar se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 887 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Mews apprecient surtout ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, tandis que ceux de Softstar mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
Softstar |
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #3 329 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 397 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #3 45 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #3 49 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #5 220 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #2 170 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #1 130 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #8 106 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 660 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #10 17 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #28 8 avis | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Mews PMS stands out with its extensive reviews, recent updates, and broad industry adoption, while Softstar’s offerings remain less documented and review-deficient. Do you want a proven, highly-rated solution with a large user base or a less established platform? The clear answer is in the reviews and recent data.
Mews PMS functions as a cloud-based operating system tailored for modern hotels, offering over 750 reviews in the past six months alone, with a rating of 4.62/5. Softstar’s review count is nonexistent, and it provides no recent user feedback, making it difficult to gauge real-world performance. Mews’s recent reviews showcase a high level of satisfaction, with a Likelihood to Recommend of 93%, whereas Softstar lacks such data altogether.
Both platforms aim to streamline hotel operations, but Mews excels in automation, integrations, and user experience. Softstar’s focus, by contrast, appears more aligned with property management for rentals rather than full-service hotels. Is your goal operational automation and guest experience? If so, Mews’s robust review-backed performance clearly outpaces Softstar’s unverified claims.
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, highly-rated PMS with proven scalability—especially if you operate multiple properties or require extensive integrations—go with Mews. It offers 59 unique features exclusive to its platform, including a booking engine, guest CRM, revenue management, and automated housekeeping modules, supported by over 336 verified partners.
Conversely, Softstar might be suitable if your focus is on rental or property management automation, especially if your operation is small or in a niche where detailed tenant and maintenance tracking is key. But without recent reviews or a clear feature set, it’s hard to justify choosing Softstar over the extensively vetted Mews.
Mews scores 4.7/5 for ease of use, supported by a substantial review count (758, with 98 in the last six months). Users praise its modern, intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and minimal staff training, with many noting how quickly they adopted the system—“Mews is the most user-friendly hospitality cloud on the market,” says one reviewer.
Softstar’s user-friendliness is undocumented, with no recent reviews or ratings available. This absence suggests a lack of user feedback, which complicates assessing its ease of use.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, digital registration, integrated CRS, automated night audits, and a comprehensive booking engine. It also provides advanced modules like guest messaging, automated reminders, online check-in/out, and centralized user management.
Softstar’s feature list remains undisclosed and lacks comparable depth or detail. Given the extensive functionality and proven integrations, Mews clearly leads in feature richness.
Edge: Mews.
Mews is generally rated 4.27/5 for customer support, with recent reviews emphasizing their responsiveness and effective issue resolution. Users say, “Their support team sets new standards,” and appreciate the onboarding experience, especially during implementation. Some reviews note occasional bugs but rapid resolutions.
Softstar offers no recent reviews, support ratings, or customer feedback, making it impossible to evaluate service quality. The absence of user testimonials or ratings favors Mews’s established support reputation.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified partners, including prominent integrations like Criton, Right Revenue, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing. Its open API and expansive Mews Marketplace enable seamless connectivity across a broad spectrum of third-party solutions, enhancing operational flexibility.
In contrast, Softstar has no verified integrations listed, limiting its adaptability. For a hotel seeking a flexible, interconnected tech ecosystem, Mews’s integrations are unmatched.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s 4.62/5 rating is backed by 758 reviews, with recent feedback from diverse hotel segments—boutiques, hostels, city hotels—highlighting its ease of use, automation, and support. Hotels like Cresta Palace and The Neighborhood Hotel praise its connectivity and operational efficiencies, reinforcing its broad appeal.
Softstar’s review absence indicates no recent or substantial user ratings, making it impossible to compare satisfaction levels.
Edge: Mews.
Mews charges a base price of $900/month, with no free tier or trial options noted. Pricing is straightforward but may be considered an investment for smaller hotels.
Softstar provides no pricing information, leaving potential buyers uncertain about costs or whether it offers scalable or flexible pricing models.
In summary, Mews's transparent pricing and proven value make it a more predictable choice.
Not ideal if you need a rental-specific or tenant-focused property management system only.
Not ideal if you require a full-service hotel PMS with proven reviews, automation, and guest-facing features.
Mews stands out as a highly-rated, well-supported, and feature-rich PMS with recent positive reviews from a broad range of hotel segments. Its 99.5+ HT score, large review base, and recent user feedback confirm its reliability and scalability.
Choose Mews if your hotel needs a proven platform with extensive integrations, automation, and user satisfaction, especially if you operate multiple properties or want a modern digital experience.
Softstar may suit niche rental or property management needs, but its lack of recent reviews, features, and proven track record makes it a less confident choice for hotels prioritizing guest service, operational automation, and growth.
For hotels seeking a dependable, high-rated solution, Mews is the clear winner—an investment that supports your hotel’s current needs and future growth.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
Softstar | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Mews PMS et Softstar partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Mews PMS et Softstar partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Mews PMS propose 335 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Softstar en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Mews PMS : Non. Softstar : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Mews a un HT Score de 100 et Softstar a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits