The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Softstar se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 549 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 549 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de HOTELTIME apprecient surtout user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics, tandis que ceux de Softstar mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
Softstar |
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #5 219 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #3 238 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #2 46 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #8 7 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 239 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 241 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #4 143 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #4 49 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #52 4 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 384 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #5 111 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #1 21 avis | — |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your hotel needs a solution that streamlines operations, provides reliable support, and integrates with your existing tech stack. HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and Softstar both aim to serve these needs, but their approaches and market presence differ significantly. HotelTime offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform is backed by a large user base and recent positive reviews, whereas Softstar's focus is more niche, primarily serving rental property management with limited market data. Which platform truly fits your hotel's unique needs?
HotelTime PMS is a cloud-based, feature-heavy platform designed for properties of all sizes, including resorts and large groups. It boasts over 650 properties across 20+ countries, with a 4.83-star rating from 433 reviews, including recent feedback from 27 hotels in the last six months, indicating current relevance and user satisfaction.
Softstar, by contrast, is tailored more toward rental property and tenant management, with no publicly available user ratings or recent reviews, making it difficult to gauge its current performance or how well it adapts to hotel-specific demands. Its limited publicly available data suggests a niche focus, unlike HotelTime's broad hotel industry coverage.
While HotelTime’s extensive review base and recent positive feedback make it a trusted choice for hotels looking for a proven PMS, Softstar remains more obscure in the hospitality sector. When considering your hotel’s operational needs, the clearer leader is HotelTime, given its active user community and ongoing support.
If you need a scalable, all-in-one management system that covers reservations, housekeeping, revenue reports, and integrated POS, HotelTime is the clear choice. Its robust feature set includes 51 unique modules like guest CRM, online check-in, automated night audit, and multi-currency support, making it suitable for hotels that want a full operational toolkit.
Conversely, if your hotel primarily manages long-term rentals, tenant workflows, or requires AI-driven property performance insights, Softstar’s platform could be advantageous. Its strengths lie in automating tenant tracking, maintenance scheduling, and financial reporting, which are less relevant for traditional hotel operations.
For hotels seeking a well-established, hotel-specific system with proven scalability, HotelTime’s extensive features and verified integrations make it the better fit. Softstar’s narrower, rental-focused approach suits property managers prioritizing tenant management over guest experience.
HotelTime PMS’s user interface scores 4.66/5, with many reviews praising its intuitive design and straightforward onboarding process, supported by a 4.63/5 onboarding rating. The platform’s consistent positive feedback underscores its accessibility for staff, even during initial setup, with users appreciating clear navigation and comprehensive training resources.
Softstar, lacking publicly available ratings or recent user feedback, offers no measurable data on ease of use. Its niche focus on property management suggests a specialized interface, but without user reviews, it’s impossible to confirm whether it’s as user-friendly as HotelTime.
Edge: HotelTime PMS. Its high ratings and recent positive reviews affirm its user-friendly nature, making staff training and daily operations smoother.
HotelTime offers 51 unique features, including guest CRM, integrated CRS, online booking engine, automated night audit, multi-language and multi-currency support, and numerous modules for housekeeping, revenue management, and group functionality. This extensive feature set caters to a broad range of hotel needs.
Softstar, with no publicly listed features or recent updates, seems focused on tenant and property management features like maintenance scheduling and financial tracking. It lacks the hotel-centric modules present in HotelTime, such as booking engines or channel management.
Given its comprehensive feature list tailored for hotels, HotelTime holds a decisive edge for property operations that require extensive management capabilities.
Edge: HotelTime PMS. Its 51 specialized hotel features far surpass Softstar’s offerings, providing a complete management suite.
HotelTime’s support team scores 4.73/5, with reviews highlighting prompt, helpful assistance and detailed onboarding. Customers frequently mention the support staff’s responsiveness and ongoing help, which are critical during system implementation and troubleshooting.
Softstar, with no publicly available reviews or ratings, offers no data on support quality. Its smaller size and lack of visible user feedback mean it may lack the extensive support infrastructure that HotelTime offers.
Edge: HotelTime PMS. Its established support reputation and recent review volume make it more reliable for ongoing assistance.
HotelTime’s platform integrates with 58 verified partners, including Profitroom, Bookboost, and STR, enabling seamless connectivity with booking engines, channel managers, and analytics tools. These integrations facilitate a unified, efficient operation for your hotel.
Softstar reports zero verified integrations publicly, suggesting limited or no direct connections to third-party systems in its current offering. This lack of integrations could hinder your ability to connect with other essential tools.
Edge: HotelTime PMS. Its extensive verified integration network provides greater operational flexibility.
HotelTime’s 4.83/5 rating from 433 reviews, with recent feedback, indicates strong, current user satisfaction across various hotel segments, including resorts, city hotels, and boutique properties. Hoteliers frequently praise its ease of use, support, and feature-rich environment.
Softstar has no available ratings or reviews, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or compare it directly. The lack of recent feedback suggests limited market engagement or visibility.
Edge: HotelTime PMS. Its high, recent ratings reflect a well-supported, trusted solution among hotel operators.
HotelTime’s pricing starts at $600 per month, with no freemium or trial options publicly listed. This flat rate covers the comprehensive features needed by most hotels and resort properties.
Softstar’s pricing details are unavailable, which might imply a custom quote model or a less transparent approach. Without clear pricing, evaluating its value proposition is difficult.
Given the transparent and predictable pricing of HotelTime, it provides clearer cost expectations for your hotel’s budget planning.
Not ideal if your property is very small or operates on a limited budget, as the platform’s extensive features may be more than needed.
Not ideal if your hotel requires comprehensive guest management, channel integration, or front desk automation.
HotelTime PMS offers a broad, well-rounded management platform with proven scalability, hundreds of integrations, and strong user reviews, making it suitable for most hotels. Its recent reviews and high overall ratings solidify its position as a leading choice for property management.
Softstar, by contrast, appears to serve a niche property management market with no recent hotel-specific reviews or ratings publicly available. Its focus on tenant management and AI-driven property insights suggests it’s better suited for rental or multi-unit property portfolios than traditional hotels.
If your hotel needs a trusted, feature-rich PMS with a large community and recent positive feedback, HotelTime is the recommended choice. Softstar may serve well in property management contexts outside of typical hotel operations but lacks the hotel-specific validation needed for most hoteliers.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
Softstar | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, HotelTime PMS et Softstar partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 39 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. HotelTime PMS et Softstar partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. HotelTime PMS propose 58 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Softstar en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
HotelTime PMS : Non. Softstar : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. HOTELTIME a un HT Score de 92 et Softstar a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits