The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Tokeet se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 887 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Mews apprecient surtout ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, tandis que ceux de Tokeet mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #3 329 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 397 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #3 45 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #3 49 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #5 220 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #2 170 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #1 130 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #8 106 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 660 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #10 17 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #28 8 avis | — |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) tailored to your hotel’s needs can dramatically impact operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Mews PMS by Mews and Tokeet by Tokeet address different segments and business types, but their core functions differ significantly. Mews offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations and a proven track record in traditional hospitality, while Tokeet remains focused primarily on vacation rental management with limited global presence. Which one aligns best with your hotel’s goals?
Mews and Tokeet serve distinct markets, with Mews directly targeting traditional hotels, boutique properties, hostels, and resorts. Tokeet primarily caters to vacation rental operators and property managers managing multiple short-term rentals. While Mews’s platform is built to handle complex operations, integrations, and guest experiences at larger scales, Tokeet emphasizes ease of management for rental portfolios, often with less extensive automation or hospitality-specific features. Do you need a full-scale hotel PMS or a rental management tool?
Mews boasts a solid reputation backed by 758 recent reviews and a high overall rating of 4.62/5, reflecting strong customer satisfaction and ongoing innovation. In contrast, Tokeet has no recent reviews or rating data, making it difficult to gauge current user satisfaction or platform robustness. Are you willing to rely on a product with proven recent performance, or are you exploring a less tested solution?
If your hotel requires a scalable, feature-rich platform capable of managing reservations, front desk operations, revenue management, guest communication, and extensive integrations, Mews is the clear choice. Its advanced modules, including booking engine, guest CRM, housekeeping, and automation tools, make it suitable for independent hotels, boutique properties, and larger chains aiming for operational control and guest-centric features.
However, if your property operates as a vacation rental or manages multiple short-term rentals with a focus on channel management and automated invoicing, Tokeet might be more appropriate—though its limited reviews and market presence suggest less proven scalability for full-service hotels. For hoteliers seeking a comprehensive, modern PMS, Mews’s depth and recent positive feedback are decisive.
Mews scores 4.7/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive, modern interface, and quick onboarding. Users frequently note that staff can adapt rapidly thanks to its user-friendly design, and onboarding is described as smooth, with a support team that assists effectively.
Tokeet, however, has no recent review data available, leaving its user experience and onboarding process less transparent. Without recent feedback, it’s harder to assess how easily new users can adopt the platform or how well it integrates into daily hotel operations. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers an impressive suite of 59 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual support, multi-currency management, revenue and rate management modules, integrated CRM, online check-in, automated reminders, task management, guest messaging, digital registration, and a host of operational tools like housekeeper modules, real-time reporting, and integrated payment solutions.
Tokeet’s feature set appears more limited, focusing on core vacation rental functions such as booking management, channel management, invoicing, and guest communication, but it lacks the extensive modules found in Mews. For a hotel with complex needs and growth plans, Mews’s feature count and specialized modules give it a decisive edge.
Edge: Mews.
Mews maintains a customer support rating of 4.27/5, with reviews highlighting its support team's responsiveness, especially during implementation. Customers appreciate the proactive support, with some describing their onboarding as “smooth” and support agents as “helpful,” even when troubleshooting bugs or system issues.
Tokeet, lacking recent reviews and support ratings, provides no recent data to compare. The limited feedback suggests less transparency and confidence in support quality. For a hotel that values reliable, responsive assistance, Mews’s support reputation is clearly superior.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified partners, with integrations spanning channel managers, payment providers, CRS, revenue management, and more. Its extensive ecosystem includes shared partners like ChargeAutomation and HKeeper, plus over 1,000 marketplace integrations, allowing for a highly customizable tech stack.
Tokeet has just 3 verified integrations, including major vacation rental channels like Airbnb, Booking.com, and VRBO. While suitable for rental properties, this limited number restricts a hotel’s ability to connect to broader hotel management tools. For multi-channel, multi-system setups, Mews’s robust integration network offers a commanding advantage.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent reviews and high ratings—4.62/5 and a 93% likelihood to recommend—show strong user satisfaction across diverse property types, from boutique hotels to hostels and resorts. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, support, and innovative features, with many noting measurable operational improvements.
Tokeet, with no recent reviews or ratings, provides no recent user feedback, making it impossible to determine current hotel satisfaction or performance. Given the data, Mews clearly holds the higher rating among hotel clients.
Edge: Mews.
Mews's pricing starts at $900/month, with no free tier, trial, or implementation fees noted. Its pricing structure reflects a comprehensive platform suited to hotels seeking advanced features and extensive integrations.
Tokeet does not publicly disclose pricing details, which suggests it may have a more opaque or customized pricing approach—possibly more suited to small rental portfolios than larger hotels. For transparency and value for money, Mews’s predictable pricing is preferable.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Mews stands out as the more established, feature-rich, and well-rated platform, with recent reviews reinforcing its value and ongoing innovation. It’s best suited for hotels that demand operational depth, automation, and seamless integrations, especially as they scale.
Tokeet, while effective for vacation rentals and simple property management, lacks recent feedback and the extensive feature set necessary for full-service hotels. It’s best for small operators or rental portfolios that need basic automation and OTA connectivity.
If you want a proven, comprehensive PMS with recent positive reviews, go with Mews. For managing a rental-focused portfolio with minimal needs, Tokeet could suffice, but its limited hotel-specific capabilities make it less suitable for larger or traditional hotels.
In conclusion, Mews’s recent reviews, extensive features, and broad integrations make it the stronger choice for most hotels looking to modernize their operations and elevate guest experiences.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Mews PMS et Tokeet partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Mews PMS et Tokeet partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Mews PMS propose 335 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Tokeet en propose 3. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Mews PMS : Non. Tokeet : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Mews a un HT Score de 100 et Tokeet a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits