The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 42 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Akia shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile Friendly and Guest History.
Myra Self Check-in shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 42 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 42 | 0 |
After analyzing 42 verified reviews, Akia users most value its guest messaging, team communication and task management, contactless check-in, while Myra Self Check-in users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Guest messaging
▾
|
|
|
+
Team communication and task management
▾
|
|
|
+
Contactless check-in
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer feedback and reputation management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Automated responses
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration and data synchronization
▾
|
|
|
−
Guidebooks and digital tools
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Contactless Check-in vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #4 17 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #4 18 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #19 0 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #16 0 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #4 17 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #6 7 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #4 10 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #7 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 41 reviews | — |
Choosing the right contactless check-in platform can significantly impact your hotel’s operations and guest satisfaction. Both Akia Contactless Check-In and Myra Self Check-in aim to streamline guest arrivals, but their offerings diverge in features, support, and user feedback. Akia’s more established presence and active user reviews provide clearer insights into its performance, making it the stronger choice for hoteliers prioritizing proven solutions.
Both products solve the core problem of enabling contactless guest arrivals, reducing physical contact, and automating communication. Akia offers a comprehensive suite that includes digital registration, guest messaging, and automation, while Myra primarily focuses on self-service check-in and checkout. Akia’s extensive feature set and larger review base—38 reviews with recent activity—indicate a more mature, tested product.
In contrast, Myra’s reviews are nonexistent, and its review count is zero, limiting confidence in its ongoing support or real-world performance. If your hotel values a solution with a proven track record and ongoing customer feedback, Akia clearly leads. Would you prefer a platform with a demonstrated history of hotel integrations and customer satisfaction?
If your hotel needs an all-in-one, communication-focused contactless solution, go with Akia. Its features like automated replies, guest history, chatbots, and integrations with over 32 partners suit properties seeking robust guest engagement and operational automation.
If your primary goal is to implement a straightforward self check-in and checkout kiosk with minimal bells and whistles, Myra might seem appealing. However, without reviews or recent customer feedback, its reliability and feature depth remain uncertain. For hotels aiming for a proven, feature-rich platform, Akia is the safer choice.
Akia boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.82/5, based on extensive reviews praising its intuitive interface, fast onboarding, and helpful customer support. Users mention that staff adoption has been smooth and that Akia’s platform simplifies guest communication and internal team coordination.
Myra’s user experience ratings are unavailable, and with zero reviews, assessing its usability is impossible. Given Akia’s detailed feedback and high satisfaction scores, it clearly has the advantage in usability. Edge: Akia.
Akia offers 25 unique features, including photo sharing, Whatsapp and Facebook Messenger integrations, document scanning, payment processing, multilingual messaging, and automated guest surveys. These capabilities address a wide range of operational needs, setting it apart from basic check-in solutions.
Myra, with zero unique features documented, appears to lack the breadth of functionalities that Akia provides. Its focus seems limited to self check-in and checkout without additional communication or automation features. Edge: Akia.
Akia’s support ratings are 4.86/5, with reviews highlighting knowledgeable staff, quick issue resolution, and proactive onboarding. Reviewers indicate that Akia’s customer service enhances overall user experience, reducing frustrations and helping hotels get the most from the platform.
Given Myra’s review count of zero and no available support ratings or testimonials, we cannot assess its customer support quality. Akia’s proven track record and high satisfaction scores give it a clear support advantage. Edge: Akia.
Akia’s integration portfolio includes 32 verified partners, with key integrations for PMS systems like Oracle Hospitality, RoomRaccoon, WebRezPro, and Stayntouch. These integrations facilitate data synchronization and streamline operational workflows.
Myra lists only 4 verified partners, including Priority Software and Onity, which limits its compatibility and flexibility. If seamless integration with existing hotel systems matters, Akia’s extensive partner network is the clear winner. Edge: Akia.
Akia’s rating of 4.95/5 from 38 reviews reflects consistent high praise, especially among boutique hotels and independent properties. Recent reviews emphasize its ease of use, automation, and positive impact on guest reviews, including a case where a hotel improved its TripAdvisor ranking significantly.
Myra’s ratings are unavailable, and reviews do not exist, making it impossible to gauge hotel satisfaction. The abundance of recent, positive reviews for Akia indicates a higher confidence level among users. Edge: Akia.
Both Akia and Myra do not publicly disclose their pricing models. They do not operate on freemium, monthly flat, or per-room fees, and both state there is no implementation fee or trial info available. Exact costs likely depend on custom integrations and hotel size, so direct inquiry is necessary.
Akia is a comprehensive, well-rated guest communication platform with extensive features, integrations, and active hotel user feedback. Its broad functionality and proven support make it suitable for hotels seeking automation, reputation management, and operational efficiency.
Myra offers a basic self-service check-in/checkout solution, but with no reviews or recent customer feedback, its reliability and feature set remain uncertain. For hotels aiming for a trusted, feature-rich platform with ongoing support, Akia is the clear choice.
If your hotel values proven performance, high user satisfaction, and a broad feature set, Akia stands out. Conversely, if your needs are minimal, focusing solely on self check-in/out, and you are confident in unreviewed solutions, Myra might be worth exploring—but with caution.
Contactless Check-in pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Akia Contactless Check-In and Myra share 10 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Replies | ||
| Chatbot Booking Agent | ||
| Desktop App (non-web based) | ||
| Mobile Friendly | ||
| Photo Sharing | ||
| Whatsapp Integration |
Showing top differences. 13 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Automation emphasizes the guests experience at their fingertips. Akia closes the gap of missed opportunities by acting as a liaison to our guest satisfaction efforts. We have been..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
The messaging system is prized for facilitating real-time communication with guests, enhancing service quality. It helps staff manage guest requests a... The messaging system is prized for facilitating real-time communication with guests, enhancing service quality. It helps staff manage guest requests and issues promptly, which positively impacts guest satisfaction and operational efficiency.
Internal team communication and task management features are highlighted as significant benefits. These tools help hotel staff coordinate efficiently,... Internal team communication and task management features are highlighted as significant benefits. These tools help hotel staff coordinate efficiently, track tasks, and manage guest needs more effectively. Users believe improvements could be made in the clarity and usability of these systems.
Reviewers consistently appreciate Akia's contactless check-in feature, stating it makes the check-in process seamless and efficient. This feature redu... Reviewers consistently appreciate Akia's contactless check-in feature, stating it makes the check-in process seamless and efficient. This feature reduces physical interactions, streamlines the guest arrival experience, and ensures compliance with health guidelines, especially valued during the pandemic.
Where hoteliers push back
Many users highlight the benefit of Akia's automated responses which save time and effort. However, several reviews mention that these automated respo... Many users highlight the benefit of Akia's automated responses which save time and effort. However, several reviews mention that these automated responses can sometimes be inaccurate or mistimed, causing confusion for guests and requiring manual intervention from staff.
Users appreciate Akia's integration capabilities with PMS and other systems but desire improvements such as seamless credit card transaction integrati... Users appreciate Akia's integration capabilities with PMS and other systems but desire improvements such as seamless credit card transaction integration and better synchronization features to eliminate duplicated efforts and manual data entry.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Akia Contactless Check-In and Myra share many core Contactless Check-in features, but each has unique capabilities. Akia Contactless Check-In offers 32 verified integration partners, while Myra offers 4. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Akia Contactless Check-In leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Akia Contactless Check-In: No. Myra: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Contactless Check-in vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Akia has an HT Score of 63 and Myra Self Check-in has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor