The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 733 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Actabl shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.7/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile access on any device.
Infosys shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 733 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 733 | 0 |
After analyzing 733 verified reviews, Actabl users most value its task management and efficiency, guest request management, communication features, while Infosys users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Task Management and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Request Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Communication Features
▾
|
|
|
+
Service Integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Personalization and Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
Speed and Technical Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Access and Functionality
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Concierge Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #1 35 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #1 298 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #1 225 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #1 134 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 302 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #1 515 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #1 220 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #1 47 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #1 589 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 48 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #6 20 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #4 20 reviews | — |
Choosing between ALICE Guest Services by Actabl and Infosys hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and priorities. While ALICE offers a robust, feature-rich guest engagement platform supported by extensive reviews and recent data, Infosys’s Virtual Concierge remains relatively unreviewed and less established within the hospitality context. Your decision should reflect whether you prioritize a highly-rated, comprehensive concierge solution or a more niche, data-driven guest experience tool.
Both products aim to enhance guest experiences and streamline hotel operations, but they approach this goal differently. ALICE focuses on request management, task tracking, and personalized guest communication, making it a comprehensive solution with a proven track record. In contrast, Infosys’s platform centers on delivering personalized information to guests through their devices, with a strong emphasis on data utilization and integration. Do you need a full-service concierge platform or a specialized guest personalization tool?
ALICE, supported by over 569 reviews, demonstrates consistent satisfaction through features like real-time task management, customizable tickets, and vendor integrations. Infosys, with no available reviews, lacks the same level of validation and user feedback, raising questions about its performance and reliability in real-world hotel environments. Are you comfortable adopting a less reviewed solution, or does proven customer feedback sway your decision?
If your hotel requires a flexible, all-in-one concierge platform with strong operational tools and extensive integrations, go with ALICE. It’s ideal for hotels seeking to improve internal communication, request handling, and guest personalization, especially if you value a proven system supported by hundreds of reviews.
If your hotel’s focus is on delivering highly personalized guest information directly to rooms using existing devices, and your team is comfortable with a less proven platform, Infosys might appeal. However, given the lack of reviews and detailed user feedback, ALICE’s maturity and user satisfaction make it the more reliable choice for most hotels.
ALICE’s user interface scores a solid 4.57 out of 5, with most reviews emphasizing its intuitive design and straightforward onboarding process. Hotel staff find it easy to adopt, and its mobile app, while not perfect, generally supports efficient operations. Support interactions are rated 4.41 out of 5, with users praising prompt assistance.
Infosys offers no publicly available usability ratings or recent reviews, making it difficult to assess its ease of use or onboarding process. Given the extensive user feedback for ALICE and the absence of data for Infosys, edge: ALICE.
ALICE boasts 27 unique features, including request management, lost & found, real-time task tracking, in-app translation, preventative maintenance, and more. These tools support comprehensive guest and operational management, making it suitable for hotels seeking a versatile concierge.
Infosys offers no documented features beyond delivering personalized guest information via laptops and VOIP phones. Without detailed feature data, ALICE clearly has the edge, delivering a broader suite of operational tools.
ALICE’s customer support is rated 4.41 out of 5, with reviews highlighting quick responses and helpful assistance. Hoteliers report that ALICE’s support team generally resolves issues promptly, contributing to smooth implementation and ongoing use.
Infosys provides no recent reviews or ratings regarding support, leaving its service quality unverified. Based on available data, edge: ALICE.
ALICE connects with over 100 verified partners, including Opera, Birchstreet, STR, and Tripleseat, enabling seamless operational workflows and vendor management. This extensive integration network enhances its utility across various hotel systems.
Infosys has no verified integrations listed, potentially limiting its adaptability within existing hotel tech stacks. Edge: ALICE.
With 569 reviews and recent feedback from 76 users, ALICE’s overall rating stands at 4.54 out of 5, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across segments—luxury, boutique, resorts—rate ALICE highly, notably praising its customization, reliability, and support.
Infosys, lacking reviews, offers no quantitative or qualitative data to gauge hotel satisfaction. Based solely on user feedback, ALICE clearly holds a stronger reputation. Edge: ALICE.
ALICE’s pricing starts at $1,000 per month, with no free tier or trial, reflecting its enterprise-grade status. Infosys’s pricing is unavailable, and as a large consultancy, its costs likely vary significantly based on scope and customization. The lack of transparent pricing favors ALICE’s upfront, predictable model.
Not ideal if you’re a small hotel with minimal operational complexity or seeking a simple, lightweight solution.
Not ideal if you need proven functionality, extensive integrations, or a well-supported platform with user reviews.
ALICE offers a well-rounded, feature-rich platform with extensive user feedback, making it suitable for hotels seeking operational excellence and guest personalization. Its high ratings and recent reviews suggest it reliably supports day-to-day hotel management, from requests to maintenance.
Infosys’s Virtual Concierge centers on delivering personalized guest information, ideal for hotels prioritizing guest engagement over operational tools. However, the absence of reviews and detailed features raises concerns about its effectiveness and integration capabilities.
Choose ALICE if you want a tested, comprehensive solution with proven results, especially if your hotel values extensive support, integrations, and broad functionality. Opt for Infosys only if your focus is on highly tailored guest communication and you are comfortable with a less validated platform.
According to HTR's product database, ALICE Guest Services by Actabl and Infosys share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| In app translation | ||
| Lost & found module | ||
| Preventative maintenance module | ||
| Real time task tracking | ||
| Request Management | ||
| Virtual logbook |
Showing top differences. 15 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"We do recommend ALICE to other hotels since it is a way to facilitate work with perfection. ALICE makes our work easier and more efficient in regard to following up and keeping tr..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
ALICE aids in organizing and prioritizing tasks effectively, which users find key to running a productive concierge operation. This feature significan... ALICE aids in organizing and prioritizing tasks effectively, which users find key to running a productive concierge operation. This feature significantly streamlines departmental workflows and maintains accountability, thus enhancing overall service efficiency at the hotel.
Reviewers praised ALICE for its ability to efficiently manage guest requests, ensuring timely fulfillment and reducing miscommunication. It logs reque... Reviewers praised ALICE for its ability to efficiently manage guest requests, ensuring timely fulfillment and reducing miscommunication. It logs requests, assists in routing them to the appropriate departments, and tracks them until completion, boosting both guest satisfaction and operational efficiency.
ALICE enhances guest communication through multiple channels like SMS, email, and in-app messaging, offering seamless interaction with guests and betw... ALICE enhances guest communication through multiple channels like SMS, email, and in-app messaging, offering seamless interaction with guests and between departments. Users find the communication feature crucial for real-time updates, contributing to quicker resolution of guest requests and improved guest satisfaction.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate ALICE's personalization capabilities, allowing customization of guest services and interfaces, tailoring to specific needs. Yet, some... Users appreciate ALICE's personalization capabilities, allowing customization of guest services and interfaces, tailoring to specific needs. Yet, some reviews call for further flexibility in customizing reporting tools and more user-friendly dashboards for increased efficiency.
While many find ALICE reliable, some issues arise with speed during peak usage periods and occasional technical glitches. Suggested improvements inclu... While many find ALICE reliable, some issues arise with speed during peak usage periods and occasional technical glitches. Suggested improvements include optimizing speed and performance to ensure reliability, minimizing disruptions during high-traffic operations.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ALICE Guest Services by Actabl and Infosys share many core Concierge Software features, but each has unique capabilities. ALICE Guest Services by Actabl offers 100 verified integration partners, while Infosys offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ALICE Guest Services by Actabl leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ALICE Guest Services by Actabl: No. Infosys: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Concierge Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Actabl has an HT Score of 100 and Infosys has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor