The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 406 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Actabl shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile access on any device.
RunShiftRun shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 406 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 406 | 0 |
After analyzing 406 verified reviews, Actabl users most value its ease of use and navigation, communication and collaboration, task and ticket management, while RunShiftRun users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
RunShiftRun
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Navigation
▾
|
|
|
+
Communication and Collaboration
▾
|
|
|
+
Task and Ticket Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Real-time Alerts and Notifications
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Application
▾
|
|
|
−
User Interface Updates
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Staff Collaboration Tools vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
RunShiftRun
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #3 18 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 188 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #1 104 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #1 65 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
RunShiftRun
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 193 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #1 247 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #1 133 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #2 26 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
RunShiftRun
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #1 320 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #3 33 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #18 8 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #11 9 reviews | — |
Choosing between ALICE Service Delivery by Actabl and RunShiftRun for your hotel staff collaboration needs hinges on your priorities. ALICE is a mature, highly-rated platform with over 300 recent reviews, while RunShiftRun offers a simpler, less reviewed system designed to enhance communication. Both aim to streamline operations, but their capabilities and market presence differ significantly. For a hotel seeking a reliable, feature-rich solution with proven support, ALICE is the clear choice.
Both products serve to improve hotel staff collaboration, but they approach this goal differently. ALICE provides a broad set of functionalities—over 19 exclusive features—including task management, incident reporting, and multi-property oversight—designed for complex hotel operations. Conversely, RunShiftRun emphasizes guest-staff communication and operational simplification but lacks extensive features or integrations.
While ALICE boasts a 4.69/5 overall rating based on 328 reviews, RunShiftRun has no reviews, making the reliability of the latter less certain. ALICE’s recent reviews—64 in the last six months—offer current insights into its performance, whereas RunShiftRun’s absence of recent reviews renders it less transparent. Do you want a proven industry-standard or a less documented solution?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, highly customizable staff collaboration platform, go with ALICE. Its extensive feature set—like real-time task tracking, incident management, and multi-property monitoring—makes it suitable for larger or more complex operations. If your hotel is smaller, with simple communication needs and limited integrations, RunShiftRun could seem appealing, but the lack of reviews and features makes it less reliable for robust operations.
Your decision should also consider support and market presence—ALICE’s support ratings (4.52/5) and global reach in North America and Europe make it a safer, more proven choice. RunShiftRun’s niche focus and limited presence suggest it may lack the robustness needed for hotel staff coordination at scale. For most hotels, ALICE’s proven track record outweighs the minimal information on RunShiftRun.
Based on the ratings, ALICE’s user experience is highly rated at 4.67/5, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and mobile app compatibility. Its onboarding process scores a solid 4.49/5, indicating a smooth transition for staff. Conversely, RunShiftRun provides no user ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to assess ease of use confidently.
Given ALICE’s extensive positive feedback—many users call it "very intuitive" and "easy to use"—it’s clear that your team will likely adapt quickly. The lack of data on RunShiftRun’s usability tips the scale in favor of ALICE. Edge: ALICE.
ALICE outshines RunShiftRun with 19 exclusive features tailored for hotel operations, including loss & found modules, real-time task tracking, preventative maintenance, and an open API. These capabilities support complex workflows and multi-property management, which RunShiftRun currently lacks entirely.
RunShiftRun’s feature set appears limited or undocumented, with no confirmed unique features beyond basic communication functionality. ALICE’s broader, more versatile feature set makes it the better choice for hotels seeking detailed operational control. Edge: ALICE.
ALICE’s customer support boasts a 4.52/5 rating, with reviews emphasizing its responsiveness and ease of working with the support team. Clients describe ALICE’s support as “exceptionally easy to work with,” often praising its customization and ongoing assistance.
In contrast, RunShiftRun has no available reviews or ratings, leaving its support quality unverified. For hotels that value reliable, well-rated support, ALICE’s proven track record provides peace of mind. Edge: ALICE.
ALICE has verified integrations with over 100 partners, including well-known systems like Innspire, Birchstreet, and Tripleseat, facilitating seamless data exchange. RunShiftRun offers no verified integrations, limiting its flexibility and scalability.
If your hotel relies on a connected ecosystem of management systems, ALICE’s extensive integration options are a decisive advantage. Its open API and broad partner network ensure your existing tools will work smoothly. Edge: ALICE.
ALICE’s customer ratings are notably high at 4.69/5, with 92% of reviewers recommending it. Its reviews focus on ease of use, robust features, and support, especially from hotels in luxury and resort segments. RunShiftRun’s lack of reviews makes it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or segment preferences.
The recent, plentiful reviews for ALICE confirm it’s a trusted choice across different property types, whereas RunShiftRun’s unknown reputation makes it less reliable. Edge: ALICE.
ALICE’s pricing starts at $500 per month, with no free trial, freemium, or per-room charges. The cost reflects its extensive features and support, suitable for hotels seeking a comprehensive solution.
RunShiftRun’s pricing details are not publicly available, but its lack of reviews and features suggests it may be less costly or less comprehensive. However, the absence of transparent pricing makes it harder to evaluate value for money.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
ALICE is a comprehensive, well-established staff collaboration platform that excels in features, support, integrations, and user satisfaction. Its recent reviews and high ratings make it the safest choice for hotels seeking reliability and operational control. RunShiftRun may appeal to small properties with minimal needs, but the lack of reviews and features makes it a less trustworthy option for most hotels.
If your hotel needs a platform to coordinate complex operations, improve communication, and support growth, ALICE is the clear winner. It delivers proven results, extensive support, and a broad feature set that can scale with your property’s needs. Conversely, if your needs are minimal and you prefer a straightforward guest communication tool, RunShiftRun could be considered, but with caution given its limited market presence.
Staff Collaboration Tools pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
RunShiftRun
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, ALICE Service Delivery by Actabl and RunShiftRun share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
RunShiftRun
|
|---|---|---|
| In app translation | ||
| Inspection | ||
| Lost & found module | ||
| Preventative maintenance module | ||
| Real time task tracking | ||
| Virtual logbook |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"We do recommend ALICE to other hotels since it is a way to facilitate work with perfection. ALICE makes our work easier and more efficient in regard to following up and keeping tr..."
RunShiftRun
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Most users appreciate Actabl's user-friendly interface and ease of navigation, which reduces the learning curve and enhances staff productivity. Howev... Most users appreciate Actabl's user-friendly interface and ease of navigation, which reduces the learning curve and enhances staff productivity. However, there's a call for more intuitive design and consistent mobile app experience.
The platform is widely praised for centralizing communication and facilitating smooth coordination between departments, which is vital in delivering e... The platform is widely praised for centralizing communication and facilitating smooth coordination between departments, which is vital in delivering excellent guest services. Many emphasized the benefits of real-time task updates and shared information.
Users find task assignment and tracking robust, enhancing accountability and workflow efficiency. However, some users mention the lag in ticket comple... Users find task assignment and tracking robust, enhancing accountability and workflow efficiency. However, some users mention the lag in ticket completion and suggest improvements for quicker execution.
Where hoteliers push back
Actabl's real-time notifications improve situational awareness and responsiveness. However, missing or delayed alerts, especially in critical tasks, h... Actabl's real-time notifications improve situational awareness and responsiveness. However, missing or delayed alerts, especially in critical tasks, have led to recommendations for more reliable alert systems.
While mobile access is a core feature, users note disparities between mobile and desktop experiences, citing issues like logging in, task completion,... While mobile access is a core feature, users note disparities between mobile and desktop experiences, citing issues like logging in, task completion, and interface visibility. Enhancing mobile reliability is frequently requested.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ALICE Service Delivery by Actabl and RunShiftRun share many core Staff Collaboration Tools features, but each has unique capabilities. ALICE Service Delivery by Actabl offers 100 verified integration partners, while RunShiftRun offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ALICE Service Delivery by Actabl leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ALICE Service Delivery by Actabl: No. RunShiftRun: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Staff Collaboration Tools vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Actabl has an HT Score of 96 and RunShiftRun has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor