The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 95 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Amadeus shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.5/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile optimized/responsive and Pre-stay emails.
CENTROTEL shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 95 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 95 | 0 |
After analyzing 95 verified reviews, Amadeus users most value its ease of use, revenue enhancement, customer service, while CENTROTEL users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
CENTROTEL |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Revenue Enhancement
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Service
▾
|
|
|
+
Advanced Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Complexity and Usability Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Lag in Feature Implementation
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
CENTROTEL |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #22 11 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #15 36 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #7 26 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #9 6 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
CENTROTEL |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #17 32 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #12 41 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #10 34 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #14 11 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
CENTROTEL |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #7 39 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #19 14 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #16 10 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #7 8 reviews | — |
Choosing the right booking engine for your hotel is crucial for driving direct bookings, increasing revenue, and providing a seamless user experience. Both Amadeus’ iHotelier® Booking Engine and CENTROTEL aim to streamline this process, but their capabilities and market presence differ significantly. While CENTROTEL has no recent reviews or market data, Amadeus’s established reputation, extensive feature set, and solid user feedback make it the clear choice for hotels prioritizing proven performance.
Are you looking for a robust, feature-rich platform backed by extensive reviews? Or are you considering a lesser-known solution with limited data? The decision hinges on your hotel’s scale, needs, and confidence in the solution’s proven success.
Amadeus’s iHotelier® Booking Engine solves the core problem of converting website visitors into guests through a responsive, feature-packed platform that integrates with other Amadeus solutions. CENTROTEL, on the other hand, offers no tangible features or recent reviews, making it difficult to assess if it addresses your hotel’s booking challenges.
Amadeus’s platform boasts 36 unique features, including multi-currency, multi-lingual, and guest personalization options. CENTROTEL provides no documented features, leaving its capabilities and suitability uncertain. Given the lack of recent feedback for CENTROTEL, Amadeus’s proven performance and comprehensive feature set make it the more reliable choice.
Would you prefer a platform with a proven track record and extensive user feedback? Or are you comfortable exploring an untested provider with no recent data?
If your hotel needs a trusted, well-supported booking engine that enhances direct bookings, go with Amadeus. Its 93 reviews and 4.39/5 overall rating reflect consistent user satisfaction and recent positive feedback, particularly emphasizing revenue growth and integration capabilities.
If your hotel is seeking an unknown, unreviewed product with no documented features or support, CENTROTEL might be an option. However, the absence of reviews, features, and market presence suggests increased risk and uncertainty.
For hoteliers focused on performance, reliability, and ongoing support, Amadeus remains the superior choice. CENTROTEL’s lack of recent reviews and data make it unsuitable for hotels prioritizing proven solutions.
Amadeus’s platform scores 4.25/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Hoteliers report that, despite some initial complexity, daily use becomes friendly, supported by comprehensive help resources.
CENTROTEL offers no user feedback or ratings, making it impossible to assess its ease of use or how well staff can adopt it. The lack of data on usability suggests that potential users risk investing in a platform without understanding its learning curve or user experience.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s booking engine includes 36 features, such as mobile responsiveness, pre- and post-stay emails, automated reporting, multi-currency support, loyalty program integration, and conversion rate reports. These features are designed to boost revenue, guest engagement, and operational insights.
CENTROTEL provides no documented features, integrations, or functionalities. Without specific capabilities, it’s impossible to compare its offering to Amadeus’s robust suite.
Given the extensive feature set and documented capabilities, Amadeus clearly has the edge here.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s customer support scores 3.22/5, with reviews indicating mixed experiences. Some users praise their responsiveness and dedicated account management, while others cite slow responses and support delays. Recent reviews highlight the importance of ongoing training and responsive service in maximizing platform benefits.
CENTROTEL offers no recent reviews or support ratings, leaving hotel operators in the dark about its service quality. The lack of feedback significantly diminishes confidence in its support reliability.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified integration partners, including well-known names like Priority Software, Orange Hotel Marketing, and RevControl. These integrations facilitate seamless connectivity with property management systems, payment gateways, and marketing tools.
CENTROTEL reports zero verified integrations, suggesting limited or no connectivity options. Without integrations, your hotel’s ability to streamline operations and synchronize data could be severely hampered.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus has accumulated 93 recent reviews with an overall rating of 4.39/5. Users across various hotel segments, especially independent and boutique properties, rate it highly—often citing its revenue impact and feature richness. The latest reviews consistently reinforce its value in boosting direct bookings.
CENTROTEL, with no recent reviews or ratings, offers no data on user satisfaction. Its absence of feedback makes it impossible to determine how hoteliers perceive its performance or value.
Edge: Amadeus.
Both products do not publicly disclose pricing details. However, Amadeus does not charge implementation fees or offer a freemium model, implying a potentially significant investment aligned with its enterprise-grade features. CENTROTEL’s pricing remains undisclosed, which may be a concern for hotels seeking transparent costs.
Amadeus’s iHotelier® Booking Engine stands out as a proven, feature-packed solution trusted by hundreds of hotels worldwide. Its extensive reviews, high ratings, and broad integration network clearly demonstrate its reliability and value for properties seeking growth through direct bookings.
CENTROTEL, lacking recent reviews and documented features, presents a risky proposition. Without evidence of performance, support, or integrations, it is difficult to recommend for anything beyond basic or experimental use.
If your hotel needs a dependable platform with proven results, Amadeus offers a secure investment. For hotels willing to gamble on untested solutions without clear evidence, CENTROTEL might be worth exploring—but at your own risk.
According to HTR's product database, Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine and CENTROTEL share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
CENTROTEL |
|---|---|---|
| Automated reporting | ||
| Flat, floating and discounted rates | ||
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Post-stay emails | ||
| Pre-stay emails | ||
| Urgency messaging |
Showing top differences. 24 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
TravelClick receives high marks for ease of use from both hotel staff and end users. Its booking engine is described as intuitive, facilitating smooth... TravelClick receives high marks for ease of use from both hotel staff and end users. Its booking engine is described as intuitive, facilitating smooth handling of reservations and rate management. This user-friendliness is a key selling point.
Many hoteliers praise TravelClick for its ability to drive revenue through advanced pricing engines, promotional tools, and better integration with va... Many hoteliers praise TravelClick for its ability to drive revenue through advanced pricing engines, promotional tools, and better integration with various channels. Mentioned are features like multi-rate display, flash sales, and the new Web 4.0 platform, which have significantly boosted direct bookings and overall revenue.
Opinions on customer service are mixed. While some users laud the support for being attentive and helpful, there are numerous complaints about slow re... Opinions on customer service are mixed. While some users laud the support for being attentive and helpful, there are numerous complaints about slow response times and difficulty in resolving issues. This inconsistency is an important consideration for potential buyers.
Where hoteliers push back
TravelClick's robust integration with various systems, including PMS and payment gateways, is highly appreciated. Many reviews highlight seamless conn... TravelClick's robust integration with various systems, including PMS and payment gateways, is highly appreciated. Many reviews highlight seamless connectivity that supports diverse functionalities and simplifies management through unified interfaces.
Despite its strengths, several users report challenges in usability, citing complex interfaces and a steep learning curve for certain features. This c... Despite its strengths, several users report challenges in usability, citing complex interfaces and a steep learning curve for certain features. This complexity can hinder optimal use of the system, especially for less experienced users.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine and CENTROTEL share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine offers 104 verified integration partners, while CENTROTEL offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine leads in ease of use at 4.3/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine: No. CENTROTEL: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Amadeus has an HT Score of 72 and CENTROTEL has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor