The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 53 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Amadeus shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Reporting Dashboard and Guest profiles.
Megasys shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 53 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 53 | 0 |
After analyzing 53 verified reviews, Amadeus users most value its integration and usability, innovation and updates, analytics and reporting, while Megasys users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Integration and Usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Innovation and Updates
▾
|
|
|
+
Analytics and Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Revenue and Pricing Strategy
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customer Support
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Reservations Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #8 7 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #5 24 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #3 10 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #4 3 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #6 18 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #6 17 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #4 16 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #6 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #5 13 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #5 12 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #4 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #3 4 reviews | — |
Choosing between Amadeus iHotelier® CRS and Megalynx by Megasys hinges on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and need for integrated features. While both systems aim to streamline reservations and distribution, Amadeus offers a broad suite of functionalities backed by extensive industry presence. Megalynx, meanwhile, emphasizes straightforward distribution with a focus on minimizing errors and maximizing occupancy. Your decision ultimately depends on whether your hotel values a comprehensive platform or targeted distribution optimization.
Amadeus’s strong reputation is underpinned by over 52 recent reviews, a high overall rating of 4.57/5, and an active user base across multiple regions. Megasys, with no recent reviews or ratings, lacks the same level of proven user satisfaction. Do you prioritize a mature platform with proven customer feedback, or are you exploring newer, less-tested options?
Amadeus is designed for hotels seeking an all-encompassing CRS that manages reservations, channels, revenue, and guest profiles. Its extensive feature set—covering booking engines, channel management, reporting dashboards, and integrations—caters to mid-sized to large hotels or chains that want a centralized system. Megalynx, in contrast, is a straightforward reservation distribution tool focusing on ARI synchronization, OTA rate parity, and occupancy maximization. It’s best suited for smaller hotels or properties looking to optimize specific channels without the need for broader management features.
If your hotel needs a fully integrated CRS that simplifies multi-channel distribution and enhances revenue management, go with Amadeus. If your primary goal is accurate, real-time reservation distribution with minimal errors, then Megalynx could be sufficient. Are you looking for a full platform or a specialized distribution tool?
Amadeus scores a 4.43/5 for ease of use, supported by positive reviews praising its user-friendly interface once fully understood and comprehensive onboarding. Some users mention a steep initial learning curve but acknowledge that daily use becomes more intuitive. Megalynx has no available user ratings or reviews to assess its ease of use, suggesting a lack of widespread feedback or adoption.
Given the detailed reviews and high overall rating, Amadeus’s interface and onboarding experience are more established and validated. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus offers 18 unique features, including a booking engine, channel management, reporting dashboards, metasearch connectivity, RMS and PMS integrations, geotargeted pricing, and dynamic pricing, among others. These capabilities cover the full spectrum of reservation and revenue management needs. Megalynx provides no additional features outside its core ARI distribution and synchronization functions, limiting its scope.
For a hotel seeking a comprehensive CRS with multiple integrated functionalities, Amadeus’s extensive feature set provides clear advantages. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s customer support has a 4.15/5 rating supported by reviews describing helpful, friendly, and responsive service. Users appreciate the assistance, though some mention the need for more tailored training and quicker responsiveness in certain cases. Megalynx, with no reviews or ratings, offers no transparent support reputation.
Based on available data, Amadeus's support system is more established and better documented. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified partner integrations, including prominent names like Priority Software, Orange Hotel Marketing, RevControl, and Uniguest. These connections enhance operational efficiency across various hotel management systems. Megasys does not list any verified integrations, limiting its compatibility scope.
If your hotel relies on multiple third-party tools, Amadeus’s extensive integration network makes it the clear choice. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus has a 4.57/5 overall rating from 52 reviews, with recent feedback reinforcing its reliability. Hotels of various sizes and segments—especially independent and boutique hotels—rate it highly, with some reviews praising its ease of management and customer service.
Megalynx has no ratings or recent reviews to compare. Without user feedback, Amadeus’s reputation remains significantly stronger. Edge: Amadeus.
Pricing details for both products are not publicly disclosed. Amadeus does not offer a freemium or trial, implying a potentially higher investment. Megalynx's pricing is also unavailable, but its limited feature scope suggests a lower or more straightforward cost structure.
Since specific costs are not provided, your hotel should request custom quotes based on scale and needs to determine value.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, standalone reservation system without broader management features. Hotels that prioritize minimal training or have very limited budgets may find Amadeus overly complex or costly.
Not ideal if your hotel needs a full suite of revenue management, guest engagement, or integrated PMS features. Larger hotels or chains with complex operational needs should look elsewhere.
Amadeus offers a broad, feature-rich CRS that caters to hotels seeking a full management platform with extensive integrations and proven user satisfaction. Its strengths lie in comprehensive tools for reservations, revenue management, and distribution, making it the preferred choice for mid-sized to large hotels or chains.
Megalynx focuses on distribution accuracy, OTA rate parity, and minimizing overbookings. It’s best suited for smaller hotels or properties with straightforward distribution needs that want a simple, reliable solution.
If your hotel needs an all-in-one system that covers every aspect of reservation and revenue management, Amadeus is the clear choice. For targeted distribution optimization without the complexity, Megalynx can be appropriate, though it lacks the proven user feedback of the former. Ultimately, the decision should align with your hotel’s operational scope and strategic priorities.
According to HTR's product database, Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) and Megalynx (by Megasys) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking engine | ||
| Call center functionality | ||
| Channel management & OTA distribution | ||
| Content management | ||
| Metasearch connectivity | ||
| Reporting Dashboard |
Showing top differences. 6 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
TravelClick is praised for seamless integration with various channels, GDS, and PMS systems such as Opera. However, concerns are noted regarding the c... TravelClick is praised for seamless integration with various channels, GDS, and PMS systems such as Opera. However, concerns are noted regarding the complicated OTA Sync implementation and the need for the platform to become more user-friendly. Several reviews highlight the long integration times and a few usability challenges that need improvement.
There are mixed reviews regarding the innovation and continuous updates to the platform. Some users appreciate the frequent enhancements and new featu... There are mixed reviews regarding the innovation and continuous updates to the platform. Some users appreciate the frequent enhancements and new features, while others feel that certain aspects, like iHotelier CRS, need more significant updates to remain contemporary and intuitive.
The analytics and reporting tools within TravelClick are highly valued by hoteliers for their ability to track performance and make informed decisions... The analytics and reporting tools within TravelClick are highly valued by hoteliers for their ability to track performance and make informed decisions. Users highlight the detailed business intelligence reports and market intelligence capabilities as critical components for strategy development.
Where hoteliers push back
The customer support of TravelClick is generally appreciated for being helpful, professional, and efficient. Several reviews note the responsiveness a... The customer support of TravelClick is generally appreciated for being helpful, professional, and efficient. Several reviews note the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, though there are mentions of delayed replies and insufficient training. The need for local support in various regions and more training options is also highlighted.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) and Megalynx (by Megasys) share many core Hotel Reservations Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) offers 104 verified integration partners, while Megalynx (by Megasys) offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) leads in ease of use at 4.4/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS): No. Megalynx (by Megasys): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Reservations Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Amadeus has an HT Score of 79 and Megasys has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor