The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 53 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Amadeus shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like RMS connectivity.
Septeo Hospitality shines , with exclusive features like Availability Management and Refund Vouchers.
Side-by-side ratings based on 53 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 53 | 0 |
After analyzing 53 verified reviews, Amadeus users most value its integration and usability, innovation and updates, analytics and reporting, while Septeo Hospitality users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Integration and Usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Innovation and Updates
▾
|
|
|
+
Analytics and Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Revenue and Pricing Strategy
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customer Support
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Reservations Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #8 7 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #5 24 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #3 10 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #4 3 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #6 18 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #6 17 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #4 16 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #6 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #5 13 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #5 12 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #4 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #3 4 reviews | — |
Choosing between Amadeus iHotelier® CRS and Septeo Hospitality’s Resalys neo boils down to your hotel’s specific needs, scale, and strategic priorities. Amadeus offers a comprehensive, well-reviewed CRS with a broad global presence, while Resalys provides an all-in-one solution combining CRS, PMS, and channel management, though it has fewer reviews and a narrower regional footprint. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize proven market presence and extensive integrations or a unified platform with automation features.
Amadeus’s iHotelier stands out due to its long-established reputation and extensive review base, particularly within North America and Europe. Resalys neo, while offering impressive automation capabilities, has yet to establish a similar market presence or garner substantial recent user feedback. How do these differences align with your hotel’s operational goals?
Amadeus iHotelier is designed to support hotels of all sizes seeking a scalable CRS with extensive distribution options, especially those with complex channel needs. Resalys neo caters well to larger tourism operators like resorts, holiday rentals, and hotel groups needing an integrated platform that handles reservations, PMS, and channel management in one place.
If your hotel prioritizes a proven, globally adopted CRS with a large user base, extensive integrations, and strong analytics, Amadeus is the logical choice. Conversely, if your hotel or tourism business values an all-in-one automation-driven platform that consolidates multiple functions and partners, Resalys neo could better meet your needs. Are you looking for a flexible, mature system or a unified, automation-heavy platform?
Amadeus iHotelier boasts a high user rating of 4.43/5 for ease of use, with reviewers praising its intuitive interface after initial training, despite a steep learning curve at the start. Support staff are noted for helpfulness, but some mention the platform can be complex for new users. Onboarding is generally smooth, with a rating of 4.1/5.
Resalys neo, on the other hand, has no publicly available user ratings, making it difficult to compare usability directly. Given the complexity of combining CRS, PMS, and channel management, it may require a more intensive onboarding process. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus offers a broad set of features, with 17 shared core capabilities and one unique feature: RMS connectivity, supporting revenue management. Resalys neo provides two exclusive features: Availability Management and Refund Vouchers, alongside its integrated CRS-PMS-channel manager suite.
While Amadeus’s feature set is more extensive, Resalys neo’s strengths lie in automation, ancillary sales, and partner connectivity—connecting with over 90 partners. If your hotel needs a feature-rich CRS with advanced revenue tools, Amadeus is preferable. For integrated automation and partner management, Resalys could be more suitable. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus is rated 4.15/5 on customer support, with reviews highlighting helpful, professional support staff and responsive service, though some mention delays. Its widespread global support network ensures regional assistance in many markets.
Resalys neo lacks recent reviews or ratings, making comparison impossible. Given the importance of support in complex systems, Amadeus’s established support reputation makes it the safer choice. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus has verified 104 integration partners, including major GDS, PMS, and channel management providers, with 4 shared partners with Resalys neo. Notable integrations include Opéra, SiteMinder, and Profitroom, allowing extensive distribution and data flow.
Resalys neo connects with 13 verified partners, including notable OTAs and industry solutions, but with a narrower ecosystem. If broad connectivity is critical, Amadeus’s extensive integration network offers a clear advantage. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s hotelier reviews are recent and plentiful, with an overall rating of 4.57/5 based on 52 reviews, mostly from North America, Europe, and Asia. Independent hotels and brand chains rate it highly, praising its comprehensive features and usability.
Resalys neo has no recent reviews or publicly available ratings, limiting reliability. Given the volume and recency of Amadeus feedback, it is the stronger-rated option by hoteliers. Edge: Amadeus.
Pricing for Amadeus iHotelier is not publicly disclosed, but it generally involves a combination of setup fees and ongoing charges, typical for enterprise CRS solutions. Resalys neo’s pricing details are also unavailable, but it’s likely a custom quote based on size and scope.
Both products do not offer freemium or transparent monthly plans, emphasizing enterprise-level engagement. Your hotel will need to request quotes directly to compare costs, but Amadeus’s extensive track record suggests a premium pricing model.
Not ideal if your hotel is small and prefers a simple, low-cost system or regional support only.
Not ideal if your hotel needs a highly established, widely supported CRS or operates in regions outside Europe, where support and reviews are limited.
Amadeus iHotelier is a seasoned, well-reviewed CRS with a proven global footprint, making it a reliable choice for hotels needing a mature, feature-rich platform. Its broad integrations and extensive customer base provide confidence in its capabilities.
Resalys neo offers a compelling, automation-focused platform designed for large tourism operators. Its all-in-one approach suits businesses that want to consolidate multiple functions into one cloud-based system, but with less proven market penetration and fewer recent reviews.
If your hotel values a proven, large-scale CRS with strong support and extensive integrations, go with Amadeus. If your business prioritizes automation, an integrated platform, and partner connectivity, Resalys neo could meet your needs, provided regional support aligns.
In summary, for most hotels considering current data, Amadeus’s extensive reviews, higher ratings, and global presence make it the safer, more reliable choice. Resalys neo remains a promising but less tested option suited to specific tourism segments or larger operators willing to invest in automation and integration.
Hotel Reservations Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) and Resalys neo (by Septeo Hospitality) share 17 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Availability Management | ||
| RMS connectivity | ||
| Refund Vouchers |
What hoteliers love
TravelClick is praised for seamless integration with various channels, GDS, and PMS systems such as Opera. However, concerns are noted regarding the c... TravelClick is praised for seamless integration with various channels, GDS, and PMS systems such as Opera. However, concerns are noted regarding the complicated OTA Sync implementation and the need for the platform to become more user-friendly. Several reviews highlight the long integration times and a few usability challenges that need improvement.
There are mixed reviews regarding the innovation and continuous updates to the platform. Some users appreciate the frequent enhancements and new featu... There are mixed reviews regarding the innovation and continuous updates to the platform. Some users appreciate the frequent enhancements and new features, while others feel that certain aspects, like iHotelier CRS, need more significant updates to remain contemporary and intuitive.
The analytics and reporting tools within TravelClick are highly valued by hoteliers for their ability to track performance and make informed decisions... The analytics and reporting tools within TravelClick are highly valued by hoteliers for their ability to track performance and make informed decisions. Users highlight the detailed business intelligence reports and market intelligence capabilities as critical components for strategy development.
Where hoteliers push back
The customer support of TravelClick is generally appreciated for being helpful, professional, and efficient. Several reviews note the responsiveness a... The customer support of TravelClick is generally appreciated for being helpful, professional, and efficient. Several reviews note the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, though there are mentions of delayed replies and insufficient training. The need for local support in various regions and more training options is also highlighted.
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) and Resalys neo (by Septeo Hospitality) share many core Hotel Reservations Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) offers 104 verified integration partners, while Resalys neo (by Septeo Hospitality) offers 13. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) leads in ease of use at 4.4/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS): No. Resalys neo (by Septeo Hospitality): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Reservations Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Amadeus has an HT Score of 79 and Septeo Hospitality has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor