The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 53 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Amadeus shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Reporting Dashboard and Guest profiles.
travclan shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 53 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 53 | 0 |
After analyzing 53 verified reviews, Amadeus users most value its integration and usability, innovation and updates, analytics and reporting, while travclan users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
travclan |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Integration and Usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Innovation and Updates
▾
|
|
|
+
Analytics and Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Revenue and Pricing Strategy
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customer Support
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Reservations Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
travclan |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #8 7 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #5 24 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #3 10 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #4 3 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
travclan |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #6 18 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #6 17 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #4 16 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #6 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
travclan |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #5 13 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #5 12 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #4 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #3 4 reviews | — |
Choosing the right reservations system can significantly influence your hotel's revenue, operational efficiency, and guest satisfaction. Amadeus’s iHotelier® CRS has established a strong reputation, boasting over 52 recent reviews with an overall rating of 4.57 out of 5, whereas travclan has no reviews and no rated performance. This makes Amadeus the more trusted and proven choice backed by comprehensive user feedback.
Both products aim to streamline reservations, distribution, and revenue management, but they diverge sharply in market presence, feature depth, and support. Does your hotel need a well-established, feature-rich system with extensive integrations, or are you exploring a less proven platform? Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and desire for reliability.
If your hotel requires a trusted, scalable CRS with a proven track record, opt for Amadeus. Its extensive feature set—including booking engine, channel management, content control, and metasearch connectivity—makes it suitable for mid-scale to large hotels looking to automate distribution and maximize revenue.
Conversely, if your hotel is small or experimental, with limited budget and a desire to test new solutions, travclan might seem appealing. However, given the lack of reviews and features, it’s less suitable for properties seeking reliable, well-supported reservations software.
In summary, prioritize Amadeus if you want a dependable, fully-featured system; consider travclan only if your hotel is very small or willing to accept higher uncertainty.
Amadeus’s iHotelier scores 4.43 out of 5 for ease of use, reflecting a user interface that’s generally friendly but has a learning curve, especially initially. According to reviews, onboarding is rated at 4.1 out of 5, with some users mentioning that the system can be complex at first but becomes manageable with experience.
Travclan, lacking review data, offers no insights into usability. Given the absence of feedback, it’s impossible to compare user-friendliness directly.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s CRS offers 18 unique features, including a booking engine, channel management, reporting dashboards, metasearch connectivity, content management, RMS integration, geotargeted pricing, and multi-property management, among others. These features support complex distribution needs and revenue management.
Travclan provides no listed features, making it impossible to compare feature depth or scope directly. Without documented functionalities, Amadeus clearly leads in feature richness.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s support scores 4.15 out of 5, with reviews highlighting friendly, helpful support and good onboarding. Some users note that support responsiveness can vary, but overall, users appreciate the assistance they receive.
Travclan has no review data or support ratings available, making this comparison impossible. Given Amadeus’s established reputation, it’s safer to trust its support infrastructure.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified integration partners, including major GDS, PMS, and OTAs like Yanolja, Profitroom, and RevControl. This extensive network ensures your hotel can connect seamlessly with most distribution channels.
Travclan only has 1 verified integration partner, sharing Yanolja Cloud Solution, with no additional data. This limited connectivity sharply restricts its integration capabilities.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s overall rating of 4.57 and a strong NPS score of 8.38/10 reflect high user satisfaction, especially among independent (4.85/5) and branded hotels (5/5). Recent reviews reinforce its reliability and feature robustness.
Travclan has no reviews or ratings, so it cannot be rated or compared directly. For hoteliers seeking proven satisfaction, Amadeus is the clear leader.
Edge: Amadeus.
Pricing for Amadeus is not publicly disclosed; it typically involves custom quotes based on hotel size and needs. As such, total costs can vary significantly.
Travclan’s pricing details are also unavailable, suggesting it may be a more flexible or smaller-scale solution. However, without transparency, assessing value is challenging.
In general, expect Amadeus to be more costly but more comprehensive, and travclan to be less transparent or potentially less expensive.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, has minimal distribution needs, or prefers a simple, low-cost solution.
Not ideal if your hotel needs proven scalability, extensive integrations, or detailed analytics.
Amadeus’s iHotelier CRS is a proven, feature-rich, widely integrated platform that suits mid-sized to large hotels seeking reliable distribution and revenue management. Its extensive review base and recent feedback underscore its strength and stability, making it the safer, more dependable choice.
Travclan offers a less tested alternative, with no reviews or documented features, making it unsuitable for hotels that require proven performance, support, and integration. It might appeal to very small properties or those willing to accept higher risk and lower support.
In conclusion, if you prioritize reliability, features, and proven satisfaction, Amadeus is the clear winner. For hotels with minimal needs and a focus on cost or experimentation, travclan remains an unverified option—though it lacks the backing of user reviews and integration depth.
According to HTR's product database, Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) and travclan share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
travclan |
|---|---|---|
| Booking engine | ||
| Call center functionality | ||
| Channel management & OTA distribution | ||
| Content management | ||
| Metasearch connectivity | ||
| Reporting Dashboard |
Showing top differences. 6 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
TravelClick is praised for seamless integration with various channels, GDS, and PMS systems such as Opera. However, concerns are noted regarding the c... TravelClick is praised for seamless integration with various channels, GDS, and PMS systems such as Opera. However, concerns are noted regarding the complicated OTA Sync implementation and the need for the platform to become more user-friendly. Several reviews highlight the long integration times and a few usability challenges that need improvement.
There are mixed reviews regarding the innovation and continuous updates to the platform. Some users appreciate the frequent enhancements and new featu... There are mixed reviews regarding the innovation and continuous updates to the platform. Some users appreciate the frequent enhancements and new features, while others feel that certain aspects, like iHotelier CRS, need more significant updates to remain contemporary and intuitive.
The analytics and reporting tools within TravelClick are highly valued by hoteliers for their ability to track performance and make informed decisions... The analytics and reporting tools within TravelClick are highly valued by hoteliers for their ability to track performance and make informed decisions. Users highlight the detailed business intelligence reports and market intelligence capabilities as critical components for strategy development.
Where hoteliers push back
The customer support of TravelClick is generally appreciated for being helpful, professional, and efficient. Several reviews note the responsiveness a... The customer support of TravelClick is generally appreciated for being helpful, professional, and efficient. Several reviews note the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, though there are mentions of delayed replies and insufficient training. The need for local support in various regions and more training options is also highlighted.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) and travclan share many core Hotel Reservations Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) offers 104 verified integration partners, while travclan offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) leads in ease of use at 4.4/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS): No. travclan: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Reservations Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Amadeus has an HT Score of 79 and travclan has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor