Amadeus Property Management vs. Shiji Daylight PMS: Which Is Right for You?

Updated May 16, 2026  ·  38 verified reviews analyzed

TLDR

We analyzed 38 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:

Amadeus shines , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and On premise.

Shiji Group shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.

See the full breakdown below ↓

How Does Amadeus Property Management Compare to Shiji Daylight PMS?

Side-by-side ratings based on 38 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.

HTScore
0
75
Likelihood to Recommend
78%
90%
Ease of Use
3.5/5
4.6/5
Customer Support
3.6/5
4.6/5
Value for Money
3.0/5
4.5/5
Starting Price Contact sales From $1,200/mo
Verified Reviews 4 34

What Are the Pros and Cons of Amadeus Property Management vs Shiji Daylight PMS?

After analyzing 38 verified reviews, Amadeus users most value its , while Shiji Group users highlight ease of use, support team, implementation. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.

Amadeus Amadeus Shiji Group Shiji Group
Pros
+ Ease of Use
+ Support Team
+ Implementation
+ Training Materials
Cons
Reporting and Analytics
System Speed
Integration Capabilities

Amadeus vs Shiji Group: Rankings by Hotel Segment

How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.

By Hotel Size

Segment Amadeus Amadeus Shiji Group Shiji Group
Small (10-24 rooms) #56 1 reviews #53 2 reviews
Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) #47 1 reviews #31 17 reviews
Large (75-199 rooms) #26 2 reviews #11 13 reviews
X-Large (200+ rooms) #26 0 reviews #22 2 reviews

By Property Type

Segment Amadeus Amadeus Shiji Group Shiji Group
Boutique #50 1 reviews #33 17 reviews
Luxury #42 2 reviews #24 25 reviews
Branded / Chain #34 3 reviews #22 19 reviews
Extended Stay #51 0 reviews #45 2 reviews

By Region

Segment Amadeus Amadeus Shiji Group Shiji Group
North America #37 1 reviews #33 4 reviews
Europe #38 2 reviews #30 8 reviews
Asia Pacific #41 0 reviews #14 5 reviews
Middle East #5 14 reviews

The Decision

Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue growth. Both Amadeus Property Management by Amadeus and Shiji Daylight PMS aim to streamline your hotel operations, but they differ significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and specific needs, so understanding these differences is key.

Amadeus offers a more traditional, well-established solution with a focus on distribution and revenue management, whereas Shiji provides a modern, cloud-native platform with extensive automation and integration capabilities. Which one aligns better with your current and future goals?

Is Amadeus Property Management or Shiji Daylight PMS Better for Hotels?

Amadeus Property Management has been around since 1987, targeting midchain and independent hotels with its comprehensive distribution and revenue tools. Its core strength lies in distribution integrations, channel management, and guest CRM, making it suitable for hotels looking to maximize occupancy and demand through robust distribution channels.

In contrast, Shiji Group, founded in 1998, emphasizes a scalable, cloud-native approach designed for hotels of all sizes. It offers a broad array of features—84 exclusive ones—such as mobile check-in, guest messaging, and automation tools, making it particularly appealing for hotels wanting a flexible, modern system.

One major contrast is the user feedback: Shiji has more recent and numerous reviews (32 reviews in the last six months versus only 4 for Amadeus), indicating a more active user base and ongoing support. Shiji’s higher review scores (74.69/100 overall) and recent positive feedback suggest it’s gaining popularity, especially among hotels seeking advanced automation. Do these differences matter more to your hotel’s operational style and growth plans?

Shiji Daylight PMS vs Amadeus Property Management: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

Your choice depends on your hotel type and priorities. If your hotel needs a well-established, distribution-driven PMS with advanced revenue management, Amadeus is a suitable candidate. Its strengths include a channel manager, guest CRM, and a proven track record for mid-sized hotels aiming for demand generation.

However, if your hotel values a modern, flexible platform that simplifies daily operations and enhances guest engagement, Shiji Group is the clear winner. Its features like online check-in, guest messaging, automation, and a user-friendly interface are ideal for hotels wanting quick deployment and scalable improvements.

For hotels seeking to innovate and automate, Shiji’s broad feature set and recent positive reviews make it the smarter choice, especially considering its higher customer satisfaction and active support system.

Is Amadeus or Shiji Easier to Use?

Ease of use is critical for staff adoption and operational efficiency. Amadeus scores 3.5/5 for ease of use, with some users describing its interface as user-friendly but citing issues with system speed and limited customization. On the other hand, Shiji excels with a 4.63/5 score, with users praising its intuitive design, quick training, and seamless daily task management.

Shiji’s modern, cloud-native architecture makes onboarding smoother, with many reviewers noting that new team members pick it up quickly. Support quality also plays a role, with Shiji’s 4.53/5 customer support rating compared to Amadeus’s 3.63/5.

Edge: Shiji Group.

Which Has Better Features: Amadeus or Shiji Group?

Amadeus offers core features like distribution, revenue management, and guest CRM—totaling 14 unique capabilities. Its key differentiator is its channel manager and advanced distribution integrations, which are vital for hotels prioritizing demand generation.

Shiji Group, with 84 exclusive features, covers a wider spectrum, including guest profiles, multi-lingual support, task management, mobile check-in, integrated POS, automated reminders, and more. Its extensive automation and integration capabilities support a fully digital hotel environment, often critical for large or tech-forward properties.

Edge: Shiji Group.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Amadeus or Shiji Group?

Customer support is a pivotal factor, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting. Amadeus’s support rating is 3.63/5, with some users reporting difficulty in getting timely responses and ongoing issues, including a review highlighting six years of unresolved problems and poor service in the Netherlands.

Shiji outperforms here, earning a 4.53/5 rating. Reviewers frequently praise its 24/7 support, responsiveness, and proactive assistance, with feedback emphasizing the support team’s professionalism. The recent reviews indicate a support system that actively helps hotels resolve issues and optimize their use of the platform.

Edge: Shiji Group.

Which Has More Integrations: Amadeus or Shiji Group?

Amadeus boasts 104 verified partners, including major brands like SiteMinder, SALTO, and RevControl, offering extensive distribution and revenue tools. Its integrations support a broad ecosystem that suits hotels with complex distribution needs.

Shiji has 64 verified integrations, including familiar names like Amadeus, Stayntouch, and Goki. While fewer in number, Shiji’s integrations are highly compatible with core hotel operations, and its API-driven design allows for flexible customization.

Edge: Amadeus.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Amadeus or Shiji Group?

Recent reviews reveal clearer preferences. Shiji has a higher likelihood to recommend score (8.94/10) versus Amadeus’s 7.75/10, reflecting stronger recent user sentiment. Hotels in the luxury, branded, and city center segments rate Shiji more favorably, citing ease of use and automation.

Amadeus’s reviews are mixed, with some praising its setup and others criticizing ongoing service issues, especially in specific regions. The volume and recency of reviews favor Shiji, indicating a more engaged user base and continuous improvements.

Edge: Shiji Group.

How Much Do Amadeus and Shiji Cost?

Amadeus does not publicly disclose its pricing model, which suggests it may be customized based on hotel size and needs. It is not offered as a freemium or monthly flat-rate, indicating potentially higher upfront or implementation costs.

Shiji charges a base price of $1,200, with no mention of ongoing monthly fees or implementation costs. Its transparent pricing makes budgeting easier, especially for hotels looking for predictable expenses.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Amadeus?

Hotels that should consider Amadeus include:

  • Hotels with a focus on distribution and revenue management.
  • Midchain properties seeking advanced distribution channels.
  • Hotels needing guest CRM and integrated channel management.
  • Properties that prefer on-premise solutions over cloud-based systems.

Not ideal if your hotel:

  • Prioritizes modern automation and cloud-native features.
  • Needs rapid deployment or frequent updates.
  • Seeks extensive customization beyond distribution and revenue features.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Shiji Group?

Hotels best suited for Shiji include:

  • Independent hotels and small chains wanting a scalable, modern system.
  • Properties valuing automation, mobile check-in, and guest engagement.
  • Hotels seeking an easy-to-learn platform with rapid implementation.
  • Hotels aiming for a fully digital, integrated tech environment.

Not ideal if your hotel:

  • Operates in regions with limited internet connectivity.
  • Requires highly specialized local compliance features.
  • Prefers a traditional, distribution-heavy PMS with minimal automation.

Shiji Daylight PMS vs Amadeus Property Management: The Bottom Line for Hotels

The core difference lies in their approach: Amadeus emphasizes distribution, revenue, and demand generation, while Shiji focuses on automation, user experience, and scalability. If your hotel’s priority is robust distribution and demand management, Amadeus’s legacy and integrations make it a strong candidate.

However, for hotels seeking a flexible, modern platform with more automation, ease of use, and recent positive reviews, Shiji is the better option. Its active support and extensive features position it as the future-proof choice for hotels embracing digital transformation.

If your hotel values proven distribution capabilities and has a complex revenue structure, go with Amadeus. If you want a scalable, user-friendly system that boosts operational efficiency and guest experiences, Shiji is the smarter decision.

How Much Do Amadeus Property Management and Shiji Daylight PMS Cost?

Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.

Amadeus Amadeus Shiji Group Shiji Group
Starting Price From $1,200/mo

Which Features Does Amadeus Property Management Have That Shiji Daylight PMS Doesn't (and Vice Versa)?

According to HTR's product database, Amadeus Property Management and Shiji Daylight PMS share 14 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.

Feature Amadeus Amadeus Shiji Group Shiji Group
Centralized user & role management
Channel Manager
Guest CRM
Guest profiles
Multi-lingual
On premise
Online Check-in
Revenue management module
Tablet/Kiosk Check-in
Task Management

Showing top differences. 76 more features differ between these products.

Real-World Results: Amadeus vs Shiji Group by Business Goal

We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.

Increase Operational Efficiency
Amadeus Amadeus

No published case study for this goal yet.

Shiji Group Ruby Hotels Mid-Size
+ Successfully went live with 21 hotels across Europe, with additional hotel openings planned in the near future.
+ Equipped with the level of API connectivity they needed to create connections between disparate data sets that would be impossible to achieve manually.
+ Mentions of Technology have increased by 2.5 points, Reception by 3 points and Service by 3.5 points.

"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."

Lucas Höfer
Lucas Höfer
Group Director of Systems and Innovation...
Improve Guest Experience
Amadeus Amadeus

No published case study for this goal yet.

Shiji Group Sunborn London Small
+ �s fully integrated tech stack, the team unified their data, simplified workflows, and elevated every touchpoint of the guest journey.
+ From seamless check-in and instant mobile ordering to real-time housekeeping updates, everything now runs faster, smoother, and with less effort.
+ Most importantly, technology now works in the background, freeing up staff to focus on what really matters: delivering memorable, personalized experiences that live up to Sunborn

"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."

V
Vasilis Giannios
Operations Manager, Sunborn London

Amadeus vs Shiji Group: The Bottom Line

Amadeus
Amadeus
3.9/5 from 4 reviews

Unique capabilities

Channel Manager Revenue management module On premise Guest CRM
3.5/5 ease of use 3.6/5 support 104 integrations
Visit Profile
Shiji Group
Shiji Group
4.5/5 from 34 reviews

What hoteliers love

Ease of Use 97% positive

Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. Thi... Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. This ease of use is highlighted in reviews citing accessible training materials, intuitive design, and efficient task performance.

Support Team 83% positive

The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and help... The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and helpfulness of the support personnel, which greatly aids in smoother operations.

Implementation 83% positive

The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implemen... The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implementation team. However, a few users suggest that reducing the implementation timeline could further improve the experience.

Where hoteliers push back

Reporting and Analytics 62% negative

While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific re... While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific requests include enhanced summary reports, detailed billing, and faster report generation processes.

System Speed 57% negative

Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operat... Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operations. Users urge improvements in system speed to enhance overall efficiency.

Ranks higher for

Large (75-199 rooms) #11 vs #26
Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) #31 vs #47
Small (10-24 rooms) #53 vs #56
X-Large (200+ rooms) #22 vs #26

Unique capabilities

Guest profiles Multi-lingual Centralized user & role management Task Management Tablet/Kiosk Check-in
4.6/5 ease of use 4.5/5 support 64 integrations
Visit Website

Where the ratings diverge most

Overall Rating Amadeus 2.5 vs 0.0 (+2.5)
Ease of Use Shiji Group 4.6 vs 3.5 (+1.1)
Customer Support Shiji Group 4.5 vs 3.6 (+0.9)
Value for Money Shiji Group 4.5 vs 3.0 (+1.5)
Onboarding Shiji Group 4.4 vs 3.8 (+0.6)

Frequently Asked Questions About Amadeus Property Management vs Shiji Daylight PMS

Can Amadeus Property Management replace Shiji Daylight PMS?

It depends on your requirements. Amadeus Property Management and Shiji Daylight PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Amadeus Property Management offers 104 verified integration partners, while Shiji Daylight PMS offers 64. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.

Which is better for small or independent hotels?

Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Shiji Daylight PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 3.5/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.

Do Amadeus Property Management or Shiji Daylight PMS offer a free plan?

Amadeus Property Management: No. Shiji Daylight PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.

How Does HTR Evaluate and Rank Amadeus Property Management and Shiji Daylight PMS?

The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Amadeus has an HT Score of 0 and Shiji Group has 75. Here is how the score is calculated.

Criteria Group Weight What It Measures
Customer Ratings & Reviews

How highly do users recommend this product?

Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories

The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias.

Partner Ecosystem

How highly do tech partners recommend this company?

Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality

Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack.

Customer Centricity

How customer-centric is this organization?

Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness

Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features.

Reach, Staying Power & Resources

How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing?

Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score

Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity.

Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →

Get personalized product recommendations

Product recommendations advisor

Ghostel icon

Let´s lookup your hotel information