The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 38 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Amadeus shines , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and On premise.
Shiji Group shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
Side-by-side ratings based on 38 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 4 | 34 |
After analyzing 38 verified reviews, Amadeus users most value its , while Shiji Group users highlight ease of use, support team, implementation. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Support Team
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation
▾
|
|
|
+
Training Materials
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | #56 1 reviews | #53 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #47 1 reviews | #31 17 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #26 2 reviews | #11 13 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #26 0 reviews | #22 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #50 1 reviews | #33 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #42 2 reviews | #24 25 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #34 3 reviews | #22 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay | #51 0 reviews | #45 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #37 1 reviews | #33 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #38 2 reviews | #30 8 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #41 0 reviews | #14 5 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #5 14 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue growth. Both Amadeus Property Management by Amadeus and Shiji Daylight PMS aim to streamline your hotel operations, but they differ significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and specific needs, so understanding these differences is key.
Amadeus offers a more traditional, well-established solution with a focus on distribution and revenue management, whereas Shiji provides a modern, cloud-native platform with extensive automation and integration capabilities. Which one aligns better with your current and future goals?
Amadeus Property Management has been around since 1987, targeting midchain and independent hotels with its comprehensive distribution and revenue tools. Its core strength lies in distribution integrations, channel management, and guest CRM, making it suitable for hotels looking to maximize occupancy and demand through robust distribution channels.
In contrast, Shiji Group, founded in 1998, emphasizes a scalable, cloud-native approach designed for hotels of all sizes. It offers a broad array of features—84 exclusive ones—such as mobile check-in, guest messaging, and automation tools, making it particularly appealing for hotels wanting a flexible, modern system.
One major contrast is the user feedback: Shiji has more recent and numerous reviews (32 reviews in the last six months versus only 4 for Amadeus), indicating a more active user base and ongoing support. Shiji’s higher review scores (74.69/100 overall) and recent positive feedback suggest it’s gaining popularity, especially among hotels seeking advanced automation. Do these differences matter more to your hotel’s operational style and growth plans?
Your choice depends on your hotel type and priorities. If your hotel needs a well-established, distribution-driven PMS with advanced revenue management, Amadeus is a suitable candidate. Its strengths include a channel manager, guest CRM, and a proven track record for mid-sized hotels aiming for demand generation.
However, if your hotel values a modern, flexible platform that simplifies daily operations and enhances guest engagement, Shiji Group is the clear winner. Its features like online check-in, guest messaging, automation, and a user-friendly interface are ideal for hotels wanting quick deployment and scalable improvements.
For hotels seeking to innovate and automate, Shiji’s broad feature set and recent positive reviews make it the smarter choice, especially considering its higher customer satisfaction and active support system.
Ease of use is critical for staff adoption and operational efficiency. Amadeus scores 3.5/5 for ease of use, with some users describing its interface as user-friendly but citing issues with system speed and limited customization. On the other hand, Shiji excels with a 4.63/5 score, with users praising its intuitive design, quick training, and seamless daily task management.
Shiji’s modern, cloud-native architecture makes onboarding smoother, with many reviewers noting that new team members pick it up quickly. Support quality also plays a role, with Shiji’s 4.53/5 customer support rating compared to Amadeus’s 3.63/5.
Edge: Shiji Group.
Amadeus offers core features like distribution, revenue management, and guest CRM—totaling 14 unique capabilities. Its key differentiator is its channel manager and advanced distribution integrations, which are vital for hotels prioritizing demand generation.
Shiji Group, with 84 exclusive features, covers a wider spectrum, including guest profiles, multi-lingual support, task management, mobile check-in, integrated POS, automated reminders, and more. Its extensive automation and integration capabilities support a fully digital hotel environment, often critical for large or tech-forward properties.
Edge: Shiji Group.
Customer support is a pivotal factor, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting. Amadeus’s support rating is 3.63/5, with some users reporting difficulty in getting timely responses and ongoing issues, including a review highlighting six years of unresolved problems and poor service in the Netherlands.
Shiji outperforms here, earning a 4.53/5 rating. Reviewers frequently praise its 24/7 support, responsiveness, and proactive assistance, with feedback emphasizing the support team’s professionalism. The recent reviews indicate a support system that actively helps hotels resolve issues and optimize their use of the platform.
Edge: Shiji Group.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified partners, including major brands like SiteMinder, SALTO, and RevControl, offering extensive distribution and revenue tools. Its integrations support a broad ecosystem that suits hotels with complex distribution needs.
Shiji has 64 verified integrations, including familiar names like Amadeus, Stayntouch, and Goki. While fewer in number, Shiji’s integrations are highly compatible with core hotel operations, and its API-driven design allows for flexible customization.
Edge: Amadeus.
Recent reviews reveal clearer preferences. Shiji has a higher likelihood to recommend score (8.94/10) versus Amadeus’s 7.75/10, reflecting stronger recent user sentiment. Hotels in the luxury, branded, and city center segments rate Shiji more favorably, citing ease of use and automation.
Amadeus’s reviews are mixed, with some praising its setup and others criticizing ongoing service issues, especially in specific regions. The volume and recency of reviews favor Shiji, indicating a more engaged user base and continuous improvements.
Edge: Shiji Group.
Amadeus does not publicly disclose its pricing model, which suggests it may be customized based on hotel size and needs. It is not offered as a freemium or monthly flat-rate, indicating potentially higher upfront or implementation costs.
Shiji charges a base price of $1,200, with no mention of ongoing monthly fees or implementation costs. Its transparent pricing makes budgeting easier, especially for hotels looking for predictable expenses.
Hotels that should consider Amadeus include:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Hotels best suited for Shiji include:
Not ideal if your hotel:
The core difference lies in their approach: Amadeus emphasizes distribution, revenue, and demand generation, while Shiji focuses on automation, user experience, and scalability. If your hotel’s priority is robust distribution and demand management, Amadeus’s legacy and integrations make it a strong candidate.
However, for hotels seeking a flexible, modern platform with more automation, ease of use, and recent positive reviews, Shiji is the better option. Its active support and extensive features position it as the future-proof choice for hotels embracing digital transformation.
If your hotel values proven distribution capabilities and has a complex revenue structure, go with Amadeus. If you want a scalable, user-friendly system that boosts operational efficiency and guest experiences, Shiji is the smarter decision.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Amadeus Property Management and Shiji Daylight PMS share 14 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Task Management |
Showing top differences. 76 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. Thi... Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. This ease of use is highlighted in reviews citing accessible training materials, intuitive design, and efficient task performance.
The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and help... The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and helpfulness of the support personnel, which greatly aids in smoother operations.
The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implemen... The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implementation team. However, a few users suggest that reducing the implementation timeline could further improve the experience.
Where hoteliers push back
While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific re... While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific requests include enhanced summary reports, detailed billing, and faster report generation processes.
Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operat... Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operations. Users urge improvements in system speed to enhance overall efficiency.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Amadeus Property Management and Shiji Daylight PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Amadeus Property Management offers 104 verified integration partners, while Shiji Daylight PMS offers 64. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Shiji Daylight PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 3.5/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Amadeus Property Management: No. Shiji Daylight PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Amadeus has an HT Score of 0 and Shiji Group has 75. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor