The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 46 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Amadeus shines .
SIHOT shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Mobile App and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
Side-by-side ratings based on 46 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 4 | 42 |
After analyzing 46 verified reviews, Amadeus users most value its , while SIHOT users highlight advanced support and training, quick issue resolution, integrations and custom interfaces. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Advanced Support and Training
▾
|
|
|
+
Quick Issue Resolution
▾
|
|
|
+
Integrations and Custom Interfaces
▾
|
|
|
+
Flexibility and Adaptability
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
User Interface and Modernization
▾
|
|
|
−
Financial Reporting and Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
Detailed Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #56 1 reviews | #40 9 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #47 1 reviews | #26 21 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #26 2 reviews | #16 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #26 0 reviews | #30 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #50 1 reviews | #35 15 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #42 2 reviews | #30 11 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #34 3 reviews | #25 13 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #51 0 reviews | #28 5 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #37 1 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #38 2 reviews | #17 31 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #41 0 reviews | — |
| Middle East | — | #25 1 reviews |
Choosing the right Property Management System (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Amadeus Property Management and SIHOT both aim to streamline management tasks, but they diverge significantly in their market presence, reviews, and feature sets. Amadeus, with only four reviews, provides a limited view of its effectiveness, whereas SIHOT boasts 39 reviews with recent feedback, giving you a clearer picture of ongoing performance. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Both Amadeus and SIHOT serve the hotel management space, but their approaches vary. Amadeus offers an all-in-one property management solution emphasizing distribution integrations and ease of use, especially for independent and midchain hotels. SIHOT, on the other hand, presents a modular, flexible system with extensive features, including multi-property management and advanced reporting.
Amadeus’s limited recent reviews—none in the last six months—suggest a lack of current user feedback, while SIHOT’s recent and plentiful reviews reflect ongoing user experience and support. Does your hotel prioritize a broad feature set and active support, or is a simplified, easy-to-implement solution sufficient?
If your hotel requires a straightforward, easy-to-use platform with strong distribution integration to drive demand, Amadeus is a solid pick. Its user-friendly interface and focus on demand generation suit mid-sized and independent hotels looking to streamline operations without complex customization.
Conversely, if your hotel needs a highly flexible, feature-rich PMS capable of multi-property management, extensive reporting, and modular options, SIHOT is the better fit. Its multiple deployment options and broad feature set support complex operational needs, making it ideal for larger or multi-location properties.
In summary, choose Amadeus if simplicity and distribution are your priorities. Opt for SIHOT if you need depth in features and adaptability.
Amadeus scores a 3.5/5 for ease of use, with some users describing its setup as straightforward, especially due to its simple interface. However, its limited recent reviews suggest that ongoing support and user satisfaction may fluctuate. Users mention that initial onboarding is manageable but might be challenging for staff unfamiliar with PMS systems.
SIHOT, with a 4.49/5 ease of use rating, receives consistent praise for its intuitive, modular interface and straightforward navigation. Its online training and support are highly rated, with many users noting its clear layout and quick learning curve.
Edge: SIHOT.
SIHOT offers a significantly broader feature set, with 30 unique capabilities like gift vouchers, booking engine, mobile check-in, integrated payment terminals, guest communication, automated reminders, and advanced revenue management tools. These features cater to diverse operational needs and digital guest experiences.
Amadeus, with no exclusive features, provides core property management functions and distribution integrations but lacks the extensive modules SIHOT offers. Its limited feature count makes it less suitable for hotels seeking specialized, modern functionalities.
Edge: SIHOT.
Customer support ratings favor SIHOT, which scores 4.62/5 compared to Amadeus’s 3.63/5. Reviewers highlight SIHOT’s quick, effective support, with many praising its online training resources and proactive communication.
Amadeus’s support receives mixed feedback, with some users reporting delays and unresolved issues. One reviewer criticizes its service in the Netherlands, citing no callbacks and ongoing problems despite years of use.
Edge: SIHOT.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified integration partners, including major players like RateBoard, Revinate, SiteMinder, and Oaky. Its extensive partner network supports diverse distribution, revenue management, and operational tools, making it suitable for hotels needing broad connectivity.
SIHOT has 60 verified partners, including key players such as Profitroom, Cendyn, and Zaplox. Its integrations support essential hotel functions, but it has fewer verified partners overall.
Edge: Amadeus.
Based on recent reviews, SIHOT is rated 4.77/5 overall, with a 93% likelihood to recommend, reflecting strong user satisfaction. Its reviews praise its multi-property management, support services, and feature richness.
Amadeus’s overall rating is 2.5/5, with a 78% likelihood to recommend, but no recent reviews challenge its current usability or support. Many users have expressed frustration over ongoing issues and limited active feedback.
Edge: SIHOT.
Both Amadeus and SIHOT do not publicly disclose specific pricing details. They operate on customized quotes based on hotel size, location, and feature requirements, so your team will need to contact sales representatives for precise quotes.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive modules, advanced reporting, or multi-property management.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, minimal setup or limited feature requirements.
The core difference is that SIHOT offers a broad, modular system with extensive features and strong recent reviews, while Amadeus provides a more limited, distribution-focused platform with fewer recent insights. SIHOT’s versatile and rich feature set makes it suitable for hotels seeking comprehensive management tools, especially in multi-property contexts.
Choose SIHOT if your hotel requires depth, adaptability, and active support, as it has a proven track record with recent, highly positive reviews. Its high ratings across segments confirm its value for hotels prioritizing operational sophistication and guest experience.
Opt for Amadeus if your hotel mainly needs distribution integration and straightforward property management, and if you can accept limited recent feedback. Its smaller footprint may suit independent or smaller properties with basic needs.
In summary, SIHOT stands out for active user engagement, feature richness, and support. Amadeus might serve niche cases where distribution and ease of setup are the priority, but it appears less aligned with current hotel needs.
According to HTR's product database, Amadeus Property Management and SIHOT share 18 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Task Management |
Showing top differences. 18 more features differ between these products.
Ranks higher for
What hoteliers love
Many users commend the advanced support team and the online training academy, which make it easy to resolve issues and reduce the learning curve for n... Many users commend the advanced support team and the online training academy, which make it easy to resolve issues and reduce the learning curve for new employees. Regular CRM calls are also appreciated for keeping open lines of communication.
SIHOT is praised for its quick and effective issue resolution capabilities. However, a few reviews criticize the initial reluctance to take responsibi... SIHOT is praised for its quick and effective issue resolution capabilities. However, a few reviews criticize the initial reluctance to take responsibility for certain problems, stressing an area for improvement in communication.
SIHOT significantly eases integration with other systems by actively supporting and participating in the creation of custom interfaces. This ensures s... SIHOT significantly eases integration with other systems by actively supporting and participating in the creation of custom interfaces. This ensures seamless operations and adds to the flexibility needed for modern hospitality businesses.
Where hoteliers push back
There are calls for a more modern and intuitive update of SIHOT's user interface, with users pointing out that the current system design feels dated c... There are calls for a more modern and intuitive update of SIHOT's user interface, with users pointing out that the current system design feels dated compared to other solutions on the market.
While useful, some users wish for quicker adaptation in financial report customization to fit specific regional financial requirements better. This fe... While useful, some users wish for quicker adaptation in financial report customization to fit specific regional financial requirements better. This feedback suggests a need for enhanced customization capabilities.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Amadeus Property Management and SIHOT share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Amadeus Property Management offers 104 verified integration partners, while SIHOT offers 60. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. SIHOT leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 3.5/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Amadeus Property Management: No. SIHOT: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Amadeus has an HT Score of 0 and SIHOT has 74. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor