The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 265 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Amadeus shines , with exclusive features like Review Widgets and Google AMP Markup.
SHR Group shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.8/5) , with exclusive features like ADA Compliant and Security Protocals (SSL/HTTPS).
Side-by-side ratings based on 265 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 3 | 262 |
After analyzing 265 verified reviews, Amadeus users most value its , while SHR Group users highlight proactive client management, website design, reporting and analytics. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Proactive Client Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Website Design
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
Digital Marketing
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Voucher System
▾
|
|
|
−
Template Limitations
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Website Design vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #24 1 reviews | #9 30 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #23 1 reviews | #1 208 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #16 0 reviews | #6 13 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #12 0 reviews | #14 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #25 1 reviews | #4 115 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #19 1 reviews | #2 163 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #18 0 reviews | #2 84 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #12 1 reviews | #4 16 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #18 0 reviews | #11 8 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #19 1 reviews | #2 244 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #18 0 reviews | #6 5 reviews |
Choosing the right website design platform can significantly impact your hotel's digital presence, guest engagement, and revenue. Both Amadeus and SHR Group aim to serve hoteliers but approach the category differently—Amadeus offers a comprehensive hotel-specific website solution, while SHR Group provides tailored, guest-centric website design combined with digital marketing tools. Which platform better aligns with your hotel’s needs depends on your priorities: extensive distribution vs. bespoke design and marketing.
Amadeus’s offering is built on a high-performing, secure CMS designed specifically for hotels, focusing heavily on conversions through OTA integrations and global distribution access. SHR Group emphasizes visually appealing, customer-focused websites paired with strategic digital marketing, backed by advanced analytics and AI tools.
Are you seeking a platform with a broad distribution network and channel management or a highly personalized website with integrated marketing? The answer shapes which product will serve your property best.
Both platforms aim to improve your hotel's online visibility and guest experience but differ sharply in approach and user feedback. Amadeus is known for its extensive OTA channel integration and global distribution network, making it a strong choice if your hotel relies heavily on OTA bookings or operates within a large group needing multi-property management.
In contrast, SHR Group’s strengths lie in its high-quality website design, ease of navigation, and digital marketing features, making it ideal if your hotel prioritizes direct bookings, branding, and guest engagement. While Amadeus touts 104 verified partners and a focus on distribution, SHR Group offers 81 verified partners but more flexibility with website customization and marketing tools.
Additionally, recent reviews favor SHR Group, with a higher review count (169 vs. 3) and a better recent score, indicating more current user satisfaction. Amadeus’s reviews are mostly older and less positive, highlighting ongoing struggles with usability and support. Are you willing to compromise on distribution breadth for a more engaging digital experience?
If your hotel needs a platform with extensive OTA reach, global distribution, and a focus on channel management, go with Amadeus. It excels at maximizing visibility across meta sites and offers a broad partner network, which can be crucial for larger hotels or chains.
If your hotel values a beautifully designed, user-friendly website, coupled with strong digital marketing and AI-driven tools to boost direct bookings, SHR Group is the better choice. Its clients report increased revenue, higher conversion rates, and improved guest engagement, supported by a suite of marketing and analytics features.
For properties seeking integrated solutions that drive direct bookings with personalized websites, SHR Group’s offering is more aligned. Conversely, if your strategy hinges on extensive distribution and OTA management, Amadeus stands out despite its mixed reviews.
Ease of use heavily favors SHR Group, which boasts a 4.69/5 user rating and a 4.66/5 onboarding score. Clients praise its intuitive drag-and-drop page builder, straightforward CMS, and responsive support team, reflected in numerous positive reviews emphasizing ease of navigation and quick setup.
Amadeus users report a 3/5 ease rating and a 2.67/5 onboarding score, with reviews citing complex tasks, UI struggles, and inconsistent support, particularly with their platform’s usability. Some users describe their experience as “a struggle” and express frustration with platform complexity and support responsiveness.
Edge: SHR Group.
Amadeus offers 11 features: including OTA channel management, a booking engine, and review widgets—two are exclusive, Google AMP Markup and a review widget—highlighting its focus on distribution and CRO. SHR Group provides 14 features, with 5 unique, including ADA compliance, social media integrations, SEO plugins, a drag-and-drop page builder, and security protocols—making it more versatile for website customization and accessibility.
While Amadeus concentrates on channel management and CRO tools, SHR Group emphasizes website personalization, user engagement, and SEO-enhanced features. For a hotel seeking more website-centric functionalities, SHR Group’s broader feature set offers more options.
Edge: SHR Group.
Customer support ratings clearly favor SHR Group, with a 4.85/5 score versus Amadeus’s 2.67/5. Clients consistently praise SHR Group’s proactive, knowledgeable support team, quick responses, and dedicated account management, often describing them as “amazing to work with.”
Amadeus’s lower rating reflects ongoing support frustrations, with reviews criticizing unresponsive account managers and UI training gaps. Given the importance of reliable support, SHR Group provides a safer bet.
Edge: SHR Group.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified partners, compared to SHR Group’s 81, with 39 shared integrations. Shared partners include major industry players like Profitroom, GuestRevu, and Stayntouch, but Amadeus’s larger network includes additional specialized tools like HOTELTIME and Becurious.
While Amadeus’s broader partner network offers more options for distribution and management, SHR Group’s integrations are well-regarded and sufficient for most hotel needs. If extensive third-party integrations are critical, Amadeus has the edge; otherwise, SHR Group’s integration quality suffices.
Edge: Amadeus.
Recent reviews heavily favor SHR Group, with a score of 9.54/10 from 169 reviews versus Amadeus’s 5.67/10 from 3 reviews. Hotels in diverse segments, especially boutique and city center properties, rate SHR Group’s website design, support, and ROI much higher.
Amadeus’s reviews are fewer, older, and often mention dissatisfaction with usability and support. For current user satisfaction, SHR Group is the clear leader.
Edge: SHR Group.
Amadeus does not publish standard pricing, but it typically involves custom quotes, with no freemium or trial options noted. This lack of transparency makes budgeting difficult, and costs could be significant for smaller hotels.
SHR Group charges a base fee of $900/month, with no trial or freemium plans. This straightforward pricing offers predictability, though it may be higher than some smaller-scale competitors.
Given the transparency and the strong support reputation, SHR Group’s pricing seems more accessible and predictable.
Edge: SHR Group.
Hotels that benefit most from Amadeus are:
Not ideal if you prefer a visually driven website or focus on guest engagement through marketing. Smaller, boutique hotels seeking a high-conversion website may find Amadeus’s platform less suitable.
SHR Group is ideal for:
Not ideal if your hotel relies solely on OTA channels or requires extensive distribution management. Smaller properties with limited budgets might find the $900/month cost challenging.
Amadeus specializes in channel management, distribution, and global visibility, making it suitable for large hotels or chains with heavy OTA reliance. Its website solutions are less favored currently due to usability issues and limited recent reviews.
SHR Group focuses on guest-centric website design, digital marketing, and AI-driven tools that help increase direct bookings and revenue. Its stronger recent reviews, higher ratings, and more comprehensive features make it the better choice overall.
If your hotel prioritizes a beautifully designed, easy-to-manage website with strong support, SHR Group is the clear winner. Conversely, if distribution breadth and OTA presence are your primary goals, Amadeus remains a viable option despite its current challenges.
In conclusion, for most hotels looking to improve online presence, revenue, and guest satisfaction, SHR Group offers a more compelling, well-reviewed solution.
According to HTR's product database, Amadeus – Web Solutions and SHR Website Design share 9 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ADA Compliant | ||
| Drag and Drop Page Builder | ||
| Google AMP Markup | ||
| Review Widgets | ||
| SEO Plugins | ||
| Security Protocals (SSL/HTTPS) | ||
| Social Media Integrations |
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Clients commend the dedicated client management team for their proactive and responsive support. Account managers are often described as knowledgeable... Clients commend the dedicated client management team for their proactive and responsive support. Account managers are often described as knowledgeable, invested in client success, and ready with insights and recommendations to drive business growth.
SRH Group is highly regarded for its modern, visually striking, and user-friendly website designs that enhance the guest booking experience. Clients n... SRH Group is highly regarded for its modern, visually striking, and user-friendly website designs that enhance the guest booking experience. Clients noted that these designs have significantly contributed to increased visibility and higher conversion rates. However, some clients expressed a need for more flexibility in customization and quicker turnaround times.
The extensive and in-depth reporting features provided by SRH Group are consistently praised, offering clear insights into performance trends and acti... The extensive and in-depth reporting features provided by SRH Group are consistently praised, offering clear insights into performance trends and actionable data that help hoteliers make informed decisions. Users find these reports crucial for strategy adjustments and performance tracking.
Where hoteliers push back
The voucher system implemented by SRH Group received mixed reviews. While appreciated for driving additional revenue, several users highlighted areas... The voucher system implemented by SRH Group received mixed reviews. While appreciated for driving additional revenue, several users highlighted areas for potential enhancements, including easier voucher management and partial redemptions.
While SRH Group's templates are generally praised for being visually appealing, some users find them restrictive and desire more options for customiza... While SRH Group's templates are generally praised for being visually appealing, some users find them restrictive and desire more options for customization to better reflect their unique brand identities.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Amadeus – Web Solutions and SHR Website Design share many core Website Design features, but each has unique capabilities. Amadeus – Web Solutions offers 104 verified integration partners, while SHR Website Design offers 81. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. SHR Website Design leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 3.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Amadeus – Web Solutions: No. SHR Website Design: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Website Design vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Amadeus has an HT Score of 0 and SHR Group has 43. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor