The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 190 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
apaleo GmbH shines in ROI , with exclusive features like Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader and Payment Requests.
Preno shines when it comes to user-friendly interface , with exclusive features like Guest CRM and Revenue management module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 190 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 30 | 160 |
After analyzing 190 verified reviews, apaleo GmbH users most value its frequent updates and community engagement, customization and flexibility, open api and integration, while Preno users highlight user-friendly interface, customer support, channel management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Frequent Updates and Community Engagement
▾
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
+
Open API and Integration
▾
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
+
App Store and Third-Party Integrations
▾
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting Capabilities
▾
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
−
Group and Booking Management
▾
|
−
Mobile Application
▾
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #42 7 reviews | #13 80 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #27 19 reviews | #32 15 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #41 1 reviews | #46 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #14 3 reviews | #39 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #34 14 reviews | #14 65 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #43 4 reviews | #12 53 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #40 4 reviews | #21 17 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #19 9 reviews | #8 26 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #38 2 reviews | #27 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #18 26 reviews | #25 13 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #20 3 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #13 2 reviews |
Choosing between Apaleo Open PMS and Preno depends on your hotel’s specific needs. Both platforms aim to streamline operations, but they do so with different emphases and strengths. Apaleo offers a flexible, API-first system tailored for larger, multi-property groups or those seeking extensive customization. Preno, on the other hand, is a straightforward, user-friendly solution ideal for boutique hotels, motels, and properties prioritizing ease of use.
Both products solve core property management problems like reservations, billing, and guest communication. Yet, they diverge in feature depth, scalability, and integration options. Which system aligns better with your operational complexity and growth plans?
Apaleo’s open platform is designed for hotels and serviced apartment groups that want to build a customized tech ecosystem. It excels with its API-first design, enabling integrations across 120 verified partners like TrustYou, SiteMinder, and Fairmas, making it suitable for properties that require advanced, tailored functionalities.
Preno focuses on ease of use and simplicity, with a more limited but impactful feature set. Its 17 verified integrations include popular tools like Xero and SiteMinder, making it perfect for boutique hotels, motels, and properties with straightforward needs.
While Apaleo’s extensive customization benefits large or growing hotel chains, Preno’s streamlined approach suits smaller properties or those new to PMS adoption. Do you prefer a flexible, scalable platform or a simple, effective system?
If your hotel needs a highly customizable system capable of integrating with a wide range of third-party tools, go with Apaleo. Its open API and robust partner network support complex operations, multi-property management, and future growth.
If your priority is an easy-to-use, quick-to-implement PMS that simplifies daily tasks, choose Preno. Its intuitive interface, strong support, and essential integrations make it ideal for boutique hotels, motels, and small to medium properties.
For properties focused on rapid setup, minimal training, and reliable support, Preno outperforms. Conversely, if your team values flexibility, customization, and scalable architecture, Apaleo is the better fit.
Apaleo boasts a high ease-of-use rating at 4.9/5, with reviewers praising its friendly interface and quick onboarding. However, its open API and extensive features can introduce some complexity for new users, requiring a learning curve.
Preno’s interface scores slightly lower at 4.78/5 but is still regarded as very user-friendly, with many users highlighting how intuitive and straightforward the system is to operate. Its simple design minimizes training time and accelerates staff adoption.
Edge: Apaleo. Its ease of use is slightly higher, especially for users familiar with customizable platforms, though Preno’s straightforward approach remains very accessible.
Apaleo offers 25 shared features plus 12 unique capabilities like multi-lingual support, task management, online checkout, and digital registration. Its features are designed to support complex operations, multi-currency handling, and extensive customization.
Preno provides 25 shared features and 5 exclusive ones, including a guest CRM, revenue management, native email marketing, EPoS, and a booking engine. These features focus on streamlining guest management and revenue optimization, ideal for properties seeking simplicity and automation.
In terms of raw feature count, Apaleo’s broader suite provides more options for customization, but Preno’s targeted features deliver effective operational support with less complexity.
Edge: Apaleo. Its larger feature set and specialization in automation and multi-language support set it apart.
Apaleo’s support team scores 4.83/5, with reviews emphasizing responsiveness and the quality of assistance, especially during onboarding. Users mention that Apaleo’s community and support channels are active, though some desire more direct contact options.
Preno’s support is rated at 4.8/5, with reviewers appreciating their quick, friendly help and proactive communication. The support team’s responsiveness during onboarding and ongoing upgrades is regularly praised.
Edge: Apaleo. Its slightly higher support rating and active community engagement give it an advantage, especially for larger teams needing dependable assistance.
Apaleo boasts 120 verified partners, including popular integrations like TrustYou, Fairmas, and Hotelkit, providing extensive options for customizing workflows. Its API-first approach allows seamless connection to a broad ecosystem, supporting complex, multi-system setups.
Preno has 17 verified partners, with integrations primarily focused on Xero, SiteMinder, and a handful of other core tools. While more limited, these integrations cover essential functions for small to medium properties.
In terms of sheer variety, Apaleo’s ecosystem dominates, offering more flexibility for complex setups.
Edge: Apaleo. Its larger, more diverse integration network makes it ideal for properties that rely on a wide array of third-party tools.
Preno’s overall rating is higher at 4.73/5 with 144 reviews, compared to Apaleo’s 0/5 from 29 reviews. The recent reviews for Preno, often from boutique hotels and motels, emphasize its ease of use, support, and feature set.
Apaleo, despite a high community rating (9.69/10), has limited reviews and a lower overall rating, primarily because its reviews are sparse and recent feedback is scarce. The limited reviews make it harder to gauge satisfaction comprehensively.
Considering review recency and volume, Preno is the more trusted choice among hoteliers.
Edge: Preno.
Apaleo’s base price is $900 per month, with no free tier or trial, reflecting its enterprise focus. Its pricing structure suits larger properties or groups seeking extensive customization and integrations, justifying the investment.
Preno charges $800 per month, also without a free plan or trial, targeting small-to-medium hotels and motels. Its pricing is competitive for properties that prioritize simplicity and support over extensive customization.
Both systems are similarly priced on a monthly basis, but the value depends on your hotel’s complexity and feature needs.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a quick, plug-and-play solution without the need for extensive customization.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Apaleo offers a flexible, scalable platform with a vast partner network, ideal for large, multi-property groups or those seeking tailored solutions. Its open API and extensive features support complex operations but require more technical knowledge to maximize.
Preno is a streamlined, user-friendly PMS designed for smaller properties or boutique hotels that need reliable, simple management. Its focus on ease of use, support, and essential integrations make it perfect for hotels prioritizing quick setup and daily operational efficiency.
If your hotel values customization and long-term growth, Apaleo is the clear choice. If you need a reliable, easy-to-implement system that minimizes training and support costs, Preno is the better fit.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $800/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Apaleo Open PMS and Preno share 25 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
| Rate Management | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Task Management |
Showing top differences. 5 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"One of the biggest impacts for us has been the vast array of implementation options available on Apaleo. We’re now able to think outside the box and customise solutions in ways we..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
The platform's commitment to regular updates and community engagement is well-received, with users valuing the attention to feedback and ongoing impro... The platform's commitment to regular updates and community engagement is well-received, with users valuing the attention to feedback and ongoing improvements. The active community provides a support network that enhances the user experience.
Users highlight Apaleo's strength in customization, allowing tailored workflows and process automation. This flexibility helps hotels create systems t... Users highlight Apaleo's strength in customization, allowing tailored workflows and process automation. This flexibility helps hotels create systems that align perfectly with their operational needs, enhancing efficiency and improving guest services.
Apaleo's open API is uniquely praised for enabling custom tech stacks and seamless integration with various systems, greatly enhancing efficiency and... Apaleo's open API is uniquely praised for enabling custom tech stacks and seamless integration with various systems, greatly enhancing efficiency and flexibility in operations. Reviewers appreciate the ability to create their own applications and tech ecosystems, significantly setting Apaleo apart from its competitors.
Where hoteliers push back
While users value the basic reporting functionalities, there is a noticeable demand for advanced reporting features within Apaleo. Many find current o... While users value the basic reporting functionalities, there is a noticeable demand for advanced reporting features within Apaleo. Many find current options limited, leading to reliance on additional tools for deeper analytics.
Apaleo's group management features receive praise for user-friendliness, but some reviews note areas for improvement, particularly concerning comprehe... Apaleo's group management features receive praise for user-friendliness, but some reviews note areas for improvement, particularly concerning comprehensive functionality and intuitiveness.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during wee... The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during weekends or busy periods. Responsiveness and direct contact with support staff are valued highly.
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
Where hoteliers push back
Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better str... Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better strategic decision-making. Some users expressed a need for customized reporting features.
Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with... Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with offline functionality and more feature depth would improve usability, especially for managers on the go.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Apaleo Open PMS and Preno share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Apaleo Open PMS offers 120 verified integration partners, while Preno offers 17. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Apaleo Open PMS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.8/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Apaleo Open PMS: No. Preno: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. apaleo GmbH has an HT Score of 78 and Preno has 80. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor