The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 29 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
HPE/Aruba shines .
Reguest shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Messaging Guest Surveys and Team Messaging.
Side-by-side ratings based on 29 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 29 |
After analyzing 29 verified reviews, HPE/Aruba users most value its , while Reguest users highlight communication efficiency, user-friendly interface, customization and flexibility. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| HPE/Aruba |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Communication Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Statistics and Reporting
▾
|
|
|
−
Modular and Template Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Accessibility
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Guest Messaging Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | HPE/Aruba |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #9 11 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #16 13 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | HPE/Aruba |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #15 11 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #15 10 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | — | #23 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #12 5 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | HPE/Aruba |
|
|---|---|---|
| Europe ▾ | — | #6 28 reviews |
Choosing between Aruba Central by HPE/Aruba and ReGuest Guest Communication hinges on what your hotel needs most. Aruba Central is primarily a network management platform for IT infrastructure, not designed for guest messaging or CRM. ReGuest, on the other hand, specializes in guest communication, boasting a high review score and recent positive feedback. For hoteliers seeking a dedicated guest messaging solution, ReGuest clearly stands out.
While Aruba Central offers extensive network control, its lack of guest-focused features makes it unsuitable for your team's guest interaction goals. Conversely, ReGuest’s focus on communication workflows and CRM tools addresses your guest engagement needs directly. The core question remains: do you need network management or guest messaging? Reguest is the better choice here.
Aruba Central is tailored to IT teams managing expansive network environments across multiple properties. It excels at providing real-time analytics, centralized hardware control, and security management, but it offers no functionalities for guest communication or CRM. ReGuest, with its 29 recent reviews and a 97% likelihood to recommend, is built for hotel teams prioritizing guest engagement, automation, and personalized communication.
If your hotel requires reliable network management across many locations, Aruba Central might seem appealing. However, if your primary goal is improving guest messaging, automating communication workflows, and increasing guest satisfaction, ReGuest’s high rating and feature set make it the preferable option. Which area aligns more with your hotel’s current priorities?
If your hotel needs a dedicated guest communication system that enhances guest engagement, go with ReGuest. Its comprehensive feature set—including omnichannel messaging, chatbots, automated workflows, and integrations with third-party booking systems—makes it ideal for hotels aiming to boost guest satisfaction and loyalty. It’s especially suited for mid-sized and boutique hotels seeking a flexible, user-friendly CRM.
If, however, your team’s focus is on network management, security, and infrastructure control, Aruba Central remains the logical choice. It’s designed for IT administrators managing extensive hardware setups, offering centralized control and analytics to optimize network performance. But for your team’s guest-facing needs, ReGuest delivers a more targeted solution.
ReGuest’s ease of use is reflected in its impressive 4.83/5 rating based on 29 recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface and quick onboarding process. Many reviewers mention that staff adoption is straightforward thanks to its clear layout and user-friendly features. Support from ReGuest is highly rated at 4.97/5, emphasizing fast and helpful customer service.
Aruba Central, in contrast, has a 0/5 rating and no recent reviews, indicating a lack of user feedback and engagement. Given its primary function as a network management platform, its interface is likely more complex and less tailored for non-technical hotel staff. Edge: ReGuest.
ReGuest offers a suite of 38 features specifically designed for guest communication and CRM, including guest surveys, automated replies, chatbots, omnichannel inbox, digital check-in, and guest history. It also enables upselling, offers campaign management, and supports integrations with various booking and property management systems.
Aruba Central, by contrast, has no features listed beyond network management functions such as hardware control, real-time analytics, and AI-powered insights. It does not include communication or CRM features. For a hotel focused on guest engagement, ReGuest’s extensive feature set makes it the clear winner. Edge: ReGuest.
ReGuest’s customer support is highly praised, with a 4.97/5 rating and reviews citing exceptional, responsive service. Users appreciate the active support team, which helps implement and troubleshoot effectively, contributing to their high likelihood of recommendation.
Aruba Central has no recent reviews or support ratings available, making it impossible to assess support quality. Its lack of recent user feedback suggests limited customer engagement or dissatisfaction. For your team’s peace of mind, ReGuest’s proven support approach is preferable. Edge: ReGuest.
ReGuest offers 20 verified integrations, including prominent property management and booking systems such as Mews, Seekda, and Simple Booking. It also supports open API access, enabling custom integrations tailored to your hotel’s existing tech stack.
Aruba Central has no verified integrations listed, reflecting its primary role as a network management platform rather than a guest engagement tool. For hotels seeking seamless integration with guest systems and property management software, ReGuest provides more extensive connectivity. Edge: ReGuest.
ReGuest has a high review score of approximately 75.9 out of 100, based on 29 reviews, with recent feedback indicating strong satisfaction. Hoteliers in diverse segments, including boutique hotels and resorts, praise its user-friendliness, support, and impact on guest communication.
Aruba Central, with a 0/5 rating and no recent reviews, lacks user feedback to support its efficacy in hotel settings. Its utility appears limited outside network management. For guest communication, ReGuest’s high ratings clearly make it the favored option. Edge: ReGuest.
Pricing details for Aruba Central are not publicly available, likely due to its focus on network infrastructure for enterprise clients. It typically involves customized quotes based on hardware and scale.
ReGuest’s pricing is also not explicitly listed but is generally understood to be a premium product with no free tier. Given the comprehensive feature set and support, expect a cost aligned with hotel size and needs. Since both lack transparent pricing, consider this a factor for direct vendor inquiries.
Aruba Central is best suited for properties with a substantial IT footprint seeking infrastructure control, not for guest communication enhancements.
ReGuest is optimal for properties prioritizing guest experience, onboarding automation, and integrated communication workflows.
ReGuest and Aruba Central serve fundamentally different purposes. Aruba Central is a network management system designed for IT teams handling hardware and infrastructure, not tailored for guest communication or CRM. ReGuest, however, is a guest communication platform with a robust feature set that enhances guest satisfaction through automated, omnichannel messaging.
Choose Aruba Central if your hotel needs to manage complex network infrastructure across multiple locations. Its strengths lie in security, centralized control, and real-time analytics for IT teams.
Opt for ReGuest if your hotel aims to streamline guest communication, increase personalization, and drive loyalty. Its high review score, recent positive feedback, and extensive features make it the clear choice for guest engagement.
In conclusion, for a hotel focused on elevating guest experiences through communication, ReGuest is the superior solution. Aruba Central remains the trusted choice for network management but is not suited for your guest interaction objectives.
According to HTR's product database, Aruba Central and ReGuest Guest Communication share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | HPE/Aruba |
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Opt-In/Consent Collection | ||
| Automated Replies | ||
| Chatbot Booking Agent | ||
| Messaging Guest Surveys | ||
| Open API | ||
| Secured Data Protection |
Showing top differences. 26 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
ReGuest stands out for its efficient chat functions, allowing quick and intuitive guest communication which simplifies operations and enhances guest s... ReGuest stands out for its efficient chat functions, allowing quick and intuitive guest communication which simplifies operations and enhances guest satisfaction.
The platform is acknowledged for its user-friendly interface, with quick, intuitive handling and a motivating design that is appreciated by many users... The platform is acknowledged for its user-friendly interface, with quick, intuitive handling and a motivating design that is appreciated by many users.
ReGuest's modular system offers flexibility and personalization but increases costs, which is a concern for some users.
Where hoteliers push back
The system provides clear and fast statistics, although some users wish for more detailed analyses, particularly of specific messages.
While offering some customizable options, the platform has limited self-implementing features and intuitive setup for new templates.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Aruba Central and ReGuest Guest Communication share many core Guest Messaging Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Aruba Central offers 0 verified integration partners, while ReGuest Guest Communication offers 20. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ReGuest Guest Communication leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Aruba Central: No. ReGuest Guest Communication: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Guest Messaging Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. HPE/Aruba has an HT Score of 0 and Reguest has 74. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property