The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 119 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Asana shines in ROI .
Quore shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.4/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile App and Mobile access on any device.
Side-by-side ratings based on 119 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 2 | 117 |
After analyzing 119 verified reviews, Asana users most value its , while Quore users highlight communication efficiency, tracking and reporting, guest messaging and interaction. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Communication Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Tracking and Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Messaging and Interaction
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
Training and Onboarding
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile App Limitations
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Staff Collaboration Tools vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | #14 1 reviews | #9 3 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #25 1 reviews | #6 53 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 36 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #3 15 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 46 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #26 1 reviews | #4 40 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #26 1 reviews | #3 96 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #5 15 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #32 1 reviews | #4 100 reviews |
| Europe | #23 1 reviews | #15 2 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #11 0 reviews |
Choosing between Asana by Asana and Quore by Quore hinges on your hotel’s operational priorities and specific needs. Both tools aim to improve team collaboration, but they serve different scopes—Asana excels in general task management, while Quore specializes in hospitality-specific workflows. Your decision depends on whether your focus is broader project management or detailed operational tracking tailored for hotels.
While Asana is renowned for its simplicity and versatility, Quore offers a more comprehensive suite of tools directly aligned with hotel operations. Do you want a flexible, general collaboration app or a dedicated hospitality solution? Let’s explore how they compare across key areas.
Both Asana and Quore aim to facilitate team collaboration, but they approach this from different angles. Asana is a widely-used work management platform with a focus on task tracking and project visibility across various industries, including non-hospitality sectors.
Quore, on the other hand, is explicitly designed for hotels, with over 30 modules catering to housekeeping, guest services, maintenance, and more. Its features are built around hotel workflows, making it inherently more suitable for property-specific needs.
In terms of recent reviews, Quore’s larger volume and updated feedback (115 reviews, all within the past six months) give it more current insights. Asana's only two reviews are outdated, making its data less reliable.
Do you need a broad task management system or a hotel-centric operations platform? The answer will guide your choice.
If your hotel requires a simple, user-friendly collaboration tool for internal communication and project management, Asana could serve you well. It’s ideal for teams that want easy task assignment, deadlines, and straightforward progress tracking, especially if your staff is already familiar with project management software.
However, if your hotel needs a system that manages guest requests, maintenance, housekeeping, and operational workflows in one place, Quore is the better pick. It’s built specifically for hotels, with 24 unique functions such as work orders, preventive maintenance, inventory tracking, and asset logs, making it highly suited for hospitality operations.
For hotels with complex, multi-department workflows or a portfolio of properties, Quore's specialized tools will likely outperform Asana’s general approach. Hoteliers focused on operational efficiency should prioritize Quore.
Asana scored a 4/5 in ease of use, reflecting its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Its minimal functionalities (4-5 core features) mean staff can adapt quickly, especially those familiar with project management tools, though some setup and training are needed for consistency.
Quore boasts a slightly higher ease of use rating at 4.43/5, attributed to its dedicated hospitality design and user-friendly mobile app. Its onboarding score of 4.18/5 and numerous positive reviews highlight that staff find Quore easier to adopt in a hotel environment, despite its broader feature set.
Edge: Quore.
Asana offers no exclusive features tailored to hotels, focusing instead on general project management functionalities like task assignments, deadlines, and progress visualization. Its simplicity appeals to teams seeking minimal complexity.
Quore, however, boasts 24 specialized modules including work orders, preventive maintenance, asset logs, inventory analysis, and guest request tracking. These tools directly address hotel operations, making Quore more feature-rich for hospitality needs.
Given the breadth of hotel-specific features, Quore clearly has the edge here.
Edge: Quore.
Asana's support rating is 2.5/5, with reviews mentioning inconsistent or slow support and limited assistance, especially for hotel-specific issues. Its support is less tailored to hospitality, leading to frustration among hotel users.
Quore’s support scores a strong 4.36/5, with reviews praising the quick, helpful assistance and dedicated onboarding. Customers like the personalized support that understands hotel workflows, helping them troubleshoot and adapt more effectively.
Edge: Quore.
Asana has no verified partners or integrations, limiting its ability to connect with property management or hospitality systems. This can result in manual data entry and fragmented workflows.
Quore integrates with eight verified partners, including popular systems like Zingle, Revinate, and Beekeeper. These integrations streamline operations across guest messaging, reputation management, and communication platforms.
Therefore, Quore has a significant advantage in connectivity for hotel operations.
Edge: Quore.
Asana's reviews are scarce and outdated, with only two reviews and no recent feedback, making its current rating unreliable. Its 4.5/5 overall score is based on minimal data points outside the hotel industry.
Quore has 115 recent reviews averaging 4.27/5, with hoteliers praising its operational tools and user-friendliness. Branded hotels and independent properties rate it highly, often citing improved communication and workflow efficiency.
Considering recent, hotel-specific feedback, Quore’s ratings are more trustworthy and reflective of actual hotel experiences.
Edge: Quore.
Asana does not publicly list its pricing, as it offers a freemium model with limitations; enterprise pricing is quote-based. Its free plan is limited to small teams, which may be insufficient for larger hotels.
Quore costs $200 per month, with no free trial or tiered plans listed. While its price is straightforward, it represents a significant investment for smaller properties. The value depends on whether you utilize the full suite of hotel-specific features.
Pricing transparency favors Quore, but your hotel’s budget and feature needs will ultimately determine value.
Not ideal if your hotel requires detailed operational workflows, guest request management, or asset tracking.
Not ideal if your hotel operates with very basic needs or prefers a general project management solution.
The core difference is that Asana is a general-purpose project management platform, while Quore is tailored specifically for hotel operations. Asana works well for small teams or properties that need simple collaboration tools without hospitality-specific features.
If your hotel demands detailed, integrated workflows and operational tracking, Quore provides a suite of 24 modules designed for hospitality, making it the more suitable choice. Its recent reviews and hotel-centric tools give it a clear advantage.
Choose Asana if you need lightweight, flexible team collaboration. Opt for Quore if your goal is to streamline hotel operations, improve communication, and manage multiple processes in one platform.
In conclusion, for most hotels seeking operational clarity and efficiency, Quore’s extensive features, recent positive reviews, and industry focus make it the stronger option. Asana may serve smaller or less complex teams but falls short in hospitality-specific functionality and recent user feedback.
This analysis is based on current review data and feature sets. Hotel managers should evaluate their specific needs before making a final decision.
According to HTR's product database, Asana and Quore share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Asset Maintenance Logs | ||
| CapEX Budgeting & Forecasting | ||
| Lost & found module | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Recurring Tasks | ||
| Work Orders & Ticketing |
Showing top differences. 12 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers appreciate Quore's capability to facilitate seamless communication among departments, effectively passing on information and improving respo... Hoteliers appreciate Quore's capability to facilitate seamless communication among departments, effectively passing on information and improving response times to guest requests. This has significantly reduced misunderstandings and delays, enhancing overall team collaboration and guest satisfaction.
Users find Quore's tracking and reporting features useful for maintaining logs of various operations, including guest requests, maintenance, and inven... Users find Quore's tracking and reporting features useful for maintaining logs of various operations, including guest requests, maintenance, and inventory. These features help in keeping detailed records, which aids in improving accountability and efficiency in hotel operations.
Hoteliers appreciate the guest messaging feature in Quore, which helps in direct communication with guests and effectively managing their requests. Ho... Hoteliers appreciate the guest messaging feature in Quore, which helps in direct communication with guests and effectively managing their requests. However, some users suggest improvements like better integration with other guest service platforms.
Where hoteliers push back
Many users emphasize the need for greater customization options within Quore, such as modifying report fields, tailoring the dashboard, and integratin... Many users emphasize the need for greater customization options within Quore, such as modifying report fields, tailoring the dashboard, and integrating with other property management systems. The lack of customization sometimes limits the software's effectiveness for specific hotel needs.
Several reviews highlight issues with Quore's training and onboarding process. Users find the training insufficient and sometimes not intuitive enough... Several reviews highlight issues with Quore's training and onboarding process. Users find the training insufficient and sometimes not intuitive enough, leading to a steep learning curve for new employees. This hampers the initial adoption and effective use of the software.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Asana and Quore share many core Staff Collaboration Tools features, but each has unique capabilities. Asana offers 0 verified integration partners, while Quore offers 8. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Quore leads in ease of use at 4.4/5 vs 4.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Asana: No. Quore: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Staff Collaboration Tools vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Asana has an HT Score of 0 and Quore has 25. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor