The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 52 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) shines .
Simple Booking shines when it comes to user-friendly interface , with exclusive features like Urgency messaging and Automated reporting.
Side-by-side ratings based on 52 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 21 | 31 |
After analyzing 52 verified reviews, Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) users most value its , while Simple Booking users highlight user-friendly interface, customer support, increased booking conversions. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Increased Booking Conversions
▾
|
|
|
+
Flexibility and Customization
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Advanced Functionalities
▾
|
|
|
−
Cost-related Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #38 2 reviews | #31 6 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #37 3 reviews | #21 19 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #24 4 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #23 1 reviews | #27 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #45 1 reviews | #28 13 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #46 1 reviews | #26 12 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #39 2 reviews | #26 7 reviews |
| Extended Stay | #36 1 reviews | #27 3 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #17 4 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | — | #11 25 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #26 1 reviews | #22 2 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #12 4 reviews |
Choosing the right booking engine can significantly impact your hotel's operational efficiency, revenue, and guest satisfaction. Both ASI WebRes by Anand Systems Inc. and Simple Booking aim to streamline reservations, but they approach this goal differently. ASI WebRes is part of a larger hotel management ecosystem, offering deep integration with its PMS, while Simple Booking emphasizes flexibility, marketing tools, and ease of use. Considering your hotel’s needs, which product aligns best with your growth plans and operational complexity?
Both products serve as reservation engines, but their scope and maturity differ. ASI WebRes is integrated within the broader ASI Property Management System, designed for properties seeking comprehensive management and distribution. Simple Booking, however, is a standalone system focusing on direct bookings, channel management, and marketing automation. Recent reviews favor Simple Booking due to its higher review count and recent positive feedback, indicating a stronger market presence and ongoing support.
If your hotel needs a flexible, marketing-oriented reservation system with extensive integrations and user-friendly interfaces, go with Simple Booking. It’s especially suited for boutique hotels, city-center properties, and resorts aiming to maximize direct bookings and enhance marketing efforts. Conversely, if your hotel requires a comprehensive property management system that centralizes operations, reporting, and reservations within a single platform, ASI WebRes is a better fit. It caters to multi-property portfolios and independent hotels looking for operational efficiency.
ASI WebRes scores a 4.95/5 for ease of use, praised for its intuitive interface and seamless onboarding, with reviews highlighting quick setup and straightforward daily operations. Simple Booking also rates highly at 4.79/5, with users emphasizing its user-friendly booking flow and effective channel management. Recent reviews underscore that both systems are easy for staff to adopt, but ASI’s extensive features might require slightly longer onboarding.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
Simple Booking offers 17 exclusive features, including urgency messaging, automated reporting, booking abandonment recapture, and multiple payment integrations such as Apple Pay, Google Pay, and PayPal. It also features advanced marketing tools like loyalty program integration and rate match capabilities. ASI WebRes, however, provides a robust suite of core PMS functionalities, reservation management, housekeeping, billing, and detailed reporting but lacks many of the marketing and payment features found in Simple Booking.
Edge: Simple Booking.
Both products boast high customer support ratings, with ASI WebRes at 4.85/5 and Simple Booking at 4.76/5. Users praise ASI’s prompt technical support and clear communication, with reviews stating, "Technical issues are resolved immediately and staff are courteous." Simple Booking’s support is also responsive, but recent feedback suggests it has become slightly less accessible, though still reliable. Given the more recent reviews and higher overall score, ASI’s support edges ahead.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
Simple Booking integrates with over 56 verified partners, more than three times the 19 in ASI’s network. Common integrations include SiteMinder, Cendyn, and Triptease, but Simple Booking supports additional payment gateways, marketing tools, and property management systems. This extensive integration ecosystem provides more flexibility for your hotel to connect with various distribution and marketing channels.
Edge: Simple Booking.
While ASI WebRes’s reviews are more limited and older, the recent data shows a stronger preference for Simple Booking, especially among boutique, city-center, and resort hotels. Hotels that value innovative marketing tools and channel management tend to rate Simple Booking higher, with some reviewers noting significant booking uplift. ASI’s higher customer support score and broader PMS integration are acknowledged, but overall, Simple Booking’s recent review volume and scores favor it.
Edge: Simple Booking.
ASI WebRes does not publicly list pricing, suggesting a tailored quote based on hotel needs, typical for enterprise-level systems. Simple Booking charges a flat rate of $200 per month, with no mention of setup fees or additional charges. This transparent pricing makes comparison straightforward, but additional features or integrations may incur extra costs in Simple Booking.
Not ideal if your hotel primarily seeks a standalone booking engine focused on direct reservations and marketing.
Not ideal if you require a comprehensive property management platform or have complex operational needs.
The core difference is that ASI WebRes is part of a larger PMS ecosystem, designed for operational management and multi-property oversight. Simple Booking is a dedicated reservation and marketing platform optimized for direct bookings and channel visibility, with a broader set of integrations.
If your hotel needs an all-in-one management system that handles reservations, front desk, housekeeping, and reporting, ASI WebRes is the clear choice—especially for larger or multi-property portfolios. For hotels prioritizing direct booking growth, marketing automation, and flexible integrations, Simple Booking offers more features and recent positive reviews.
In conclusion, go with ASI WebRes if operational efficiency and management are your priority. Opt for Simple Booking if increasing direct bookings, marketing, and channel flexibility are more critical to your growth strategy. Both are capable solutions—your hotel’s specific needs should guide your choice.
Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, ASI WebRes and Simple Booking (Reservations System) share 27 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| A/B testing & optimization | ||
| Alternative accommodation recommendations (when no availability) | ||
| Automated reporting | ||
| Booking abandonment recapture | ||
| Price comparison widget | ||
| Urgency messaging |
Showing top differences. 5 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
Ranks higher for
What hoteliers love
The software's intuitive and easy-to-use interface is frequently praised, allowing both hotel staff and guests to navigate and manage bookings effortl... The software's intuitive and easy-to-use interface is frequently praised, allowing both hotel staff and guests to navigate and manage bookings effortlessly. This ease of use promotes higher conversion rates and a better overall user experience.
While customer support is generally praised for being responsive and helpful, some users note a decline in its quality, finding it cumbersome and diff... While customer support is generally praised for being responsive and helpful, some users note a decline in its quality, finding it cumbersome and difficult to reach lately. Continuous improvement in this area is crucial for maintaining user satisfaction.
Many hoteliers report a noticeable increase in their booking conversions since implementing SimpleBooking. Features such as the rate match tool, optim... Many hoteliers report a noticeable increase in their booking conversions since implementing SimpleBooking. Features such as the rate match tool, optimized user experience, and persuasive booking options contribute significantly to this improvement.
Where hoteliers push back
Hoteliers are impressed by the system's advanced functionalities, such as automated rate and availability management, customizable templates, and mult... Hoteliers are impressed by the system's advanced functionalities, such as automated rate and availability management, customizable templates, and multi-language support. These features enhance the booking process, making it more efficient and user-centric.
Several reviews highlight cost-related concerns, particularly the high prices for specific features like custom URLs and payment provider options. Use... Several reviews highlight cost-related concerns, particularly the high prices for specific features like custom URLs and payment provider options. Users feel that these charges are not justified and suggest more reasonable pricing.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
It depends on your requirements. ASI WebRes and Simple Booking (Reservations System) share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. ASI WebRes offers 19 verified integration partners, while Simple Booking (Reservations System) offers 56. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ASI WebRes leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.8/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ASI WebRes: No. Simple Booking (Reservations System): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) has an HT Score of 0 and Simple Booking has 68. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor