The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 108 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Septeo Hospitality shines , with exclusive features like Centralized Messaging and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
Planet shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like On premise and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 108 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 108 |
After analyzing 108 verified reviews, Septeo Hospitality users most value its , while Planet users highlight functionality and features, ease of use, multi-property management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Functionality and Features
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Multi-property Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
System Performance and Reliability
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #27 32 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 50 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 10 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #17 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #21 42 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #21 34 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #17 33 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #20 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #29 6 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #10 79 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #15 2 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can make or break your hotel's operations and guest experiences. ASTERIO by Septeo Hospitality and protel PMS by Planet both aim to streamline hotel management, but they serve different needs and hotel profiles. While ASTERIO offers an all-in-one platform for diverse services, protel PMS emphasizes extensive integrations and scalability. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s strategic goals?
ASTERIO promises to be much more than a traditional PMS, claiming to help manage not only rooms but also food, spa, wellness, and activity services. However, it suffers from a complete lack of recent reviews, with zero user ratings or current feedback, making its performance and reliability uncertain. In contrast, protel PMS has over 105 recent reviews, with the latest in the past six months, and an 80% likelihood to recommend, indicating a more validated user experience.
While ASTERIO aims to improve productivity, develop revenues, and enhance customer journeys, its absent review data leaves hotel managers questioning its real-world performance. Conversely, protel PMS is widely praised for its functionality, ease of use, and extensive integration ecosystem, but some reviews mention sluggish support responsiveness and bugs. Do you prefer a solution with proven recent user feedback or an untested platform with no current reviews?
Your choice hinges on your hotel’s needs. If you require a flexible, scalable PMS with a vast ecosystem of integrations, go with protel PMS. It suits hotels that prioritize automation, efficiency, and a wide array of third-party connectivity, especially in larger or multi-property environments. If, however, your hotel seeks a broad-service management platform that encompasses wellness, retail, and activity operations under a unified system, ASTERIO might appear appealing, though with the caveat of lacking recent validation.
For properties that value proven reliability, extensive integrations, and active user support, protel PMS is clearly the stronger candidate. ASTERIO’s appeal diminishes without user reviews confirming its effectiveness and support quality. Would you rather rely on a platform with verified recent feedback or one with no current user data?
protel PMS scores a 4.12/5 for ease of use, backed by over 100 recent reviews describing its intuitive interface, fast onboarding, and straightforward daily operations. Users praise its user-friendly navigation and comprehensive training resources, though some mention occasional bugs and slow support response times.
In comparison, ASTERIO has a 0/5 rating, with no recent reviews or user feedback available, raising questions about its usability and staff adoption. Without concrete data, it’s impossible to gauge if ASTERIO’s interface is as accessible as protel’s. Edge: protel PMS.
protel PMS offers 33 shared features with ASTERIO, plus 13 unique to protel and 11 unique to ASTERIO. Notable features exclusive to ASTERIO include a Spa & Wellness Module, channel management, EPoS, and online check-in/out, positioning it as a comprehensive platform for diversified hotel services.
protel PMS, on the other hand, excels in core PMS functionalities, with features like a booking engine, extensive integrations (over 1,200 partners), and automation tools. Its focus on property management efficiency is well-reviewed and trusted. Given the limited feature details and recent reviews for ASTERIO, protel’s feature set and proven performance give it the edge.
Edge: protel PMS.
protel PMS’s support scores 3.95/5, with recent reviews citing generally helpful service, though some mention delays and responsiveness issues. Customers appreciate proactive support for integrations and onboarding, but frustrations remain over response times and unresolved bugs.
ASTERIO has no recent reviews or support ratings available, making it impossible to assess its customer service quality. With proven support from protel PMS users and recent feedback, protel’s support quality is the safer choice. Edge: protel PMS.
protel PMS boasts over 1,200 integrations, including key partners like SiteMinder, Experience Hotel, and RevControl. It supports a broad ecosystem, enabling hotels to connect with revenue management, CRM, channel management, and other third-party systems effectively.
ASTERIO’s integration count is limited to 13 verified partners, with no mention of extensive connectivity. Given the importance of integrations for operational efficiency in larger or multi-system hotels, protel’s ecosystem offers superior flexibility. Edge: protel PMS.
With over 105 recent reviews, protel PMS has an 80% likelihood of recommendation and a 4.11/5 overall rating, with specific praise for its functionality and ease of use across various hotel types. It receives particularly high marks from independent and branded hotels, with ratings averaging above 4/5.
Meanwhile, ASTERIO has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction. Based on validated recent data, protel PMS clearly outperforms. Edge: protel PMS.
ASTERO’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it might be a custom or less transparent model. Conversely, protel PMS costs $500 per month as a base fee, with no additional implementation or setup fees, but possibly extra charges for add-ons and integrations.
Given the transparency and clarity around protel’s pricing, your hotel can better assess value and budget planning. ASTERIO’s unknown cost structure makes comparisons difficult, but the lack of recent reviews raises questions about its value proposition.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on proven, reliable PMS features, extensive integrations, or requires quick staff onboarding, given the lack of recent data.
Not recommended for smaller hotels with very simple needs or those seeking an all-in-one service management platform outside of core property management.
protel PMS stands out as the more validated and versatile solution, with a strong track record of recent user feedback, extensive integrations, and a focus on core hotel management. Its broad ecosystem supports hotels of all sizes, especially those with complex operational needs.
If your hotel needs a reliable, well-supported PMS with proven features and integrations, go with protel PMS. It excels in scalability, automation, and support, making it suitable for a wide range of hotel types and sizes.
ASTERIO, while promising a unified platform for diverse services, remains unproven in recent user experiences, limiting confidence in its current capabilities. It may be considered if your hotel is a large multi-service operation willing to take a chance on a less validated platform.
In conclusion, for most hotels evaluating a property management system today, protel PMS offers a safer, more proven choice with clearer value and support. ASTERIO may have potential but requires further validation before it becomes a reliable solution for your team.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
According to HTR's product database, ASTERIO (by Septeo Hospitality) and protel PMS (by Planet) share 33 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated night audit | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Spa & Wellness Module | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in |
Showing top differences. 12 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management.... Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management. However, many reviews expressed disappointment that a lot of these functionalities are incomplete, buggy, or missing entirely when dealing with more complex setups or multi-property environments. Custom reports and seamless integration with other tools are also highlighted as beneficial.
The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the... The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the efficiency in managing daily operations. However, certain updates have made certain functions more complex and less intuitive than before.
Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfa... Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfaces, many found the system frustratingly limited for multi-location setups, highlighting significant bugs and reduced functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor resp... Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor response times after the acquisition by Planet. Users recommend improving the speed and reliability of customer service.
Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. H... Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. However, this flexibility often comes at a high cost, and some required features are only available through paid custom development.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ASTERIO (by Septeo Hospitality) and protel PMS (by Planet) share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. ASTERIO (by Septeo Hospitality) offers 13 verified integration partners, while protel PMS (by Planet) offers 194. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. protel PMS (by Planet) leads in ease of use at 4.1/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ASTERIO (by Septeo Hospitality): No. protel PMS (by Planet): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Septeo Hospitality has an HT Score of 0 and Planet has 33. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor