The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 108 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
AsyaSoft shines .
Planet shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like On premise and Revenue management module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 108 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 108 |
After analyzing 108 verified reviews, AsyaSoft users most value its , while Planet users highlight functionality and features, ease of use, multi-property management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Functionality and Features
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Multi-property Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
System Performance and Reliability
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #27 32 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 50 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 10 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #17 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #21 42 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #21 34 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #17 33 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #20 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #29 6 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #10 79 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #15 2 reviews |
Choosing between AsyaSoft PMS and protel PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, budget, and operational complexity. Both platforms aim to streamline property management, but they differ significantly in functionality, support, and market presence. AsyaSoft, with zero reviews and no recent data, isn't a viable contender right now, while protel boasts over 105 reviews in the last six months, making it the more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking recent feedback and ongoing support.
Given the data, which platform will serve your hotel’s growth and efficiency more effectively?
AsyaSoft PMS by AsyaSoft shows no recent reviews or ratings, which makes assessing its current performance impossible. In contrast, protel PMS has a robust presence with over 105 reviews in the last six months, a strong 4.11 out of 5 overall rating, and an NPS score of 7.7/5, indicating high customer satisfaction.
While AsyaSoft claims to offer property management solutions, the lack of recent feedback and reviews suggests it struggles with market relevance or customer engagement. Conversely, protel’s recent reviews highlight its reliability, extensive features, and active support, making it the more trustworthy platform to consider.
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, well-supported PMS with extensive integrations, go with protel. It’s better suited for hotels seeking reliable support, scalable cloud solutions, and a broad ecosystem of integrations, especially given its high review count and recent feedback.
If your hotel is small, has minimal operational complexity, or requires a basic system without extensive integrations, AsyaSoft’s limited data might suggest a lower-cost, straightforward solution—though its lack of recent reviews raises concerns about ongoing support and development.
In summary, for most hotels looking for a dependable, modern PMS, protel is the clear choice.
Protel scores a near-perfect 4.12 out of 5 for ease of use, with many recent reviews praising its intuitive interface and quick onboarding process—"the system is user-friendly, and new staff can learn it fast," according to some users. It also benefits from consistent updates, although some mention occasional bugs.
AsyaSoft, with no recent reviews or ratings, offers no current data on usability, but the absence of feedback suggests it may lack the polish, support, or ongoing development that users expect from modern PMS solutions.
Edge: protel.
Protel offers over 46 features, including revenue management, multi-currency support, booking engine, guest CRM, integrated payments, shift planning, and drag-and-drop tapechart—covering all core hotel operations. Its extensive ecosystem of over 1,200 integrations enhances its adaptability, making it suitable for complex property setups.
AsyaSoft, with zero features listed and no recent updates, appears to lack the depth and breadth of functionality necessary for more demanding hotel environments. Its limited data makes it impossible to compare, but the absence of features suggests it’s less capable.
Edge: protel.
Protel’s support scores a solid 3.95 out of 5, with recent reviews indicating generally helpful responses. Users appreciate the 24/7 multilingual support, though some mention occasional delays, especially during busy periods.
AsyaSoft has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to judge current support quality. Given the importance of reliable support in hotel operations, the lack of recent feedback on AsyaSoft raises concerns about its responsiveness and customer service.
Edge: protel.
Protel’s ecosystem boasts over 195 verified integrations, including popular systems like Innspire, Right Revenue, and RevControl. This extensive integration network allows hotels to connect with various revenue management, channel management, and marketing tools easily.
AsyaSoft lists no verified integrations or partners, suggesting limited connectivity options. Without a broad integration ecosystem, AsyaSoft may hinder your hotel’s ability to scale and automate processes efficiently.
Edge: protel.
Protel’s recent reviews consistently rate it above 4 out of 5, with an 80% likelihood to recommend, reflecting strong satisfaction across various hotel segments, including independent and branded hotels. Hotels like Hôtel Paris Bastille and Hotel Nordic highlight improved efficiency, faster check-ins, and increased revenue.
AsyaSoft’s lack of recent reviews and ratings means we can't gauge current user satisfaction. The recent positive feedback for protel underscores its reputation among hoteliers.
Edge: protel.
AsyaSoft’s pricing is not publicly listed, which could imply a custom quote or a less transparent pricing model. In contrast, protel charges a base price of $500 with no additional implementation fees, offering clear and predictable costs.
The transparency in protel’s pricing makes budgeting easier and reduces surprises, whereas AsyaSoft’s opaque pricing model might pose challenges for decision-makers.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Protel is a comprehensive, well-supported PMS with a broad ecosystem, making it suitable for hotels that need scalability, integrations, and ongoing technological support. Its recent reviews reflect high satisfaction, reliability, and a proven track record in diverse hotel segments.
AsyaSoft, lacking recent data and features, appears less capable of meeting the needs of modern hotels, especially those seeking growth or operational efficiency. Its unknown support and integration capabilities make it a risky choice for most properties.
In conclusion, unless your hotel’s needs are minimal and budget constraints are tight, protel is the more dependable and scalable solution. It offers the features, support, and ecosystem that align with the expectations of today’s competitive hospitality market.
According to HTR's product database, AsyaSoft PMS and protel PMS (by Planet) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 34 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
What hoteliers love
Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management.... Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management. However, many reviews expressed disappointment that a lot of these functionalities are incomplete, buggy, or missing entirely when dealing with more complex setups or multi-property environments. Custom reports and seamless integration with other tools are also highlighted as beneficial.
The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the... The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the efficiency in managing daily operations. However, certain updates have made certain functions more complex and less intuitive than before.
Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfa... Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfaces, many found the system frustratingly limited for multi-location setups, highlighting significant bugs and reduced functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor resp... Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor response times after the acquisition by Planet. Users recommend improving the speed and reliability of customer service.
Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. H... Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. However, this flexibility often comes at a high cost, and some required features are only available through paid custom development.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. AsyaSoft PMS and protel PMS (by Planet) share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. AsyaSoft PMS offers 0 verified integration partners, while protel PMS (by Planet) offers 194. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. protel PMS (by Planet) leads in ease of use at 4.1/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
AsyaSoft PMS: No. protel PMS (by Planet): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. AsyaSoft has an HT Score of 0 and Planet has 33. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor