The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 123 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Athena shines .
SkyTouch Technology shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.0/5) , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 123 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 123 |
After analyzing 123 verified reviews, Athena users most value its , while SkyTouch Technology users highlight user-friendly interface, customer support responsiveness, remote access. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Athena |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-friendly interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support responsiveness
▾
|
|
|
+
Remote access
▾
|
|
|
+
Tape chart
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customizability limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
Bugs and glitches
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #19 41 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #10 72 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #21 5 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #23 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #18 47 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #22 27 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #10 45 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #22 7 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #7 120 reviews |
| Europe | — | #60 0 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #38 1 reviews |
Choosing between Athena by Athena and SkyTouch Technology for your hotel’s property management system can feel overwhelming. Both aim to streamline operations, but they differ significantly in maturity, features, and user reception. Athena appears to target more specialized, AI-driven revenue management, while SkyTouch emphasizes ease of use, integration, and comprehensive property management capabilities. Your decision should hinge on your hotel's specific needs and operational scale.
Based on available data and recent reviews, SkyTouch Technology has more recent feedback, higher ratings, and a broader range of features. This suggests a more active and supportive platform, making it the more reliable choice for most hoteliers right now. Do you want a system that’s proven and well-supported, or one still emerging in the market?
Both Athena and SkyTouch address core property management challenges like reservations, guest tracking, and billing. Athena’s AI-powered revenue insights aim to optimize profitability but lack recent user reviews, leaving uncertainty about ongoing support and functionality. SkyTouch, by contrast, has a 76.67 rating with 119 reviews, all within the past six months, indicating active user engagement and continuous improvements.
While Athena offers no recent reviews, its AI tools might appeal if your hotel prioritizes automation and data-driven pricing. However, if your hotel values a mature, well-rounded PMS with a large user base, SkyTouch’s recent reviews and higher overall score make it the safer choice. Are you willing to risk adopting a less proven product for potential future benefits?
If your hotel needs a user-friendly, highly-rated PMS with extensive functionality and ongoing support, go with SkyTouch. Its 119 recent reviews with an 8.61 NPS score and 4.5-star customer support demonstrate a platform that’s actively trusted by hoteliers.
If, on the other hand, your team is seeking a system with advanced AI revenue management and automation capabilities, Athena’s specialization may be attractive—though the lack of recent reviews and support data makes this less certain. For most hotels looking for reliability and support, SkyTouch is the clear choice.
SkyTouch’s ease-of-use rating is 4.64/5, backed by recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and simple reservation management. Users report that new staff members can learn the system in less than a day, and the platform's visual tape chart simplifies reservation adjustments.
Athena has no current usability ratings or recent reviews, leaving its user experience unverified. Given the consistent praise for SkyTouch’s straightforward design, edge: SkyTouch.
SkyTouch offers 27 exclusive features, including a booking engine, revenue management, channel integration, guest CRM, and automated night audits—features Athena currently does not provide. Athena’s feature set appears limited to basic management functions, with no detailed list of unique capabilities.
If your hotel requires comprehensive features like integrated revenue management or channel management, SkyTouch provides a clear edge. The breadth and depth of SkyTouch’s functionalities make it the more complete platform for operational needs. Edge: SkyTouch.
SkyTouch’s customer support scores 4.5/5, with recent reviews highlighting professionalism and helpfulness. Users mention that support is responsive and knowledgeable, although some note long wait times for resolving ongoing issues.
Athena’s support data is unavailable, but its lack of recent reviews raises concerns about ongoing customer assistance and platform development. Given current ratings and feedback, edge: SkyTouch.
SkyTouch integrates with 33 verified partners, including Channel Managers, CRS, and guest experience tools, offering a flexible ecosystem. Athena, with zero verified partnerships, appears isolated, limiting connectivity with other systems.
For hotels relying on a network of third-party tools, SkyTouch’s extensive integrations provide a significant advantage. Its open ecosystem supports scalable, connected operations. Edge: SkyTouch.
SkyTouch’s recent reviews consistently rate the platform around 4/5, with users praising its ease of use, support, and functionality, especially in boutique and independent hotels. Athena’s ratings are 0/5, but this is due to a lack of recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge current hotel sentiment.
Given the active user feedback and higher ratings, SkyTouch is clearly favored by hoteliers. Its ongoing support and feature set resonate more with property needs. Edge: SkyTouch.
Athena does not disclose pricing, and its free trial or demo details are unavailable. SkyTouch charges a base fee of $600 per month, with no free trial or implementation fees listed, indicating a straightforward, predictable cost structure.
If budget transparency is vital, SkyTouch’s clear pricing allows easier planning. Athena’s opaque pricing may pose risks of hidden costs or unexpected charges. Edge: SkyTouch.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
SkyTouch offers a comprehensive, actively supported platform with recent hotel reviews, a broad feature set, and extensive integrations. Its ease of use and support make it suitable for most hotels looking for a reliable property management solution.
Athena, with its AI-driven focus, appeals to hotels seeking automation and advanced revenue strategies, but the lack of recent feedback raises concerns about ongoing support and stability. If your priority is proven performance and dependable support, SkyTouch is the clear choice.
For most hoteliers, SkyTouch’s current market presence and positive user sentiment make it the safer, more scalable option. Consider your hotel’s size, complexity, and tech readiness—SkyTouch comfortably fits a wide range of needs, while Athena remains a more specialized, emerging product.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Athena |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Athena and SkyTouch Technology share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 15 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We are finding great value and payback versus anything else out there on the market, and I have seen them all."
What hoteliers love
Users consistently praise SkyTouch for its intuitive, easy-to-navigate system. Many highlight how quickly new staff members can be trained, thanks to... Users consistently praise SkyTouch for its intuitive, easy-to-navigate system. Many highlight how quickly new staff members can be trained, thanks to the interface's simplicity. This aspect makes SkyTouch particularly well-suited for properties that frequently onboard new employees.
SkyTouch's customer support receives mixed feedback. Many users commend the support team for their professionalism and helpfulness. However, others cr... SkyTouch's customer support receives mixed feedback. Many users commend the support team for their professionalism and helpfulness. However, others criticize the extended waiting times and the fact that long-standing issues remain unresolved despite multiple reports.
SkyTouch's cloud-based system is appreciated for its remote access capability. This allows hotel managers to monitor operations, make rate changes, an... SkyTouch's cloud-based system is appreciated for its remote access capability. This allows hotel managers to monitor operations, make rate changes, and check reports from any location with internet access, which is a significant advantage for multi-property managers.
Where hoteliers push back
While SkyTouch offers a range of features, users report that the system's customizability is limited. Specific areas of concern include the inability... While SkyTouch offers a range of features, users report that the system's customizability is limited. Specific areas of concern include the inability to tailor reports, user interface layouts, and reservation processes to meet unique property needs.
Many users express frustration with SkyTouch due to recurring software bugs and glitches. These issues range from intermittent system crashes and logi... Many users express frustration with SkyTouch due to recurring software bugs and glitches. These issues range from intermittent system crashes and login problems to malfunctioning features like the tape chart and housekeeping modules. Users cite the need for more robust bug fixes and quicker resolutions from the support team.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Athena and SkyTouch Technology share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Athena offers 0 verified integration partners, while SkyTouch Technology offers 33. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. SkyTouch Technology leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Athena: No. SkyTouch Technology: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Athena has an HT Score of 0 and SkyTouch Technology has 77. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor