The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 1,245 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
AutoClerk, Inc. shines .
Cloudbeds shines in ROI — especially for independent properties (4.6/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 1,245 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 3 | 1,242 |
After analyzing 1,245 verified reviews, AutoClerk, Inc. users most value its , while Cloudbeds users highlight user-friendly interface, implementation and support, all-in-one ecosystem. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation and Support
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-One Ecosystem
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
|
−
Report Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 592 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #60 1 reviews | #4 212 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #54 0 reviews | #5 42 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #13 4 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #72 1 reviews | #2 473 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #67 0 reviews | #4 228 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #64 0 reviews | #6 116 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #2 93 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #57 1 reviews | #2 435 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #7 163 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #3 226 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #7 11 reviews |
Choosing between AutoClerk (PMS) and Cloudbeds PMS hinges on your hotel's specific needs, scale, and operational complexity. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but they differ sharply in scope, user experience, and market presence. AutoClerk primarily serves small to mid-sized independent hotels with a focus on simplicity, while Cloudbeds offers a broad, integrated ecosystem trusted by thousands of diverse hospitality providers worldwide. So, which product aligns better with your hotel’s growth trajectory?
AutoClerk has been around since 1985, with a small user base and fewer recent reviews, indicating limited recent market momentum. Conversely, Cloudbeds garners over 1,000 recent reviews, highlighting its strong growth and extensive user confidence. Are you prioritizing a mature, familiar system or a rapidly evolving, feature-rich platform?
AutoClerk’s strengths lie in its straightforward design and ease of learning, making it suitable for small independent hotels that want core PMS functions without complexity. Cloudbeds, on the other hand, excels at integrating multiple operational tools—reservations, channel management, booking engine—within one interface, which enhances efficiency for mid-sized or expanding properties.
While AutoClerk’s customer support is highly rated, its limited feature set and lack of recent reviews suggest it’s less adaptable to evolving hotel demands. Cloudbeds consistently receives high praise for its intuitive interface, extensive integrations, and rapid support, with recent reviews emphasizing its reliability. Do you need a simple system or a scalable platform with advanced integrations?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-operate PMS with strong support and minimal features, AutoClerk is a good fit. It’s ideal for small properties seeking to manage reservations and guest profiles without the burden of complex modules.
If your hotel requires a comprehensive, all-in-one platform with over 64 features—including channel management, revenue tools, and a flexible booking engine—Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its versatility and recent positive reviews from a broad spectrum of hospitality operators make it the better option for growth-minded hotels.
For hotels planning to expand or diversify operations, Cloudbeds’ scalability and extensive partner ecosystem outweigh AutoClerk’s simplicity. Which approach aligns better with your growth plans?
AutoClerk’s UI scores a high 4.33/5, with users praising its user-friendly, simple design. Implementation is straightforward for small hotels, with a support experience rated highly, but its limited features mean fewer complexities overall.
Cloudbeds offers an even higher rating of 4.61/5, with recent reviews emphasizing its intuitive, mobile-friendly interface and comprehensive onboarding. Its support team’s responsiveness is consistently praised, helping staff adopt new features quickly.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
AutoClerk’s feature set is minimal—mainly reservation management, guest profiles, and basic reporting—lacking advanced modules. In contrast, Cloudbeds boasts 64 features, including channel management, revenue optimization, guest communication, and integrated payment processing, all designed for scalable hospitality operations.
Cloudbeds’ features like automated night audits, multi-lingual support, and extensive integrations give it a clear advantage. If you need more than reservation management, Cloudbeds’ broader capabilities are indispensable.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
AutoClerk’s reviews highlight 24/7 support with rapid issue resolution, praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. However, with only 3 total reviews, the data is limited, and recent support experiences are not available.
Cloudbeds’ support scores slightly higher at 4.41/5, with recent reviews confirming quick, empathetic responses that help resolve issues efficiently. Its extensive onboarding resources and active user community provide added value.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
AutoClerk integrates with 8 verified partners, including some niche solutions like SHR Group and Intelity, but its ecosystem remains limited. Cloudbeds offers a vast marketplace with 190 verified partners, including major systems like SiteMinder, Duetto, and PayPal, providing extensive flexibility.
The breadth of Cloudbeds’ integrations allows your hotel to connect with a wider array of tools, from CRMs to revenue management, making it more adaptable to complex or growing operations.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
AutoClerk has a limited review pool with an overall rating of 3.5/5, mostly from small independent properties. Cloudbeds, by contrast, has a high overall rating of 4.63/5 based on over 1,000 recent reviews, from a diverse array of property types including boutique hotels, hostels, and resorts.
Recent reviews consistently praise Cloudbeds’ ease of use, support, and feature set, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. AutoClerk’s fewer reviews and dated feedback make it harder to evaluate current user satisfaction.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
AutoClerk does not publicly disclose its pricing, which often indicates a custom quote based on property size and needs. Cloudbeds’ base price is $600/month, with no setup fees or additional charges, making it transparent and predictable.
Given Cloudbeds’ extensive features, its pricing reflects a scalable solution suitable for properties looking to grow and integrate multiple tools. AutoClerk’s cost structure remains less clear, but its narrower scope suggests a lower price point—if it fits your core needs.
Not ideal if your hotel plans to expand, deploy sophisticated revenue tools, or integrate multiple systems.
Not ideal if your property needs only basic reservation management or has limited budget constraints.
Cloudbeds offers a broad, integrated platform that scales with your hotel’s growth, making it suitable for diverse property types worldwide. Its extensive features, recent positive reviews, and global presence make it the preferred choice for hotels aiming to modernize and expand.
AutoClerk provides a simple, reliable PMS for small properties that want core functionality without complexity. However, its limited recent reviews and feature set make it less suitable for hotels expecting growth or needing advanced tools.
For most hotels poised to grow, Cloudbeds delivers more value. If your operation is small and straightforward, AutoClerk may suffice, but consider future needs carefully. Which system aligns with your long-term vision?
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Autoclerk (PMS) and Cloudbeds PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 2-way real time integrations | ||
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| PMS connectivity |
Showing top differences. 52 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
What hoteliers love
Cloudbeds is praised for its intuitive and well-organized interface, making it accessible for all staff and reducing the need for extensive training.... Cloudbeds is praised for its intuitive and well-organized interface, making it accessible for all staff and reducing the need for extensive training. This ease of use is particularly beneficial for daily operations such as managing reservations and performing check-in/check-out processes.
Cloudbeds' implementation process and subsequent support receive mixed reviews. While its customer service is typically rated highly for responsivenes... Cloudbeds' implementation process and subsequent support receive mixed reviews. While its customer service is typically rated highly for responsiveness and assistance, complete feature parity on mobile and integration capabilities require more comprehensive support for a smoother transition.
Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive solution by integrating PMS, channel management, and booking engine in one platform. This reduces the need for multip... Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive solution by integrating PMS, channel management, and booking engine in one platform. This reduces the need for multiple systems, minimizing manual work and synchronizing operations in real time.
Where hoteliers push back
Reservation workflows within Cloudbeds are simple and efficient, notably for check-in and check-out processes. This feature greatly reduces administra... Reservation workflows within Cloudbeds are simple and efficient, notably for check-in and check-out processes. This feature greatly reduces administrative load, errors, and improves overall operational productivity. The system's drag-and-drop functionality is highlighted as particularly useful.
While Cloudbeds offers robust reporting features, users note a need for more flexibility in customization, as tailored management insights would be va... While Cloudbeds offers robust reporting features, users note a need for more flexibility in customization, as tailored management insights would be valuable for strategic decisions. This is a recurring theme among those seeking deeper analytics and visualization.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Autoclerk (PMS) and Cloudbeds PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Autoclerk (PMS) offers 8 verified integration partners, while Cloudbeds PMS offers 189. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Cloudbeds PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 4.3/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Autoclerk (PMS): No. Cloudbeds PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. AutoClerk, Inc. has an HT Score of 0 and Cloudbeds has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor