The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 50 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
AutoClerk, Inc. shines in ease of use and ROI .
Infor shines when it comes to ease of use , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 50 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 3 | 47 |
After analyzing 50 verified reviews, AutoClerk, Inc. users most value its , while Infor users highlight ease of use, reporting, integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #44 8 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #60 1 reviews | #25 24 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #54 0 reviews | #19 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #24 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #72 1 reviews | #28 24 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #67 0 reviews | #23 26 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #64 0 reviews | #29 8 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #31 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #57 1 reviews | #22 20 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #24 17 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #28 1 reviews |
Choosing between AutoClerk (PMS) by AutoClerk, Inc. and Infor HMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, as both systems aim to streamline operations but differ significantly in scale, features, and user feedback. AutoClerk primarily serves independent hotels and smaller properties, offering essential management tools, while Infor caters to larger, more complex hotels with extensive customization and integration options. Your decision should consider your property size, operational complexity, and growth plans.
AutoClerk is straightforward with a focus on core PMS features, whereas Infor provides a broad suite of modules, including revenue management and guest profiles. Both promise to improve efficiency but target different hotel segments. Are you prioritizing a simple, easy-to-implement system, or do you need a more comprehensive, flexible platform?
AutoClerk’s strength lies in its simplicity and ease of use, making it suitable for small to mid-sized properties that need reliable, straightforward operations. Its cloud-based system is highly rated for onboarding and support, with a 4.33/5 ease of use score and a 4/5 value rating, emphasizing quick deployment and affordability.
In contrast, Infor boasts a more extensive feature set, including housekeeping, guest profiles, revenue management, and multi-lingual support, all integrated within a scalable cloud platform. Its 4.04/5 overall rating reflects its popularity among more complex hotels and chains looking for customization and automation.
The key divergence is in their review volume and recency. AutoClerk has only 3 reviews, none in the last 6 months, making its data less current and less reliable. Infor’s 46 reviews, all recent, provide a clearer picture of ongoing performance. Given this, Infor’s higher review count and recent feedback suggest a more dependable choice for larger, growing hotels.
If your hotel is small, independent, or has straightforward operational needs, go with AutoClerk. Its intuitive interface and premium support make onboarding easier, and its lower complexity reduces training time.
If your hotel is part of a chain, upscale, or requires extensive customization—such as guest profiles, revenue management, or multi-currency support—Infor is the better fit. Its suite of 20 exclusive features and widespread integrations will facilitate complex operations and growth.
For properties seeking a budget-friendly, easy-to-learn system with reliable support, AutoClerk shines. Conversely, if your hotel needs advanced modules and scalability, Infor’s extensive capabilities make it the optimal choice.
AutoClerk scores a 4.33/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its simple design and quick learning curve. Users find onboarding smooth, with many noting that staff can adopt the system rapidly due to its intuitive interface.
Infor’s usability scores slightly lower at 3.88/5, with some reviews mentioning that its interface could be more visually appealing and user-friendly. While most find navigation straightforward, the abundance of features can introduce a learning curve.
Given the review data, AutoClerk’s user experience is rated higher overall, especially for properties that value straightforward operation and minimal complexity.
Edge: AutoClerk.
AutoClerk offers core PMS functionality with a handful of features, focusing on property management essentials like guest profiles and basic reporting. It integrates with several third-party systems but lacks advanced modules.
Infor provides a broad set of 20 exclusive features, including housekeeping, guest CRM, calendar view, direct billing, multi-lingual support, cloud deployment, payment processing, revenue management, and automated night audits. These features enable larger hotels to tailor workflows and automate complex tasks.
While AutoClerk covers the basics well, Infor’s extensive feature suite makes it more adaptable for properties with sophisticated operational needs.
Edge: Infor.
AutoClerk’s customer support scores 4.33/5, with reviews praising 24/7 availability and quick resolution times. Its responders are noted for their professionalism, especially during critical incidents.
Infor’s support scores 4.04/5, with reviews highlighting responsiveness and helpfulness but also mentioning occasional delays during system updates. Some users appreciate the support team's kindness, though others suggest that support could be more proactive during bugs and updates.
Given the recent review volume and support ratings, AutoClerk’s support appears slightly more reliable, especially for small properties needing quick assistance.
Edge: AutoClerk.
AutoClerk integrates with 8 verified partners, including popular systems like SiteMinder, Duetto, and Cendyn, covering essential booking, revenue, and payment solutions. Its limited integrations are suitable for properties with straightforward needs.
Infor integrates with 113 verified partners, including Priority Software, Trevo, and Birchstreet, offering extensive options for revenue, accounting, and operational workflows. It supports seamless connection with major booking engines and additional operational tools.
For hotels that rely heavily on integrations, especially with multiple third-party systems, Infor’s larger partner network is a clear advantage.
Edge: Infor.
AutoClerk has only 3 reviews, with an overall rating of 3.5/5, and no recent reviews. The limited feedback makes it difficult to gauge current performance, but support and onboarding are praised in existing comments.
Infor boasts 46 reviews, with an overall rating of 4.04/5 and recent reviews praising its customization, ease of navigation, and support. Larger hotels and chains tend to rate Infor higher, reflecting its value for complex operations.
Considering the volume and recency, Infor’s reviews provide a more reliable reflection of user satisfaction.
Edge: Infor.
Both systems lack publicly available detailed pricing, indicating custom quotes based on hotel size and modules selected. AutoClerk’s model likely involves a flat or per-room fee, common for small PMS providers.
Infor’s pricing is typically based on the number of rooms, modules, and support needed, often requiring a bespoke quote. Expect higher costs due to its extensive feature set and customization options.
Your hotel should contact sales for tailored pricing, but Infor’s broader scope suggests it’s more expensive, suitable for larger properties with complex needs.
Not ideal if you require sophisticated revenue management, extensive integrations, or multi-property management.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if your hotel is small, independent, or prefers a simple, budget-friendly system without numerous modules.
Not ideal if:
The core difference is in scope: AutoClerk offers a focused, easy-to-use PMS suitable for smaller or independent hotels, emphasizing support and simplicity. Infor provides a comprehensive, customizable platform with extensive modules, ideal for larger properties seeking automation and scalability.
If your hotel values quick deployment, straightforward operations, and high support quality, AutoClerk is the better choice. It’s particularly suited for small properties or those new to PMS software.
Choose Infor if your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich system capable of handling complex workflows, revenue management, and multi-property operations. Its broad integration network and extensive modules make it a better fit for larger, growth-oriented hotels.
In conclusion, for most hotels weighing recent reviews and a broader feature set, Infor stands out as the stronger option. However, if ease of use and support are your top priorities, especially for smaller hotels, AutoClerk remains a reliable choice.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Autoclerk (PMS) and Infor HMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Autoclerk (PMS) and Infor HMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Autoclerk (PMS) offers 8 verified integration partners, while Infor HMS offers 113. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Autoclerk (PMS) leads in ease of use at 4.3/5 vs 3.9/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Autoclerk (PMS): No. Infor HMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. AutoClerk, Inc. has an HT Score of 0 and Infor has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor