The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 40 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Autumn shines .
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.6/5) , with exclusive features like Contact Management/CRM and Fully automated revenue management.
Side-by-side ratings based on 40 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 40 |
After analyzing 40 verified reviews, Autumn users most value its , while Infor users highlight customer support, reporting capabilities, forecasting support. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
+
Forecasting Support
▾
|
|
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Rate Recommendations
▾
|
|
|
−
Forecast Accuracy
▾
|
|
|
−
PMS Integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Revenue Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #43 1 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #24 11 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #7 19 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #11 5 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #24 19 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #18 23 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #15 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #35 1 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #22 2 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #28 6 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #7 21 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #16 1 reviews |
According to HTR's product database, Autumn RMS and Infor EzRMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Client Communication Portal | ||
| Contact Management/CRM | ||
| Content & File Management | ||
| Dynamic Pricing | ||
| Seating Management | ||
| Task Management (Tasks & Reminders) |
Showing top differences. 20 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
EzRMS's customer support receives high praise for responsiveness and efficacy, particularly in terms of solving technical issues quickly. However, the... EzRMS's customer support receives high praise for responsiveness and efficacy, particularly in terms of solving technical issues quickly. However, there are suggestions for expanding support hours and having dedicated teams for specific markets.
EzRMS's reporting suite is praised for its flexibility and depth, allowing comprehensive data comparisons and trend analyses. It is effective for both... EzRMS's reporting suite is praised for its flexibility and depth, allowing comprehensive data comparisons and trend analyses. It is effective for both retrospective and predictive business monitoring, aiding in better strategic planning and decision-making.
The system offers extensive support for forecasting, reducing manual input for revenue managers and delivering actionable insights. However, some user... The system offers extensive support for forecasting, reducing manual input for revenue managers and delivering actionable insights. However, some users feel that the system's predictions are sometimes inaccurate and require further refinement to improve reliability.
Where hoteliers push back
EzRMS provides detailed rate recommendations, which users find helpful for optimizing revenue. However, some users report difficulties with the accura... EzRMS provides detailed rate recommendations, which users find helpful for optimizing revenue. However, some users report difficulties with the accuracy and automation of rate uploads, and there's room for improving synchronization with other systems to prevent issues like rate discrepancies.
Many users report issues with the forecast accuracy of EzRMS, although improvements have been noted with recent algorithm updates. There is a general... Many users report issues with the forecast accuracy of EzRMS, although improvements have been noted with recent algorithm updates. There is a general sentiment that while the tool is powerful, forecasts can sometimes diverge significantly from actual outcomes, especially amid dynamic conditions like the COVID-19 pandemic.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Autumn RMS and Infor EzRMS share many core Revenue Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Autumn RMS offers 0 verified integration partners, while Infor EzRMS offers 113. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor EzRMS leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Autumn RMS: No. Infor EzRMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Revenue Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Autumn has an HT Score of 0 and Infor has 25. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor