The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 71 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Avalon shines when it comes to visualization and dashboard quality , with exclusive features like Food & Beverage Reporting, Analysis & Forecasting and Other Income Forecasting, Reporting & Analysis.
Blastness shines , with exclusive features like Profitability Contribution by Customer and Shared Demand Calendar.
Side-by-side ratings based on 71 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 50 | 21 |
After analyzing 71 verified reviews, Avalon users most value its visualization and dashboard quality, customizable reports, user-friendly interface, while Blastness users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Visualization and Dashboard Quality
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizable Reports
▾
|
|
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated Reporting
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Data Accuracy
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Business Intelligence vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 11 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #10 20 reviews | #12 8 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #7 21 reviews | #21 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #7 9 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #10 20 reviews | #15 7 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #9 26 reviews | #12 6 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #8 26 reviews | #15 6 reviews |
| Extended Stay | #10 4 reviews | #13 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #15 1 reviews | #23 0 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #4 20 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #2 45 reviews | #16 0 reviews |
Choosing the right business intelligence (BI) platform for your hotel can dramatically influence your revenue management, operational efficiency, and strategic decision-making. Avalon Analytics and Blastness Business Intelligence both promise to transform your data into actionable insights, but they do so with different strengths. Avalon boasts a higher review count and more recent feedback, indicating a more established presence and current user satisfaction. Which one aligns best with your hotel's needs?
Both platforms aim to streamline data analysis, reduce manual effort, and improve your ability to make informed decisions. Avalon is more comprehensive, offering extensive features tailored for multi-property management, while Blastness emphasizes ease of use and straightforward reporting. Are you prioritizing feature depth or simplicity?
Avalon Analytics and Blastness Business Intelligence are designed to serve hotel operators seeking data-driven insights, but they do diverge in scope and maturity. Avalon, founded in 2021, is a specialized hotel BI platform with a focus on detailed analytics, automation, and multi-property management, boasting over 49 reviews and a 4.94/5 overall rating. Its recent reviews, though limited, indicate a loyal user base that values its reporting and integration capabilities.
Blastness, established in 2004, offers a broader suite of BI tools, with a focus on revenue and property management insights. It has fewer reviews—19 in total—with a perfect 5/5 score, but only one recent review. Its approach favors simplicity, instant reporting, and ease of use, making it attractive for hotels seeking quick wins without deep technical complexity.
The core difference lies in Avalon’s more extensive feature set and multi-property management focus versus Blastness’s straightforward, user-friendly interface. Avalon’s higher review volume and recency of feedback suggest a more tested and trusted solution among hoteliers. Are you ready to prioritize depth and customization or prefer quick, easy insights?
If your hotel requires detailed, customizable analytics across multiple properties, Avalon should be your choice. Its advanced features include automated data gathering, multi-property tracking, and extensive reporting options—perfect for large portfolios or brands needing granular insights.
Conversely, if your hotel values simplicity, rapid deployment, and ease of use, Blastness is likely the better fit. Its intuitive interface, instant reports, and focus on core revenue and performance metrics appeal to smaller hotels or teams without extensive BI experience.
For hotels with complex operations, Avalon’s robust feature set—including forecast locking, sales team productivity tracking, and custom data hierarchies—makes it worth the investment. Smaller properties or teams looking for straightforward, actionable data may find Blastness’s streamlined approach more effective.
Avalon scores a strong 4.8/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its user-friendly dashboards and customizable reports. However, some users mention that multi-property management can slow down processing and sometimes lead to data discrepancies, requiring support. The onboarding process is rated 4.61/5, with users appreciating the guidance but noting potential technical challenges.
Blastness, on the other hand, is rated 4.95/5, with reviews emphasizing its highly intuitive interface that makes navigation effortless for hotel teams. Its design prioritizes simplicity, with instant reporting and minimal setup, which most users find reduces training time and accelerates adoption.
Edge: Blastness.
Avalon offers a comprehensive suite with 13 features exclusive to its platform, including automated data integration, multi-property management, and in-depth forecasting tools. Its features support complex analyses like sales productivity tracking and food & beverage forecasting, making it highly adaptable for large, multi-property portfolios.
Blastness provides 3 unique features, such as Profitability Contribution by Customer, Shared Demand Calendar, and Driver-Based Models, which are focused on basic revenue and performance insights. It excels in providing instant reporting, trend comparisons, and email updates—features that suit hotels prioritizing quick, actionable insights over extensive customization.
Edge: Avalon.
Avalon’s support scores a solid 4.65/5, with reviewers citing helpful onboarding and responsive assistance, even as some mention occasional delays due to platform complexity. The limited number of recent reviews—none in the last six months—reduces confidence in current support responsiveness.
Blastness outperforms slightly with a 4.84/5 rating and reviews praising its proactive, attentive support and easy onboarding. Its recent reviews emphasize quick responses and ongoing customer care, making it the more reliable choice for hotels needing ongoing assistance.
Edge: Blastness.
Avalon integrates with 6 verified partners, including major players like Oracle Hospitality and Mews. Its integrations focus on PMS and RMS systems, simplifying data flow and automation for hotels with existing tech stacks.
Blastness offers 15 verified integrations, including popular systems such as Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and additional partners like Upsellguru, Ask Suite, and hotelcube. Its broader ecosystem supports diverse hotel management software, making it more adaptable for hotels with multiple systems.
Edge: Blastness.
Avalon’s reviews, mostly from hotels in Europe, Asia, and North America, consistently rate it 4.94/5, with high praise for its analytics and strategic insights. The 49 reviews, though not all recent, reflect a mature product valued by users managing brands and large portfolios.
Blastness has fewer reviews—19 total—and all are 5/5, but they are older, with only one recent review. Its praise centers on ease of use and instant insights, but the limited data makes it harder to gauge current satisfaction for complex operations.
Therefore, Avalon’s more substantial review base and recent feedback give it a stronger rating profile.
Edge: Avalon.
Avalon is priced at a straightforward $300 per month, with no freemium or trial options, making it transparent and predictable for hotel budgets. Pricing details for Blastness are unavailable, but given its emphasis on ease and speed, it may follow a different, potentially flexible pricing model.
If budget transparency is critical, Avalon’s fixed monthly fee simplifies decision-making. For hotels seeking custom or scalable pricing, inquiries with Blastness may be necessary.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Avalon and Blastness serve distinct hotel segments and operational styles. Avalon offers a comprehensive, multi-property-focused BI platform with extensive features, ideal for large portfolios and brands that need detailed control and automation. Blastness, with its user-friendly design and streamlined reporting, suits smaller hotels and teams prioritizing ease and speed.
Choose Avalon if your hotel demands detailed analytics, multi-property management, and advanced forecasting—despite a steeper learning curve. Opt for Blastness if your hotel values simplicity, quick deployment, and reliable ongoing support for daily performance monitoring.
Ultimately, Avalon’s more extensive reviews and recent feedback position it as the more trusted and proven choice for larger or more complex hotel operations. Blastness excels for hotels seeking immediate, straightforward insights with minimal fuss.
According to HTR's product database, Avalon Analytics and Blastness Business Intelligence share 9 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated data gathering & integration | ||
| Corporate & Travel Agency Account Tracking | ||
| Driver Based Models | ||
| Multi-Property & Portfolio Level Tracking | ||
| Multi-property management | ||
| Pricing Decision Impact Tracking | ||
| Profitability Contribution by Customer | ||
| Sales team productivity tracking | ||
| Shared Demand Calendar |
Showing top differences. 4 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The constant evolution of tools such as Business Intelligence and RMS, which my team and I use on a daily basis, has led to very interesting results."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Thanks to Blastness, we not only increased our direct bookings and RevPAR, but also gained the confidence to make smarter, data-driven decisions that shape the future of our resort..."
What hoteliers love
The quality of visualizations and dashboards in Avalon is consistently praised. Users find the visual representation of data helps in quickly identify... The quality of visualizations and dashboards in Avalon is consistently praised. Users find the visual representation of data helps in quickly identifying trends, outliers, and strategic insights, making the data easier to understand at a glance.
Avalon's system allows for highly customizable reporting, enabling users to create tailored reports that meet specific needs. This flexibility is part... Avalon's system allows for highly customizable reporting, enabling users to create tailored reports that meet specific needs. This flexibility is particularly beneficial for multi-property management and adapting to unique business requirements, reducing the manual workload.
The majority of reviews highlight Avalon's user-friendly and intuitive interface, which makes navigation easy even for non-revenue team members. The d... The majority of reviews highlight Avalon's user-friendly and intuitive interface, which makes navigation easy even for non-revenue team members. The dashboards are simple yet powerful, aiding in faster and more efficient data interpretation.
Where hoteliers push back
Several reviews have pointed out issues with data accuracy, specifically data discrepancies and errors. These issues sometimes delay meetings and comp... Several reviews have pointed out issues with data accuracy, specifically data discrepancies and errors. These issues sometimes delay meetings and complicate the decision-making process, requiring frequent interactions with Avalon’s support team for corrections.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Avalon Analytics and Blastness Business Intelligence share many core Business Intelligence features, but each has unique capabilities. Avalon Analytics offers 6 verified integration partners, while Blastness Business Intelligence offers 15. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Blastness Business Intelligence leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.8/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Avalon Analytics: No. Blastness Business Intelligence: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Business Intelligence vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Avalon has an HT Score of 21 and Blastness has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor