The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 65 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Avalon shines in ease of use , with exclusive features like Food & Beverage Reporting, Analysis & Forecasting and Other Income Forecasting, Reporting & Analysis.
Fairmas shines , with exclusive features like Open API and Centralized user & role management.
Side-by-side ratings based on 65 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $1,000/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 50 | 15 |
After analyzing 65 verified reviews, Avalon users most value its visualization and dashboard quality, customizable reports, user-friendly interface, while Fairmas users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Visualization and Dashboard Quality
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizable Reports
▾
|
|
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated Reporting
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Data Accuracy
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Business Intelligence vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #21 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #10 20 reviews | #19 11 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #7 21 reviews | #23 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #7 9 reviews | #23 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #10 20 reviews | #26 2 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #9 26 reviews | #23 3 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #8 26 reviews | #20 7 reviews |
| Extended Stay | #10 4 reviews | #21 1 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #15 1 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | — | #11 15 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #2 45 reviews | — |
Choosing the right business intelligence tool for your hotel depends on your specific operational needs and strategic priorities. Avalon Analytics by Avalon offers a comprehensive, highly-rated platform with more recent reviews and a broader user base, making it a compelling choice for most hoteliers. PickupTracking by Fairmas, while functional with notable strengths, has fewer reviews and less recent feedback, which impacts confidence in its current capabilities.
Both products aim to turn your data into actionable insights, but Avalon’s recent surge in reviews and its higher overall rating suggest it is better suited for hoteliers seeking a mature, widely adopted solution. Do you want a platform with proven performance and more advanced features, or are you comfortable with a less-reviewed alternative?
Avalon Analytics and PickupTracking are designed to support hotel managers and revenue teams in making smarter decisions based on data. Avalon focuses on delivering real-time, customizable dashboards, automated reports, and advanced segmentation, which help streamline revenue management processes and reduce manual data handling. PickupTracking, on the other hand, emphasizes daily reservation tracking, forecasting, and performance monitoring with interfaces directly from PMS systems.
Avalon is favored for its extensive features, including AI-driven insights, sales and distribution analytics, and multi-property capabilities. PickupTracking offers essential booking and pickup analysis with integrations from PMS and other data sources but lacks the more advanced analytical features Avalon provides. Given Avalon’s larger review base and recent feedback, it’s the more mature option. Are you prioritizing broad, advanced analytics, or do you need simple, daily reservation tracking?
If your hotel needs a platform that consolidates data across multiple properties with detailed visualizations, automated reporting, and AI insights, Avalon is the better choice. Its strong reviews, especially recent ones, attest to its reliability and ease of use for larger portfolios and strategic decision-making.
If your focus is on daily reservation monitoring, straightforward pickup analysis, and rolling 365-day forecasts, PickupTracking offers a solid, cost-effective solution. Its interface allows quick access to key figures and straightforward evaluation of booking trends without requiring extensive training.
For hotels with complex data needs and a desire for automation, Avalon’s broader feature set and higher review count make it the more compelling option. Conversely, smaller hotels or those with simpler forecasting needs might find PickupTracking adequate. Do you need a robust, multi-feature platform or a focused reservation tracking tool?
Avalon scores a 4.8/5 for ease of use, with reviewers highlighting its intuitive dashboards, customizable reports, and straightforward data visualization. Many users mention the onboarding process as smooth, and staff adoption is high thanks to Avalon’s clear interface and helpful support.
PickupTracking, rated at 4.37/5, is praised for its user-friendly web-based design and quick setup. However, some reviews note that it can be less intuitive when managing complex data or customizing analyses, especially for users unfamiliar with detailed forecasting tools.
Edge: Avalon.
Avalon offers 11 unique features including sales team productivity tracking, corporate account analysis, food & beverage reporting, distribution cost analytics, forecast locking, and AI-powered insights. PickupTracking features 2 exclusive capabilities: open API and centralized user & role management.
Avalon’s comprehensive suite supports strategic revenue management, operational insights, and automation, while PickupTracking focuses on essential booking and pickup tracking with flexible evaluations. Avalon’s broader feature set makes it more suitable for larger, data-driven teams.
Edge: Avalon.
Avalon’s support ratings are slightly lower at 4.65/5 but are consistently praised for their expertise and responsiveness, with reviews noting the valuable support from their team. Users state that Avalon provides reliable assistance, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting.
PickupTracking outperforms Avalon with a 4.83/5 rating, with reviewers emphasizing the personal contact and hotel background of the support team. They describe it as “helpful, modern, and quick to respond,” with praise for their proactive approach.
Edge: PickupTracking.
Avalon integrates with six verified partners, including PMS and revenue systems like RMS, Oracle Hospitality, and Mews. PickupTracking boasts 34 verified integrations, including popular PMS, RMS, and benchmarking tools such as Sage, Revinate, and RateGain.
Having more integrations can simplify data management, especially for hotels with complex tech stacks. PickupTracking’s extensive list offers broader compatibility, but Avalon’s core integrations are well-established and sufficient for many properties.
Edge: PickupTracking.
Avalon’s overall rating is 4.94/5 based on 49 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its strategic insights and automation capabilities. Hotels in various segments, especially branded and resort properties, consistently rate Avalon highly for its value and ease of use.
PickupTracking has a solid 4.63/5 from 15 reviews, with praise for its simplicity and support. However, fewer recent reviews mean less current user feedback, impacting confidence in its ongoing performance.
Edge: Avalon.
Avalon is priced at $300.00 per month with no trial or implementation fees, making it accessible for many hotels. PickupTracking costs $1,000.00 per month, again without trial or setup fees, reflecting its focus on more extensive data integration and forecasting features.
While Avalon offers a lower-cost entry point, PickupTracking’s higher price may be justified for properties needing its specific daily pickup and forecast capabilities, especially those managing multiple properties.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Avalon Analytics excels as a comprehensive, user-friendly BI platform with a broad feature set and strong recent reviews. Its ability to deliver real-time, customizable insights makes it ideal for hotels with complex data needs and larger portfolios.
PickupTracking provides essential reservation and pickup analysis with a focus on daily forecasting, offering a more straightforward, budget-friendly option. Its broader integrations and support are advantageous, but fewer recent reviews mean less confidence in its current performance.
If your hotel aims for strategic, data-driven decision-making with proven reliability, Avalon is the clearer choice. However, if daily reservation tracking and ease of use are your priorities, PickupTracking can meet those needs at a lower cost.
According to HTR's product database, Avalon Analytics and PickupTracking (by Fairmas) share 11 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Corporate & Travel Agency Account Tracking | ||
| Distribution Cost Analytics | ||
| Food & Beverage Reporting, Analysis & Forecasting | ||
| Forecast Locking & Workflows | ||
| Open API | ||
| Pricing Decision Impact Tracking | ||
| Sales team productivity tracking |
Showing top differences. 1 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
The quality of visualizations and dashboards in Avalon is consistently praised. Users find the visual representation of data helps in quickly identify... The quality of visualizations and dashboards in Avalon is consistently praised. Users find the visual representation of data helps in quickly identifying trends, outliers, and strategic insights, making the data easier to understand at a glance.
Avalon's system allows for highly customizable reporting, enabling users to create tailored reports that meet specific needs. This flexibility is part... Avalon's system allows for highly customizable reporting, enabling users to create tailored reports that meet specific needs. This flexibility is particularly beneficial for multi-property management and adapting to unique business requirements, reducing the manual workload.
The majority of reviews highlight Avalon's user-friendly and intuitive interface, which makes navigation easy even for non-revenue team members. The d... The majority of reviews highlight Avalon's user-friendly and intuitive interface, which makes navigation easy even for non-revenue team members. The dashboards are simple yet powerful, aiding in faster and more efficient data interpretation.
Where hoteliers push back
Several reviews have pointed out issues with data accuracy, specifically data discrepancies and errors. These issues sometimes delay meetings and comp... Several reviews have pointed out issues with data accuracy, specifically data discrepancies and errors. These issues sometimes delay meetings and complicate the decision-making process, requiring frequent interactions with Avalon’s support team for corrections.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Avalon Analytics and PickupTracking (by Fairmas) share many core Business Intelligence features, but each has unique capabilities. Avalon Analytics offers 6 verified integration partners, while PickupTracking (by Fairmas) offers 34. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Avalon Analytics leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 4.4/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Avalon Analytics: No. PickupTracking (by Fairmas): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Business Intelligence vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Avalon has an HT Score of 21 and Fairmas has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor