The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 1,414 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cloudbeds shines in Ease of Use and Customer Support — especially for casino properties (4.8/5), with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 1,414 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 1,414 |
After analyzing 1,414 verified reviews, Antfor users most value its , while Cloudbeds users highlight ease of use and onboarding, calendar and visual reservation management, reporting and analytics. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of use and onboarding
▾
|
|
|
+
Calendar and visual reservation management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel management and OTA synchronization
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support responsiveness and human access
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile app limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
Billing, folio, and invoicing workflows
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 694 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 222 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 48 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #15 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 562 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #4 242 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #6 126 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #2 100 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #2 468 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #7 175 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #3 340 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #7 12 reviews |
Choosing between Avalon by Antfor and Cloudbeds PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. Both aim to improve your management processes, but they differ vastly in scope, maturity, and user feedback. Avalon’s AI-driven approach promises tailored insights, while Cloudbeds offers an extensive, proven platform trusted worldwide. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s current capabilities and future plans?
Avalon’s core focus on review analysis and recommendations is promising but untested by recent reviews. Cloudbeds, conversely, boasts over 1,000 recent reviews, predominantly positive, showcasing its market presence and reliability. Do you prioritize innovative review insights or a comprehensive, battle-tested system?
Avalon is marketed as an AI-driven review and recommendation tool, designed to enhance customer experience and operational decisions through advanced data analysis. It aims to automate review insights and suggest improvements, but lacks evident integrations or extensive feature sets. Cloudbeds, on the other hand, provides a complete property management ecosystem with reservation, distribution, and revenue tools integrated into one platform.
Avalon appears suited for hotels focusing on guest experience optimization through review management, especially if manual review analysis hampers your team. Cloudbeds is tailored for properties seeking operational efficiency, multi-channel distribution, and revenue growth, proven by its many awards and a large user base.
Given the absence of recent reviews for Avalon, its effectiveness remains uncertain. Cloudbeds’s recent, extensive positive feedback—over 80 recent reviews and a 4.63/5 rating—makes it a more reliable choice for most hotels.
If your hotel needs a review-focused tool to analyze guest feedback and generate actionable insights, Avalon might seem appealing. However, without recent user reviews or visible market deployment, its impact is unproven, making it risky for hotels that require proven solutions.
For hotels that want a comprehensive, established property management system capable of handling reservations, distribution, revenue, and guest engagement at scale, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its vast feature set (64 features unique to Cloudbeds), extensive integrations, and large, recent review base demonstrate its suitability for hotels of all sizes.
In summary, choose Avalon only if your focus is solely on review analysis and your hotel can accept a less established, AI-centric approach. For operational control, scalability, and proven performance, Cloudbeds is the safer, more effective pick.
Avalon’s user experience is not well-documented, and there are no recent reviews to assess its UI or onboarding process. Cloudbeds, however, scores 4.61/5 for ease of use, with many users praising its intuitive design and straightforward onboarding. Over 80 recent reviews highlight how quickly staff can adapt to Cloudbeds’ interface.
Based on available data, Cloudbeds offers a more polished, user-friendly experience that minimizes training time and eases staff adoption. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Avalon’s core feature is review analysis and tailored recommendations, with no additional functionalities listed. Cloudbeds offers 64 features, including a channel manager, booking engine, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, automated night audit, and more—covering every aspect of property management.
With the sheer breadth and depth of features, Cloudbeds clearly outperforms Avalon. If your hotel needs a robust, all-in-one system, the advantage goes to Cloudbeds. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Avalon’s support ratings are unavailable, and no recent reviews mention its support quality. Cloudbeds has a 4.41/5 customer support rating, with many reviews praising its responsiveness and helpfulness. One reviewer said, “Cloudbeds’ support team is awesome and responsive,” indicating high satisfaction.
Given the large volume of recent reviews and positive feedback, Cloudbeds demonstrates strong support. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Avalon has no recent reviews or ratings, leaving its user satisfaction unverified. Cloudbeds, with over 1,000 reviews and a 4.63/5 rating, is highly rated across various hotel segments, including boutique hotels and hostels. Recent feedback shows a 91% likelihood to recommend, indicating broad satisfaction.
For hotelier confidence, Cloudbeds’s high and recent ratings make it the superior choice. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Avalon’s pricing is not publicly available, which suggests it may be tailored or in early development stages. Cloudbeds charges a $600 monthly base fee, with no free tier or trial.
Given the transparent pricing and large-scale deployment, Cloudbeds offers predictable costs aligned with its market presence. Avalon’s unknown pricing makes budgeting uncertain; thus, Cloudbeds provides clearer value.
Avalon by Antfor presents an innovative, AI-driven review analysis concept that might benefit hotels heavily reliant on reputation management. Its lack of recent reviews or proven deployment makes it too uncertain for most hotels needing dependable systems.
Cloudbeds, with its extensive features, broad integrations, and overwhelmingly positive recent reviews, remains the reliable choice for hotels aiming to streamline operations, increase revenue, and deliver excellent guest experiences. Its longstanding market presence and high satisfaction ratings make it the safer, more strategic investment.
Choose Cloudbeds if operational efficiency and proven results are your priorities. Otherwise, Avalon might suit niche needs but carries more risk without recent validation.
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Accounting & Finance
|
|
|
| Direct billing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| Automated night audit | ||
|
▾
Marketing & Ecommerce
|
|
|
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Administration & Configuration
|
|
|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| On premise | ||
|
▾
Customer Management
|
|
|
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Front Office
|
|
|
| Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text) | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Automated night audit | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Task Management | ||
| Automated reminders | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Groups Management
|
|
|
| Group functionality | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Guest Experience
|
|
|
| Integrated ID & Passport Scanner | ||
| Digital Registration | ||
| Guest App | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| ID Scanning & Registration Pre-fill | ||
| Lobby Kiosk | ||
|
▾
Housekeeping
|
|
|
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Housekeeping Mobile App | ||
| Real-Time Status Updates | ||
| Automated Assignments | ||
| Real Time Reporting | ||
| Shift Planning | ||
| Employee Messaging | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
|
▾
Payments
|
|
|
| Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
|
▾
Reservations Management
|
|
|
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Drag-n-Drop Tapechart | ||
| Rate Management | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
| Rules Based Room Assignments | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Revenue Management
|
|
|
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Base Pricing | ||
|
▾
Taxes & Compliance
|
|
|
| PCI Compliant | ||
| GDPR Compliant | ||
| SOC2 Complaint | ||
| Tax Configuration | ||
|
▾
Support & Training
|
|
|
| Online 24/7 support | ||
|
▾
Food & Beverage
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
Spa
|
|
|
| Spa & Wellness Module |
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
What hoteliers love
A common theme is that Cloudbeds is relatively easy to learn, visually clear, and suitable for small properties or teams with limited technical skills... A common theme is that Cloudbeds is relatively easy to learn, visually clear, and suitable for small properties or teams with limited technical skills. Some reviewers praise the onboarding and training materials, while others say setup can be slow or incomplete, especially during initial implementation.
Users most often praise Cloudbeds for its clear calendar view, which makes it easy to see room status, move bookings, split stays, and handle check-in... Users most often praise Cloudbeds for its clear calendar view, which makes it easy to see room status, move bookings, split stays, and handle check-ins and changes visually. Reviewers say this reduces clicks, speeds up front-desk work, and helps staff understand the property at a glance.
Users frequently mention Cloudbeds’ reporting as useful for reviewing performance, occupancy, revenue, and operational trends in one place. At the sam... Users frequently mention Cloudbeds’ reporting as useful for reviewing performance, occupancy, revenue, and operational trends in one place. At the same time, many want more customization, faster downloads, and more modern dashboard-style visualizations instead of Excel-like exports.
Where hoteliers push back
Support is a major differentiator in the reviews, but many users want faster access to a human and fewer chatbot bottlenecks. Some praise quick, helpf... Support is a major differentiator in the reviews, but many users want faster access to a human and fewer chatbot bottlenecks. Some praise quick, helpful chat or implementation help, while others ask for phone, video, or direct-agent support for urgent front-desk issues.
A major recurring issue is that the mobile app is often viewed as read-only or too limited for real operational work. Reviewers repeatedly want the ab... A major recurring issue is that the mobile app is often viewed as read-only or too limited for real operational work. Reviewers repeatedly want the ability to create and edit reservations, manage rooms, and receive real-time notifications directly in the app instead of switching back to the web browser or email.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Avalon and Cloudbeds PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Avalon offers 14 verified integration partners, while Cloudbeds PMS offers 208. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Cloudbeds PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Avalon: No. Cloudbeds PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Antfor has an HT Score of 0 and Cloudbeds has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property