The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 515 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
SHR Group shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for Boutique Hotels properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile optimized/responsive and Urgency messaging.
Planet shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 515 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 512 | 3 |
After analyzing 515 verified reviews, SHR Group users most value its proactive customer support, integration capabilities, intuitive interface, while Planet users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Proactive customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration capabilities
▾
|
|
|
+
Intuitive interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Rate and inventory management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Backend navigation improvements
▾
|
|
|
−
Visual and aesthetic design
▾
|
|
|
−
Support documentation and training
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #8 76 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 369 reviews | #39 1 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 39 reviews | #36 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #5 16 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #3 232 reviews | #40 1 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 320 reviews | #41 1 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 166 reviews | #41 1 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #4 32 reviews | #38 0 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #8 39 reviews | #31 1 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #2 440 reviews | #38 1 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #15 11 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #16 3 reviews | — |
Choosing the right booking engine is critical to maximizing your direct bookings, revenue, and guest experience. Both SHR Booking Engine by SHR Group and Planet Booking Engine aim to streamline this process, but their approaches and track records differ significantly. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, support needs, and the features that matter most.
While Planet's small number of reviews and limited recent feedback offer less confidence, SHR Group's extensive, recent, and positive review profile provides a clearer picture of performance. Which platform will really meet your hotel’s needs?
Both SHR and Planet address the core issue of converting website visitors into bookings with online reservation solutions. SHR’s platform emphasizes customization, robust features, and integration, while Planet focuses on providing a straightforward, easy-to-use booking process.
However, SHR’s platform scores a 4.86/5 overall rating based on 339 reviews, with recent feedback in the last six months. Planet, on the other hand, has only 3 reviews—one from August 2023—and a 0/5 overall rating, which diminishes confidence in its current reliability and support quality.
The key divergence lies in customer support and feature depth. SHR’s customers praise its proactive, knowledgeable support and feature-rich environment, while Planet's limited recent reviews and poor ratings suggest unresolved issues and a lack of ongoing development.
If your hotel needs a proven, well-supported booking engine with extensive features, SHR is the safer choice. Are you willing to risk less stability and support with Planet?
If your hotel is a mid-to-large property requiring advanced features, multiple integrations, and dedicated support, SHR is the better fit. Its feature set includes mobile responsiveness, A/B testing, special offers, loyalty integrations, and multi-lingual/multi-currency support—features only available in SHR’s platform.
For small hotels or independent operators with minimal needs, Planet offers a simple, no-frills booking experience. However, with only three reviews and a recent rating of 1/5, Planet’s platform has shown signs of instability and limited support, making SHR the more reliable choice for long-term growth.
Hotels seeking scalability, customization, and proven performance should lean toward SHR. Those with basic, budget-conscious needs might consider Planet, but the limited evidence casts doubt on its current viability.
SHR’s platform boasts a 4.67/5 ease of use rating from 339 reviews, with users describing it as intuitive and straightforward once familiar with the system. Support and onboarding are rated at 4.63/5, and many hotels highlight the helpful onboarding process and user-friendly interface, even praising its ability to accommodate complex rate plans.
Planet’s ease of use, however, is rated only 1.67/5 by the scant reviews, with one user criticizing its interface as “clunky” and “not intuitive,” especially for multi-language and international use. The lack of recent positive feedback further suggests ongoing usability challenges.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine
SHR offers 46 exclusive features not found in Planet, including mobile optimization, A/B testing, urgency messaging, pooled inventory, pre- and post-stay emails, gift vouchers, multi-room bookings, loyalty program integration, and social media booking support. These features cater to a range of marketing, revenue, and operational needs.
Planet’s platform appears to have no unique features beyond basic booking functions, focusing on simplicity rather than flexibility. The absence of advanced tools means SHR is clearly the feature leader, especially for hotels needing sophisticated control and marketing tools.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine
Customer support and onboarding ratings heavily favor SHR, with a 4.86/5 rating from 339 reviews, and praise for proactive, knowledgeable service. Hoteliers report quick responses, helpful account managers, and effective resolution of issues, making support a standout strength.
Planet’s customer support score is only 1/5 based on 3 reviews, with complaints about unresponsiveness, ongoing issues, and a lack of support during critical moments. This significant gap suggests that if support quality is a priority, SHR exceeds expectations.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine
SHR boasts 81 verified partners, with integrations spanning critical hotel systems like PMS, channel managers, and payment providers. Shared integrations include Cendyn, GuestRevu, and others, with additional partners like Criton and WebRezPro exclusive to SHR.
Planet offers 195 verified partners, but a closer look reveals many are unrelated to core hotel operations and have limited integration depth. Shared partners include major PMS and channel tools, but the overall ecosystem appears less mature and tested.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine
SHR’s reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.86/5 rating from 339 recent reviews, and a 96% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across various segments, especially boutique, city center, and resort properties, praise its reliability, features, and support.
Planet’s minimal reviews and a 0/5 score, combined with recent criticism, provide no confidence in its current performance or hotel satisfaction levels. Users are clearly more satisfied with SHR’s platform, especially in recent feedback.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine
Pricing details for both platforms are not publicly disclosed, which is common in enterprise hotel systems. Typically, pricing depends on hotel size, features, and support needs, making direct comparison challenging.
However, SHR’s robust features and support suggest a higher, value-driven investment, whereas Planet’s basic approach might appeal to hotels seeking minimal upfront costs—though its performance issues could offset initial savings.
Not ideal if you:
Not ideal if you:
In summary, SHR Booking Engine is the stronger choice for hotels looking for a feature-rich, well-supported, and proven platform. Its extensive review base, recent positive feedback, and comprehensive capabilities make it the clear leader.
Planet’s minimal and outdated reviews, combined with its poor recent ratings, suggest it’s not a reliable option for hotels aiming for growth or operational efficiency.
Choose SHR if your hotel values stability, advanced features, and proactive support.
Consider Planet only if your needs are basic, your budget is tight, and you’re willing to accept potential reliability issues.
Ultimately, SHR represents a safer, more scalable solution with a track record of success. For your hotel’s revenue and guest experience, it’s the platform you can trust to deliver consistent results.
According to HTR's product database, SHR Booking Engine (BE) and Planet Booking Engine share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| A/B testing & optimization | ||
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Pooled inventory | ||
| Pre-stay emails | ||
| Special offers & discounts | ||
| Urgency messaging |
Showing top differences. 34 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently commend SHR's proactive and responsive customer support. Account managers and support teams are described as very helpful, knowledgea... Users frequently commend SHR's proactive and responsive customer support. Account managers and support teams are described as very helpful, knowledgeable, and quick to respond to issues. The guidance provided by customer success teams is considered invaluable for optimizing use of the software. This topic is covered in 30 reviews.
A key feature frequently highlighted is the robust integration capabilities of the platform. Windsurfer CRS efficiently communicates with various PMSs... A key feature frequently highlighted is the robust integration capabilities of the platform. Windsurfer CRS efficiently communicates with various PMSs, channel managers, and CRM tools, ensuring seamless operations and up-to-date information across systems. However, some users desire improved integration with additional systems and platforms. This topic is seen in 18 reviews.
Users commend the intuitive interface of Windsurfer CRS, which makes the booking process seamless for guests and easy for hotel staff to manage. The e... Users commend the intuitive interface of Windsurfer CRS, which makes the booking process seamless for guests and easy for hotel staff to manage. The ease of setting up and managing rate plans, the flexibility to customize booking pages, and straightforward navigation contribute to overall efficiency. This topic is identified in 20 reviews.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users have noted that while the frontend is user-friendly, the backend navigation and filtering options could be more intuitive and user-friendly... Some users have noted that while the frontend is user-friendly, the backend navigation and filtering options could be more intuitive and user-friendly. Improvements in these areas could significantly enhance efficiency and user satisfaction. This topic is identified in 12 reviews.
Some users suggest that the visual aesthetics of the booking engine could be improved. Enhancing the polished and modern design of the user interface... Some users suggest that the visual aesthetics of the booking engine could be improved. Enhancing the polished and modern design of the user interface could further elevate the overall booking experience and make it more visually appealing. This topic is discussed in 6 reviews.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. SHR Booking Engine (BE) and Planet Booking Engine share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. SHR Booking Engine (BE) offers 81 verified integration partners, while Planet Booking Engine offers 194. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. SHR Booking Engine (BE) leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 1.7/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
SHR Booking Engine (BE): No. Planet Booking Engine: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. SHR Group has an HT Score of 46 and Planet has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor