The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 315 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Net Affinity shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile optimized/responsive and Urgency messaging.
Planet shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 315 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $800/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 312 | 3 |
After analyzing 315 verified reviews, Net Affinity users most value its user-friendly booking engine, proactive account management, technical issues and support, while Planet users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Booking Engine
▾
|
|
|
+
Proactive Account Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Technical Issues and Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Continuous Improvements
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
CMS Challenges
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #7 98 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #5 178 reviews | #39 1 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #12 12 reviews | #36 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #11 5 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #7 131 reviews | #40 1 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #6 146 reviews | #41 1 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #5 92 reviews | #41 1 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #5 27 reviews | #38 0 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #15 7 reviews | #31 1 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #4 287 reviews | #38 1 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #17 7 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #13 4 reviews | — |
Choosing between Net Affinity and Planet Booking Engine ultimately depends on your hotel’s specific needs, existing infrastructure, and growth goals. Both products aim to streamline your booking process, but they differ significantly in features, support, and market presence. While Net Affinity’s booking engine is highly rated, modern, and feature-rich, Planet’s platform is simpler and more suited for small or budget-conscious properties. Which aligns better with your hotel’s strategy?
Net Affinity and Planet both serve as booking engines designed to increase direct reservations, but they do so with contrasting approaches. Net Affinity is a comprehensive, cloud-based platform built from scratch to integrate with advanced digital marketing and reporting tools, with a focus on high conversion and user experience. Planet, by comparison, offers a straightforward, lightweight booking system suitable for smaller, simpler hotels seeking quick setup.
Net Affinity’s platform is more modern, boasting a mobile-first design, a detailed set of 45 unique features, and a history of high customer satisfaction backed by over 223 reviews, most within the last six months. Planet’s limited feature set and minimal recent reviews make it less transparent and less current, though still functional for basic needs. Are you prepared to invest in a scalable, feature-rich platform, or do you prefer a low-cost, no-frills solution?
If your hotel needs a highly customizable, technologically advanced booking engine that integrates seamlessly with your existing PMS and digital marketing efforts, Net Affinity is the clear choice. Its high review count and recent customer feedback indicate a mature, well-supported product suitable for mid-sized and large hotels seeking growth.
If you operate a small property, boutique, or independent hotel with straightforward booking needs, and your priority is quick implementation without extensive features, Planet may suffice. However, given its sparse recent reviews and limited feature set, it’s better suited for very basic operations or budget-constrained properties.
For hotels requiring a scalable, high-performance solution with proven results, Net Affinity’s extensive capabilities and support make it the safer option. For those with minimal complexity or limited budgets, Planet’s simplicity could be enough, but expect fewer updates and less support.
Net Affinity’s user interface has a rated ease of use of 4.59/5, with many users highlighting its intuitive design, straightforward onboarding, and helpful customer support. Its system is built for both technical and non-technical users, with clear documentation and responsive assistance, making staff adoption smooth.
Planet’s ease of use is rated just 1.67/5, with reviews indicating it is a basic, less user-friendly platform. Users note that while initial setup might be simple for very basic configurations, the interface lacks polish, and ongoing management can be cumbersome, especially for non-technical staff.
Edge: Net Affinity.
Net Affinity offers 45 unique features, including multi-currency, multi-lingual support, wedding and corporate modules, automated reporting, special offers, loyalty integration, social media links, and advanced rate management options. These functionalities support complex rate structures, marketing strategies, and guest engagement.
Planet’s platform does not list any exclusive features, implying a minimal set designed for straightforward reservations. It lacks advanced functionalities such as multi-lingual support, automated emails, or integrated marketing tools, limiting its adaptability for growing or complex properties.
Edge: Net Affinity.
Net Affinity’s support ratings are outstanding, with a 4.79/5 score, praised for proactive account management, rapid issue resolution, and knowledgeable assistance. Customer testimonials describe their support team as ‘excellent’ and ‘dedicated,’ often resolving queries within hours and providing ongoing strategic advice.
Planet’s customer support is rated only 1/5, with reviews describing it as virtually non-existent. Users report delayed responses, unhelpful assistance, and difficulty obtaining technical support, which can be a significant drawback for hotels relying on dependable help.
Edge: Net Affinity.
Net Affinity integrates with 62 verified partners, including major PMS, channel managers, and marketing tools like Right Revenue, GuestCentric, and TrustYou. Its extensive integration network ensures your hotel can connect seamlessly with existing tech stacks.
Planet offers 195 verified integrations, including many popular systems like Innspire, RevControl, and HotelRunner. While it appears more connected, the lack of recent reviews and limited feature transparency raise questions about the depth and reliability of these integrations.
Edge: Net Affinity.
Net Affinity’s ratings are significantly higher, with an overall score of 4.82/5 based on 223 reviews, many recent. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, support, and impact on revenue, with a 94% likelihood to recommend.
Planet’s minimal reviews, only three, and a rating of 0/5, suggest it’s not widely adopted or positively reviewed recently. The limited feedback indicates it’s not a preferred choice among hotels looking for scalable, high-performance booking engines.
Edge: Net Affinity.
Net Affinity charges a flat $800 monthly fee, with no implementation or setup fees, and no trial available. This cost reflects its enterprise-level functionality and ongoing support.
Planet’s pricing details are unavailable, which suggests it may be a lower-cost or less flexible solution, possibly with additional fees or limited support. Given the lack of transparency, it’s essential to clarify costs before committing.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Net Affinity and Planet target different segments. Net Affinity delivers a comprehensive, high-performing booking engine, built for hotels seeking growth, automation, and deep integration. Its reviews and recent customer feedback affirm its leadership, especially in support, features, and overall satisfaction.
Planet provides a basic, accessible option for small hotels or those with very limited needs. Its lack of recent reviews, limited features, and support challenges make it less suitable for hotels aiming to scale or compete at a higher level.
Choose Net Affinity if you want a future-proof, feature-rich system with proven results. Opt for Planet if your needs are minimal, your hotel size is small, or you’re looking for a budget-friendly entry point—just be aware of its limitations.
Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $800/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Net Affinity (Booking Engine) and Planet Booking Engine share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Tariffs | ||
| Urgency messaging | ||
| Wedding & corporate booking modules |
Showing top differences. 33 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"I am very happy with the collaborative relationship we have with Net Affinity and the results we have seen together. There reporting on both marketing and e-commerce give us great..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Many users commend the Netaffinity booking engine for its simplicity, ease of use, and effectiveness in increasing direct bookings. It allows for crea... Many users commend the Netaffinity booking engine for its simplicity, ease of use, and effectiveness in increasing direct bookings. It allows for creating and editing rates and packages effortlessly. However, some users mention a steep learning curve and the potential for improvement in search functionalities and link integration.
Many reviews highlight the proactive and supportive role of Netaffinity account managers. They are commended for their timely assistance, constructive... Many reviews highlight the proactive and supportive role of Netaffinity account managers. They are commended for their timely assistance, constructive feedback, and personalized support, which users find instrumental in improving their online performance. Regular communication and detailed monthly reviews are appreciated.
Some reviews mention occasional technical issues with the booking engine and other functionalities. However, users also highlight the quick and effici... Some reviews mention occasional technical issues with the booking engine and other functionalities. However, users also highlight the quick and efficient support provided by Netaffinity's technical team in resolving these issues. Suggestions for improvement include preemptive notifications of issues and better support documentation.
Where hoteliers push back
While many find Netaffinity's CMS user-friendly once accustomed, there are complaints about its initial complexity and functionality. Users suggest im... While many find Netaffinity's CMS user-friendly once accustomed, there are complaints about its initial complexity and functionality. Users suggest improvements in navigation, content management, and the overall intuitiveness of the system. Regular system updates and better training materials are often recommended.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Net Affinity (Booking Engine) and Planet Booking Engine share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. Net Affinity (Booking Engine) offers 62 verified integration partners, while Planet Booking Engine offers 194. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Net Affinity (Booking Engine) leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 1.7/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Net Affinity (Booking Engine): No. Planet Booking Engine: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Net Affinity has an HT Score of 42 and Planet has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor