The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 269 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
SHR Group shines when it comes to proactive client management — especially for brand properties (4.8/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile Optimized/Responsive.
STAAH shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 269 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 262 | 7 |
After analyzing 269 verified reviews, SHR Group users most value its proactive client management, website design, reporting and analytics, while STAAH users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Proactive Client Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Website Design
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
Digital Marketing
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Voucher System
▾
|
|
|
−
Template Limitations
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Website Design vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #9 30 reviews | #19 4 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #1 208 reviews | #26 3 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #6 13 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #14 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #4 115 reviews | #24 4 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 163 reviews | #27 2 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 84 reviews | #22 2 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #4 16 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #11 8 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 244 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #6 5 reviews | #4 6 reviews |
Choosing the right website design platform for your hotel can significantly impact your online presence and direct bookings. Both SHR Website Design by SHR Group and STAAH InstantWebsite aim to help your hotel stand out online, but they diverge in features, user experience, and support. SHR Group offers a comprehensive, data-driven, customizable web solution with a strong reputation backed by more reviews, while STAAH provides a simple, accessible website builder with a focus on ease of use. Which meets your hotel’s specific needs better?
Both products serve the core purpose of building your hotel’s website and driving bookings, but they approach the task differently. SHR Website Design emphasizes tailored, user-centric designs, complex integrations, and extensive features that create highly customized websites, especially suitable for hotels seeking a premium, brand-reflective online presence. Conversely, STAAH InstantWebsite prioritizes quick setup, ease of editing, and affordability, making it ideal for smaller hotels or those wanting a straightforward, attractive website with minimal fuss.
While SHR Group has a higher review count (169 vs. 7) and more recent feedback—enhancing confidence in current performance—STAAH’s ratings are slightly higher (4.93 vs. 4.87), indicating strong user satisfaction. Do your priorities lean toward customization and advanced features, or simplicity and quick deployment?
If your hotel needs a highly personalized website with robust functionality, SEO tools, and detailed analytics, SHR Website Design is the clear choice—especially if you operate in a competitive, brand-conscious market. It’s better suited for hotels that want a website reflecting their unique identity, with features like multi-lingual support, social media integration, and fully customizable themes.
On the other hand, if your hotel prioritizes fast setup, easy content updates, and a cost-effective solution, STAAH InstantWebsite is the better fit. It’s perfect for small to mid-sized properties that need a professional, mobile-optimized website with integrated booking capabilities, without the need for complex customization or extensive integrations.
For larger hotels or those with specific branding needs, SHR’s extensive feature set and proven ROI make it the preferable option. If simplicity, affordability, and rapid implementation are your main goals, STAAH provides a solid, straightforward alternative.
SHR’s platform has an ease of use score of 4.69/5, with positive feedback on its user interface and onboarding process. However, some users find its CMS and advanced features require a learning curve, especially during initial setup and integration phases. The reviews emphasize its rich feature set, which can be daunting for less tech-savvy teams.
STAAH InstantWebsite scores slightly lower at 4.57/5 but stands out for its simplicity. Reviewers praise its intuitive drag-and-drop editor, quick content management, and easy customization, making it accessible even for non-technical staff.
Edge: STAAH.
SHR Website Design boasts 14 unique features, including ADA compliance, SSL/HTTPS security, Google Analytics, multi-lingual capabilities, customizable themes, and a drag-and-drop page builder. It also offers integrated booking engines, social media plugins, SEO tools, and tailored attractions maps—features that give your website a competitive edge.
STAAH InstantWebsite, by comparison, offers core website features with integrated booking, mobile optimization, SEO tools, and Google Maps. While it doesn’t have the same depth of advanced features, its straightforward template system makes it easy to produce an attractive, functional site quickly.
Edge: SHR Website Design.
SHR Group’s support is rated 4.85/5, with reviews highlighting their proactive, knowledgeable service and dedicated account management. Clients often mention their support team’s responsiveness and assistance in navigating complex setups, though some indicate the onboarding process can be challenging.
STAAH’s support scores a perfect 5/5, with reviewers emphasizing their quick, efficient assistance and availability of their team. Customers appreciate how the team helps resolve issues swiftly and makes the platform easy to operate.
Edge: STAAH.
SHR Group connects with 81 verified partners, including major PMS and booking system integrations such as Criton, Profitroom, and Umi Digital. Its extensive integration network ensures your website can work smoothly within your existing tech ecosystem, facilitating advanced data analytics and operations.
STAAH integrates with 54 partners, including key players like BookLogic, Preno, and GuestTraction. While slightly fewer in number, STAAH’s integrations cover the essentials, especially for channel management and booking engines.
Edge: SHR Website Design.
SHR’s overall rating of 4.87/5 derives from 169 reviews, with recent feedback reaffirming its value. Hotels in diverse segments—city center, boutique, and resorts—appreciate its customization and ROI, with comments like “The support and responsiveness have helped us grow revenue significantly,” highlighting its impact.
STAAH’s rating of 4.93/5 from only 7 reviews indicates very high satisfaction, especially among smaller properties and budget-focused hotels. Users praise its simplicity, mobile responsiveness, and support, with remarks like “It’s easy to manage and update, making my life much simpler.”
Edge: STAAH.
SHR Group charges a base price of $900, with no freemium or monthly per-room fees, indicating a straightforward, premium pricing structure. Pricing details for STAAH InstantWebsite are not publicly specified, but typically, website builders with similar features tend to be lower cost or included in broader packages.
Exact costs for STAAH’s website solution are unavailable, but given its focus on affordability and ease, it’s likely more accessible for smaller hotels or those with limited budgets.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers quick setup without extensive customization, or if your team has limited technical capabilities.
Not ideal if your hotel requires complex customization, multi-language support, or advanced web features.
SHR Website Design offers a comprehensive, customizable platform supported by a large user base and extensive integrations. Its strengths lie in tailored designs, robust features, and data-driven insights, making it ideal for hotels seeking a high-end, personalized website experience.
STAAH InstantWebsite excels in simplicity and speed, providing an attractive, mobile-optimized website with integrated booking at a lower entry point. It suits hotels that want to quickly establish a professional online presence without the need for extensive customization.
If your hotel values detailed control, advanced features, and proven ROI, SHR is the stronger choice. For hotels that prioritize ease, affordability, and quick results, STAAH provides a compelling alternative.
For hotels with a large or complex digital strategy, SHR Website Design delivers a feature-rich, highly customizable solution that can truly elevate your online presence. Its track record, extensive integrations, and high review volume make it the clearer pick for serious hoteliers.
If simplicity, speed, and affordability are your primary concerns, STAAH InstantWebsite offers an effective, user-friendly platform that enables you to launch a professional website with minimal effort. Its high satisfaction ratings and mobile focus make it ideal for smaller or budget-conscious properties.
In conclusion, for most established hotels seeking a future-proof, scalable website, SHR Group’s platform is the definitive choice. If your hotel is smaller or just starting out, STAAH InstantWebsite provides an efficient, reliable path to online success.
According to HTR's product database, SHR Website Design and STAAH InstantWebsite share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ADA Compliant | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Customizable Attractions Maps | ||
| Google Analytics Connection | ||
| Mobile Optimized/Responsive | ||
| Security Protocals (SSL/HTTPS) |
Showing top differences. 2 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Clients commend the dedicated client management team for their proactive and responsive support. Account managers are often described as knowledgeable... Clients commend the dedicated client management team for their proactive and responsive support. Account managers are often described as knowledgeable, invested in client success, and ready with insights and recommendations to drive business growth.
SRH Group is highly regarded for its modern, visually striking, and user-friendly website designs that enhance the guest booking experience. Clients n... SRH Group is highly regarded for its modern, visually striking, and user-friendly website designs that enhance the guest booking experience. Clients noted that these designs have significantly contributed to increased visibility and higher conversion rates. However, some clients expressed a need for more flexibility in customization and quicker turnaround times.
The extensive and in-depth reporting features provided by SRH Group are consistently praised, offering clear insights into performance trends and acti... The extensive and in-depth reporting features provided by SRH Group are consistently praised, offering clear insights into performance trends and actionable data that help hoteliers make informed decisions. Users find these reports crucial for strategy adjustments and performance tracking.
Where hoteliers push back
The voucher system implemented by SRH Group received mixed reviews. While appreciated for driving additional revenue, several users highlighted areas... The voucher system implemented by SRH Group received mixed reviews. While appreciated for driving additional revenue, several users highlighted areas for potential enhancements, including easier voucher management and partial redemptions.
While SRH Group's templates are generally praised for being visually appealing, some users find them restrictive and desire more options for customiza... While SRH Group's templates are generally praised for being visually appealing, some users find them restrictive and desire more options for customization to better reflect their unique brand identities.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
It depends on your requirements. SHR Website Design and STAAH InstantWebsite share many core Website Design features, but each has unique capabilities. SHR Website Design offers 81 verified integration partners, while STAAH InstantWebsite offers 54. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. SHR Website Design leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
SHR Website Design: No. STAAH InstantWebsite: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Website Design vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. SHR Group has an HT Score of 43 and STAAH has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor