The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
AXIS shines .
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 57 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, AXIS users most value its , while Counter users highlight user interface and usability, customer support, automated features. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| AXIS |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | AXIS |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #26 28 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | — | #46 4 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #32 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #31 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | AXIS |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #31 16 reviews |
| Luxury | — | #44 4 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | — | #43 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #32 5 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | AXIS |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #25 8 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #20 25 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #16 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #11 2 reviews |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) for your hotel involves balancing features, usability, support, and overall value. Both AXIS by AXIS and Counter by Counter aim to streamline operations, but they serve different hotel segments and come with distinct strengths. AXIS is a revenue management platform with advanced analytics, while Counter focuses on simplifying hostel management with an intuitive interface. Your decision hinges on which areas matter most to your hotel.
Given that Counter has a significantly higher review count (54) and recent reviews, it offers more current insights into user satisfaction. AXIS, with no recent reviews and a 0/5 overall rating, presents a less reliable choice despite its advanced revenue tools. How do these differences influence your choice?
AXIS and Counter both aim to improve hotel operations but tackle different problems. AXIS provides a comprehensive revenue management solution designed to optimize pricing and forecasting, making it ideal for hotels seeking data-driven profitability strategies. Counter, on the other hand, is built specifically for hostels, simplifying check-in, booking, and day-to-day management through a mobile-friendly interface.
AXIS’s lack of recent reviews and a 0/5 overall rating suggest it isn’t currently meeting user expectations, while Counter’s more recent and positive reviews highlight its growing stability and user satisfaction. Are you looking for a robust revenue tool or a straightforward hostel management system?
If your hotel operates at a larger scale with a focus on revenue optimization, AXIS’s advanced analytics, demand forecasting, and dynamic pricing features could be a fit—assuming it improves with user feedback. For small to medium hostels or properties prioritizing ease of management and guest experience, Counter’s intuitive, mobile-friendly platform has proven to simplify daily operations.
Counter’s extensive review base, with 54 reviews and recent feedback, indicates it’s a trusted choice among hostel operators, especially given a 91% likelihood to recommend. AXIS’s lack of recent reviews and zero overall ratings strongly suggest it’s not currently a competitive option. Which profile best fits your property?
Counter scores highly on ease of use, with a 4.6/5 rating, and reviews repeatedly praise its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and minimal staff training requirements. Hoteliers highlight its simple calendar management, automated features, and mobile capabilities, making remote operations straightforward.
AXIS, scoring 0/5 for ease of use, lacks recent reviews to evaluate its user interface. The absence of recent feedback suggests it may not be user-friendly or currently in active development. Edge: Counter.
Counter boasts 19 unique features, including a channel manager, payment processing, booking engine, housekeeping module, group booking, multi-currency, multi-lingual support, and guest CRM—covering almost every aspect of hostel management. AXIS offers no additional features beyond its core revenue analytics, limiting its scope.
Counter’s features directly cater to hostel needs, streamlining operations from reservations to financial management. AXIS’s revenue analytics, while valuable, lack the broader operational tools seen in Counter. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support ratings are nearly perfect at 4.96/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness, helpfulness, and dedicated support team, especially staff like Evelyn and Max. Hoteliers appreciate quick responses and proactive assistance, which is critical for operational stability.
AXIS has no recent support ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess current support quality. Its lack of recent feedback diminishes confidence in its customer service. Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including Stripe, Goki, Cloudbeds, and SiteMinder, providing robust options for payment, channel management, and access control. AXIS currently has no verified integrations listed, limiting its connectivity with other systems.
Counter’s diverse integrations support seamless operations across platforms, making it adaptable to existing tech stacks. AXIS’s absence of integrations suggests it may struggle to fit into a multi-platform environment. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s 4.73/5 rating from 54 reviews indicates strong satisfaction, especially among hostel operators, with many highlighting ease of use and support. Recent reviews reinforce its reliability and user-friendliness.
AXIS, with no recent reviews and a 0/5 rating, cannot be considered favorably. The lack of feedback signals it is not currently trusted or actively used by hoteliers. Edge: Counter.
Both products do not list specific pricing details and appear to have no free trials or clear financial models. Given the limited information, budget considerations should involve direct vendor inquiries.
Counter’s free, no-cost platform is a major advantage for hostels with tight budgets, while AXIS’s pricing remains undisclosed, likely indicating a premium or enterprise-level approach. Without concrete pricing data, the decision hinges on perceived value and support.
Not ideal if your property is small, needs straightforward booking management, or lacks technical staff—especially given AXIS’s current poor reviews.
Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced revenue analytics or dynamic pricing capabilities beyond basic management.
AXIS presents itself as a revenue-centric platform but currently lacks recent validation from users, making it a less reliable choice for most hotels now. Its core strength lies in analytics, suitable for larger properties with revenue management expertise.
Counter stands out as a user-rated, feature-rich PMS designed for hostels, with recent reviews confirming its ease of use, support, and integrations. It’s a practical choice for hostels and small hotels seeking operational simplicity.
Choose AXIS only if your hotel has sophisticated revenue management needs, and you are prepared to navigate an untested support environment. Opt for Counter if your priority is operational efficiency, user satisfaction, and active support for hostel management.
In summary, Counter’s more recent reviews and higher ratings make it the safer, more proven option for your property today. AXIS’s current position suggests it isn’t meeting hotelier expectations or needs at this moment.
According to HTR's product database, AXIS and Counter share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | AXIS |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. AXIS and Counter share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. AXIS offers 0 verified integration partners, while Counter offers 7. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
AXIS: No. Counter: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. AXIS has an HT Score of 0 and Counter has 17. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor