The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Ayenda shines .
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 57 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Ayenda users most value its , while Counter users highlight user interface and usability, customer support, automated features. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Ayenda |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Ayenda |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #26 28 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | — | #46 4 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #32 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #31 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Ayenda |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #31 16 reviews |
| Luxury | — | #44 4 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | — | #43 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #32 5 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Ayenda |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #25 8 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #20 25 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #16 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #11 2 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both Ayenda by Ayenda and Counter aim to serve this purpose, but they diverge significantly in maturity, features, and market presence. Ayenda remains largely unreviewed and untested by your industry peers, while Counter boasts over 50 recent reviews, high ratings, and a proven track record among hostels and small hotels. Does your property need a full-suite PMS or a streamlined hostel-specific platform?
While Ayenda’s lack of user reviews and recent data makes it hard to assess its real-world performance, Counter’s extensive feedback confirms its strengths. Should you prioritize a product validated by peer experiences or explore an untested platform? The decision hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and need for proven support.
Ayenda aims to provide a comprehensive property management solution, covering reservations, housekeeping, and inventory management, yet it has no reviews or user ratings to confirm its effectiveness. Counter, by contrast, is designed explicitly for hostels and small properties, with 54 recent reviews and a 4.73/5 overall rating, highlighting its user satisfaction.
Counter’s reviews praise its ease of use, quick onboarding, and responsive support, especially for hostel operators managing high turnover and multiple channels. On the other hand, Ayenda’s lack of review data makes it impossible to gauge its actual performance or user trust. Would you prefer a platform with proven user satisfaction or an untested solution?
Edge: Counter.
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich PMS with integrations like channel management, payments, and automated night audits, Counter is your best choice. Its wide feature set—19 unique functionalities, including a booking engine, revenue reports, and guest CRM—makes it suitable for hostels and boutique hotels seeking growth.
If your property is smaller or operates primarily within a niche market that doesn’t require extensive integrations, Ayenda might seem appealing. However, without reviews or proven support, it’s risky. Counter’s proven track record and recent positive feedback make it the safer, more reliable choice for most hotels.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s user interface scores a 4.6/5 based on recent reviews, with users describing it as intuitive, mobile-friendly, and quick to learn. Hoteliers highlight its straightforward calendar view, simple booking management, and helpful onboarding process, making staff adoption smooth.
Ayenda, on the other hand, has no reviews or ratings to assess usability. Its lack of user feedback leaves its ease of use unverified, raising questions about staff training and onboarding. Without concrete data, Counter’s well-documented usability advantages clearly stand out.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features, including channel management, online support, payment processing, guest CRM, multi-currency, and group bookings—features that are critical for small to mid-sized properties. In comparison, Ayenda provides no verified features or additional functionalities, leaving its offerings uncertain.
Counter’s features enable your team to automate tasks, manage multiple revenue streams, and improve operational oversight. The absence of comparable features in Ayenda means you’d be relying on unverified capabilities or potentially limited tools.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s recent reviews consistently praise its support team, rating it at 4.96/5, with users mentioning quick, helpful responses from staff like Evelyn and Max. This responsiveness is crucial when resolving operational issues swiftly, especially for small teams.
Ayenda has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess its support quality. The lack of peer feedback on Ayenda’s customer service suggests a significant risk for hotels that depend on reliable support.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including Stripe, Cloudbeds, SiteMinder, and Goki, offering features like online payments, channel management, and access control. These integrations enable your property to connect seamlessly with key platforms, streamlining operations.
Ayenda, with zero verified integrations, offers no confirmed partnerships or third-party support, limiting its capacity to connect with essential tools. For a hotel seeking flexibility and connectivity, Counter’s ecosystem provides a clear advantage.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s reviews reflect a high level of satisfaction, with an overall rating of 4.73/5 from 54 recent reviews, mostly from hostel and small property operators. Users appreciate its simplicity, support, and feature set, with some calling it the “best option for hostels.”
Ayenda has no reviews or recent feedback, making it impossible to gauge industry perception or user satisfaction. Given the extensive recent reviews for Counter, it’s evident that hoteliers trust and value this platform.
Edge: Counter.
Both Ayenda and Counter do not publicly disclose their pricing models. They are listed as no-trial, no-implementation fee services, indicating potential custom quotes based on your property’s size and needs.
Without transparent pricing data, your best move is to request quotes from both vendors. However, Counter’s features and proven support suggest it offers measurable value for its likely investment.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
In essence, the core difference between Ayenda and Counter is the level of validation and feature maturity. Ayenda remains an unreviewed, untested platform, while Counter boasts a proven record supported by dozens of recent reviews and extensive functionality tailored for hostels and small hotels.
If your hotel needs a reliable, feature-rich system with proven support, Counter clearly emerges as the better choice. Its high user ratings, broad integrations, and active customer support make it the safer investment for your property’s success.
Choose Counter if you want a platform with proven results, comprehensive features, and strong industry trust. Opt for Ayenda only if your hotel operates on a very basic level and you’re prepared to risk unverified support and functionality.
In conclusion, for most hotels seeking a dependable, well-supported PMS, Counter provides the certainty and capabilities your team needs to operate smoothly and grow.
According to HTR's product database, Ayenda and Counter share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Ayenda |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Ayenda and Counter share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Ayenda offers 0 verified integration partners, while Counter offers 7. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Ayenda: No. Counter: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Ayenda has an HT Score of 0 and Counter has 17. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor