The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 328 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Backing the packers shines .
Clock shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.8/5) , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Revenue management module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 328 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 328 |
After analyzing 328 verified reviews, Backing the packers users most value its , while Clock users highlight feature richness, operational efficiency, responsive support and regular updates. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Feature Richness
▾
|
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Responsive Support and Regular Updates
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use for Training
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Error Messages
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting Feature
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #11 117 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #7 157 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #17 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #11 5 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #8 165 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #11 80 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #8 62 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #9 27 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #17 30 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #3 228 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #11 13 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #17 2 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s daily operations, guest satisfaction, and overall revenue. Both Backing the packers and Clock aim to streamline hotel management but serve very different needs and hotel profiles, making your decision dependent on your hotel’s size, complexity, and feature requirements. How do these two systems compare in real-world use, and which one genuinely fits your property?
Backing the packers is a platform focused on customer feedback analysis, leveraging AI to distill review data into insights without offering traditional PMS features. In contrast, Clock PMS delivers a comprehensive, cloud-based operational system that covers reservations, rates, invoicing, and guest communication, directly impacting your daily operations.
The key divergence lies in their core offerings: Backing the packers does not serve as a PMS but enhances customer understanding through review analysis, while Clock PMS is an all-in-one management system designed for active hotel operations. Are you searching for a feedback tool or a full operational platform? The answer will guide your choice.
If your hotel needs a platform to analyze guest reviews and extract actionable insights, Backing the packers is the clear choice, especially since it’s a feedback-focused AI tool. However, if your hotel requires a full-featured PMS that manages reservations, rates, invoicing, and guest engagement, Clock PMS is the more suitable option, given its extensive suite of functionalities.
For small, independent hotels or properties emphasizing guest satisfaction analytics, Backing the packers could complement your existing systems. If you operate a medium or large property with complex operations and need a holistic management platform, Clock PMS is the more fitting choice.
Backing the packers offers a simple interface optimized for review analysis, with a focus on summarization and insights, but it is not designed for operational management, so usability relates mainly to review navigation. The ease of onboarding isn’t a primary feature, and there’s limited direct user feedback on UI.
Clock PMS boasts a highly rated user interface (4.78/5) praised for its intuitiveness and speed, especially for staff training and daily tasks. Its onboarding process scores 4.71/5, and users consistently mention how the system reduces training time and simplifies operations, even during busy periods.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Backing the packers offers no standalone features, as it focuses solely on review analysis and AI-driven insights. Meanwhile, Clock PMS provides 58 features, including payment processing, booking engine, channel management, revenue management, guest profiles, online check-in, and more.
Clock’s extensive capabilities make it a one-stop solution for operational management, whereas Backing the packers’s value lies in review insights—complementing rather than replacing PMS functions. For comprehensive hotel management, Clock’s feature set clearly outperforms.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Backing the packers offers no available support ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess their support quality. Conversely, Clock PMS has a support rating of 4.75/5, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses and responsive updates.
Users appreciate Clock’s proactive customer service, with comments like “The support team is very responsive,” and note regular system improvements. Given the importance of support in operational software, Clock’s support is the stronger choice.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Backing the packers has no verified integrations listed, indicating limited or no direct third-party system connectivity. Clock PMS, however, integrates with 111 verified partners, including Curacity, Hotel Investor Apps, and RevControl, across various categories.
This broad integration ecosystem allows Clock users to connect seamlessly with revenue, booking, and guest engagement tools, making it a more flexible and scalable platform. For hotels seeking extensive integration options, Clock is the clear leader.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Backing the packers has no review ratings or recent review activity, reflecting very limited user feedback. Clock PMS, on the other hand, boasts a 4.8/5 overall rating from 251 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its usability and comprehensive features.
Hotels of all sizes, especially those in boutique or city-center segments, rate Clock highly (average 4.84/5), praising its time savings and operational improvements. The volume and recency of reviews favor Clock as the more trusted product.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Backing the packers does not list any pricing details, suggesting it may be a bespoke or analytics-only service without a standard fee. Clock PMS costs $600 per month, with no additional connection or setup fees, offering a transparent subscription model.
While pricing transparency favors Clock, the choice depends on whether you need a standalone review analysis tool or a full PMS. For a comprehensive hotel management solution, the investment in Clock is justified by its extensive features and support.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The fundamental difference is that Clock PMS offers a complete, operational management platform, while Backing the packers is a review analysis tool that can complement existing systems. If your hotel needs a full management system to handle reservations, invoicing, and guest communication, Clock is the clear choice due to its extensive features and high user ratings.
Choose Clock PMS if you want a scalable, integrated solution that covers all operational bases, especially for properties with complex workflows. On the other hand, if your focus is on understanding and improving your guest reviews, Backing the packers can add value but should be paired with a dedicated PMS.
For medium to large hotels or properties seeking operational efficiency and automation, Clock PMS’s broad feature set, high support standards, and extensive integrations make it the better fit. Smaller hotels or boutique properties primarily interested in reputation management should consider Backing the packers as an auxiliary tool.
In summary, Clock PMS is the more complete, well-reviewed platform for active hotel management, while Backing the packers serves a niche role focused on review insights, lacking operational functions but useful for reputation-focused properties. Your choice hinges on whether you need a full operational system or a review analysis supplement.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Backing the packers |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Backing the packers and Clock PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 46 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 6 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
What hoteliers love
Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of feat... Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of features overwhelming and suggest improved organization.
The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contribut... The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contributing to a smoother experience for both staff and guests.
Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliabilit... Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliability and relevance to user needs.
Where hoteliers push back
Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the erro... Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the error message to the problem would improve user experience.
While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful... While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful capabilities.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Backing the packers and Clock PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Backing the packers offers 0 verified integration partners, while Clock PMS offers 111. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Clock PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Backing the packers: No. Clock PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Backing the packers has an HT Score of 0 and Clock has 84. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor