The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 887 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Backing the packers shines .
Mews shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Side-by-side ratings based on 887 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 887 |
After analyzing 887 verified reviews, Backing the packers users most value its , while Mews users highlight ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding and Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 329 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 397 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 45 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #3 49 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #5 220 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #2 170 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 130 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #8 106 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #10 17 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #28 8 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can transform your hotel operations, guest experience, and revenue. When comparing Backing the packers and Mews PMS, it’s clear that the latter’s extensive feature set, user reviews, and market presence make it the more compelling choice. Both aim to streamline management, but only one has consistently proven its effectiveness across diverse hotel types and sizes.
Your decision hinges on what your hotel needs most: a flexible, scalable platform with proven support and integrations, or a less established system with limited reviews and features. Which will better serve your current and future operational goals?
Backing the packers is marketed as a customer feedback analysis platform that leverages AI to turn review data into insights. It ostensibly aims to improve customer satisfaction and operational decisions but offers no real-world user reviews or verified case studies, making its effectiveness difficult to validate.
In contrast, Mews PMS has over 750 verified reviews, with the majority recent—98 reviews within the last six months—indicating active, ongoing customer engagement. Mews’ overall rating of 4.62/5 and NPS score of 9.12/5 demonstrate high customer satisfaction, especially among hotelier users who emphasize its ease of use, automation, and extensive integrations.
While Backing the packers claims to analyze reviews with AI, it lacks the tangible, real-world hotel-specific features and proven track record that make Mews PMS a trusted operational tool. Do you want a platform backed by extensive user feedback and proven results or an untested AI review analysis tool?
If your hotel needs a robust, full-featured PMS that supports daily operations, revenue management, guest experience, and integrations, go with Mews. It’s proven to maximize efficiency in boutique, city-center, and larger hotels, with features like online check-in, PMS & POS integration, and a marketplace of over 1,000 third-party apps.
If you’re primarily looking for a platform to analyze customer reviews and gather insights for marketing or service improvements, Backing the packers might be relevant—though it currently lacks the hotel-specific features and proven operational impact that Mews provides.
For hoteliers aiming for operational excellence, scalability, and guest satisfaction, Mews clearly outperforms Backing the packers based on recent reviews and extensive market presence.
Mews scores an impressive 4.7/5 for ease of use, supported by consistent positive feedback about its modern, intuitive UI and onboarding process. Users highlight how quickly new staff can learn the system, with some noting that onboarding takes around four days on average.
Backing the packers, with no reviews or established user feedback, offers no reliable data on usability. Its vague description of a "visual allure" doesn’t translate into confirmed ease of implementation or daily operation.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts over 59 unique features tailored for hotel management—ranging from multi-lingual, multi-currency support, revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, online check-in, and automated housekeeping, to more advanced tools like digital registration, real-time reporting, and integrated payment solutions.
Backing the packers offers no verifiable features or integrations specific to hotel management, nor does it demonstrate any comprehensive toolset. Its value proposition appears limited to review analysis, not operational management.
Edge: Mews.
Mews has a customer support rating of 4.27/5, with reviews praising its responsive, knowledgeable support team and smooth onboarding processes. Customers comment: “The support team sets new standards,” and “Mews is very user-friendly, making everything much easier.”
Backing the packers provides no review data or testimonials on customer support. Given the lack of evidence, we cannot assume it offers comparable service levels.
Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including critical tools like channel managers, payment processors, revenue management, and housekeeping modules. Its open API and marketplace enable customization and seamless connectivity across hotel systems.
Backing the packers has zero verified integrations, limiting its utility as an operational platform. It’s not a practical choice for hotels seeking comprehensive, connected management solutions.
Edge: Mews.
Mews has a 4.64/5 average review score from 679 hotelier reviews, with high marks from boutique, independent, and branded hotels. Recent reviews praise its simplicity, automation, and ability to boost operational efficiency—drivers of guest satisfaction and revenue.
Backing the packers has no verified reviews or ratings. Without user feedback, it’s impossible to evaluate its effectiveness or hotel satisfaction.
Edge: Mews.
Backing the packers does not list a pricing model, indicating it may be a niche or experimental product without transparent costs. Mews charges a $900 monthly fee, with no freemium or tiered options listed, suggesting a premium, enterprise-level platform.
For hotels seeking predictable, value-driven pricing aligned with operational scale, Mews provides clarity, while Backing the packers’ costs remain unclear.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Mews is a cloud-native PMS designed to meet the demands of modern hotels, with a proven track record, extensive features, and high user satisfaction. It excels in automating operations, enhancing guest experiences, and integrating with a broad ecosystem.
Choose Mews if your hotel needs a scalable, reliable, and feature-rich management system that supports growth and operational excellence. Its recent reviews and high ratings demonstrate its effectiveness in diverse hotel environments.
Backing the packers offers a niche AI review analysis tool but lacks the operational features, integrations, and proven support that make Mews the smarter, more comprehensive choice for hotels. For long-term success, hotel managers should prioritize platforms with extensive hotel-specific capabilities and positive, recent user feedback.
In conclusion, if you’re ready to upgrade your property’s management and guest experience, Mews PMS is the clear choice, with a track record of satisfied hoteliers and ongoing innovation. The decision isn’t close: Mews’ recent reviews, broad features, and active support make it the platform to trust for your hotel’s future.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Backing the packers |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Backing the packers and Mews PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 47 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
What hoteliers love
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Where hoteliers push back
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting featu... While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting features. Users express the desire for more granular data insights, particularly in reservations and revenue analysis.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Backing the packers and Mews PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Backing the packers offers 0 verified integration partners, while Mews PMS offers 336. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Mews PMS leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Backing the packers: No. Mews PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Backing the packers has an HT Score of 0 and Mews has 99. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor