The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Backing the packers shines .
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 47 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, Backing the packers users most value its , while Infor users highlight ease of use, reporting, integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #44 8 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #25 24 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #19 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #24 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #28 24 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #23 26 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #29 8 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #31 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #22 20 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #24 17 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #28 1 reviews |
Your hotel’s management system needs to streamline operations and improve guest experiences. Both "Backing the packers" and "Informat HMS" aim to solve these challenges but approach them differently. "Backing the packers" offers a data-driven platform focused on review analysis, while "Infor HMS" provides a comprehensive property management solution. Which of these aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
The key question is whether your team values AI-powered insights from guest feedback or a robust, operationally focused PMS. Do you want a platform that helps you understand customer sentiment or one that automates reservations, housekeeping, and revenue management?
"Backing the packers" is an AI-driven review analysis platform designed to distill guest feedback into actionable insights. It excels at helping your team understand customer sentiment through natural language processing, but it doesn’t handle core operational functions like reservations or housekeeping. Its focus is on customer experience improvements based on review data.
"Infor HMS" is a full-fledged hotel property management system built to handle operational workflows, including reservations, housekeeping, billing, and revenue management. It offers over 20 features such as guest profiles, online support, and automated night audits, making it ideal for streamlining daily hotel operations.
Both products aim to improve hotel performance but address different pain points. Are you looking to understand what your guests really think or to run your hotel more efficiently? That choice will define which product fits your needs best.
If your hotel needs to improve operational efficiency, automate routine tasks, and manage guest data across multiple channels, "Infor HMS" is the obvious choice. It offers a broad suite of features, including guest profiles, online support, and revenue modules, with a high overall rating of 4.04/5 from 46 recent reviews.
Conversely, if your focus is on analyzing guest reviews and extracting insights to enhance customer satisfaction, "Backing the packers" may seem appealing. However, with zero reviews and a score of 0/5, it lacks recent user feedback and demonstrated effectiveness. For hotels seeking proven operational tools, "Infor HMS" offers a clear advantage.
Given the more recent reviews and higher ratings, "Infor HMS" is the recommended solution for most hotel operators. Its extensive feature set and active user base make it a safer, more reliable choice.
"Backing the packers" scores a 0/5 for ease of use, with no reviews in the last six months—a sign of very limited recent feedback and unclear user experience. Its primary function is AI-driven review analysis, so usability may not be its strong point, especially without concrete user experiences.
"Infor HMS" scores 3.88/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews emphasizing its navigability and straightforward interface. Users appreciate the short onboarding process and mobile capabilities, though some mention that the UI could be more modern.
Edge: Infor HMS.
"Backing the packers" has no unique features listed, focusing solely on review analysis and customer sentiment extraction. Its AI capabilities for summarizing reviews and generating actionable insights are its main selling points, but it lacks operational modules.
"Infor HMS" offers 20 features exclusive to its platform, including a housekeeping module, online support, guest profiles, multi-lingual interface, cloud hosting, payment processing, revenue management, and automated night audit. These features directly impact daily hotel operations and revenue.
Edge: Infor HMS.
"Backing the packers" has no available support ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge support quality. Its niche focus on review analysis suggests minimal direct customer support needs.
"Infor HMS" boasts a 4.04/5 support rating based on recent reviews. Hoteliers highlight the responsiveness and professionalism of their support team, describing interactions as "prompt" and "helpful," especially critical during updates or troubleshooting.
Edge: Infor HMS.
"Backing the packers" has no verified integrations, indicating it is primarily a standalone review analysis platform.
"Infor HMS" is integrated with 113 verified partners, including booking engines like Booking.com, Expedia, and HRS, as well as revenue tools like Fairmas and CRM systems like Customer Alliance. This extensive integration ecosystem simplifies operational workflows and data consistency.
Edge: Infor HMS.
"Backing the packers" has zero reviews, so there’s no recent hotel feedback to consider. Its lack of reviews suggests it’s untested or not widely adopted.
"Infor HMS" has 46 recent reviews with a 4.04/5 overall rating, and users from various segments like independent hotels and branded properties rate it highly. Hotels particularly value its operational features and support responsiveness.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Both products do not list detailed pricing models or fees. "Backing the packers" appears to operate on a custom or undefined pricing structure, likely due to its niche focus.
"Infor HMS" also does not specify costs but typically offers a subscription-based model, with prices varying based on the number of rooms and modules chosen. For precise costs, direct inquiry is necessary.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
"Backing the packers" is designed for review analysis and sentiment insight, but it lacks recent reviews and proven operational capabilities. Its focus is narrow, making it unsuitable as a core management system.
"Infor HMS" is a comprehensive, cloud-based property management system with a solid user base, high ratings, and extensive integrations. It streamlines daily operations, supports revenue growth, and adapts to complex hotel needs.
If your goal is to run your hotel smoothly and improve guest experiences through operational excellence, "Infor HMS" is the clear choice. For insight-driven reputation management, review analysis platforms like Backing the packers" could complement your existing systems but may not replace a PMS.
Final verdict: For most hotels needing a practical, scalable, and well-supported PMS, "Infor HMS" is the safer, more effective option. If guest feedback analysis is your priority, consider integrating a review platform alongside your PMS rather than relying solely on "Backing the packers."
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Backing the packers |
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Backing the packers and Infor HMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Backing the packers and Infor HMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Backing the packers offers 0 verified integration partners, while Infor HMS offers 113. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Backing the packers: No. Infor HMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Backing the packers has an HT Score of 0 and Infor has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor