The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 97 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Blastness shines in onboarding , with exclusive features like Reporting Dashboard.
DJUBO shines , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest Feedback Management.
Side-by-side ratings based on 97 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 77 | 20 |
After analyzing 97 verified reviews, Blastness users most value its professional assistance and support, data accessibility and flexibility, seamless system integration, while DJUBO users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Professional Assistance and Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Data Accessibility and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless System Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Revenue Management Tools
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Interface Intuitiveness Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Reservations Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #1 29 reviews | #7 5 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 42 reviews | #16 0 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #13 0 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #12 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 28 reviews | #10 3 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 32 reviews | #11 2 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 19 reviews | #13 0 reviews |
| Extended Stay | #5 4 reviews | #10 0 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #12 0 reviews | #13 0 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #1 76 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #8 0 reviews | #2 5 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #11 0 reviews |
Choosing between Blastness CRS and Djubo requires clear understanding of how each addresses your hotel’s needs. Both products aim to streamline reservation management and boost revenue, but their capabilities, market presence, and user feedback diverge significantly. Blastness offers a tailored solution predominantly for independent hotels with a focus on revenue management, while Djubo presents an all-in-one platform suited for a range of hotel types but with fewer recent reviews.
Your choice hinges on whether you prioritize more recent user feedback and a broader integration network or specialized revenue tools and an intuitive user interface. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s operational goals?
Blastness and Djubo serve the fundamental purpose of reservation management but differ vastly in their approach and market focus. Blastness excels in revenue management and digital marketing tools for independent hotels, with a high HTR Score of 100 based on 72 reviews and recent positive feedback. Djubo, despite having a higher overall user rating of 5/5 from 19 reviews, has a lower HTR Score of 0, indicating less recent and less comprehensive feedback.
Blastness is praised for its user-friendly revenue systems and marketing capabilities, whereas Djubo is lauded for its integrated platform and multi-module approach. The real question is: do you need a dedicated revenue management system, or a comprehensive management suite?
If your hotel needs advanced revenue management and direct booking optimization, Blastness provides a specialized CRS designed for independent hotels. Its core strengths include real-time rate control, marketing tools, and detailed reporting — ideal for boutique and city-center hotels focused on direct bookings. Conversely, Djubo suits hotels seeking an all-in-one platform that combines PMS, channel management, POS, and revenue functions, especially if managing multiple properties or requiring a unified dashboard.
For small, independent properties aiming to maximize revenue and control, Blastness’s dedicated tools are more suitable. If your hotel operates across multiple locations with diverse operational needs, Djubo’s modular, integrated system offers flexibility.
Blastness scores a 4.89/5 for ease of use based on ongoing customer feedback, with reviewers frequently citing its intuitive revenue management and booking engine. Its onboarding process is rated at 4.94/5, reflecting a straightforward setup and strong support, though some users suggest interface improvements for navigation.
Djubo also earns high marks, with a 4.74/5 ease-of-use score. Users appreciate its clean interface and the professionalism of the training, but note that POS inaccuracies and feature gaps may hinder daily operations. Edge: Blastness.
Blastness offers 14 shared features and 4 unique ones, including geotargeted pricing, content management, TMC management, and a reporting dashboard. These are tailored for revenue optimization and marketing, giving it an edge for independent hotels focused on direct booking growth.
Djubo provides 16 unique features like a comprehensive channel manager, multi-currency, PMS, POS, group booking engine, and guest feedback management. Its extensive module set supports larger operations with diverse needs. Edge: Djubo.
Blastness’s support scores a 4.9/5, with reviews highlighting professional, responsive assistance and ongoing support that keeps the system running smoothly. Users mention immediate responses to issues and helpful training, making support a key strength.
Djubo’s support scores 4.61/5, with feedback pointing to friendly service but some inconsistency in issue resolution, especially around feature gaps and reporting. Recent reviews suggest support is generally good but less responsive compared to Blastness. Edge: Blastness.
Blastness boasts 15 verified integrations, including Oracle Hospitality, Hotelcube, and Vertical Booking, covering a broad range of distribution and management tools. Djubo has only 3 verified partners, with shared integrations being minimal, mainly TripAdvisor.
If extensive third-party integrations are critical for your hotel, Blastness’s larger network offers more flexibility and options. Edge: Blastness.
Blastness’s reviews are more recent, with 15 new reviews in the last 6 months, contributing to its high rating and a 99% likelihood to recommend. Hotel segments like luxury and city-center hotels frequently praise its revenue tools and support.
Djubo’s reviews, while positive, are older and fewer, with a 97% recommendation rate. Boutique hotels and resorts in its user base value its all-in-one approach but report less recent system updates.
Given the recency and volume of feedback, Blastness’s ratings are more representative of current performance. Edge: Blastness.
Blastness charges a flat rate of $600 per month without trial options. Its straightforward pricing emphasizes transparency and predictability for independent hotels investing in revenue-focused tools.
Djubo does not publicly disclose pricing, but based on industry context, it typically offers tiered packages without a fixed monthly fee, focusing on modular solutions. Exact costs vary depending on modules selected, which can make direct comparison difficult.
Hotels that benefit most from Blastness:
Not ideal if:
Hotels suited for Djubo:
Not ideal if:
Blastness is a niche CRS tailored for independent hotels seeking to maximize revenue through digital marketing and targeted management tools. Its recent reviews, high ratings, and extensive integration network make it a strong choice for properties focusing on direct bookings and revenue control.
Djubo offers a wide-ranging, modular platform suitable for multi-property operations that need integrated PMS, channel management, POS, and other management functions. Its comprehensive features are ideal if your hotel requires an all-in-one solution, despite fewer recent reviews and a narrower integration network.
If your primary goal is revenue optimization and direct bookings, Blastness’s recent performance and high user approval make it the better choice. For larger, multi-faceted operations needing broad management tools, Djubo’s integrated platform is more appropriate.
Final call: For most independent hotels prioritizing revenue and recent support, Blastness edges out Djubo. However, if your hotel needs a broad, multi-module platform, Djubo remains a viable option.
According to HTR's product database, Blastness CRS and Djubo (CRS) share 14 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Content management | ||
| Geotargeted pricing module | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Point of Sale | ||
| Property Management System | ||
| Reporting Dashboard | ||
| TMC Management |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"The constant evolution of tools such as Business Intelligence and RMS, which my team and I use on a daily basis, has led to very interesting results."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Reviews commend the professional and responsive assistance offered by Blastness, highlighting the importance of ongoing training and immediate respons... Reviews commend the professional and responsive assistance offered by Blastness, highlighting the importance of ongoing training and immediate responses to changes in the market.
Users appreciate the easy access to comprehensive data and the flexibility in manipulating pricing and settings, beneficial for strategic planning and... Users appreciate the easy access to comprehensive data and the flexibility in manipulating pricing and settings, beneficial for strategic planning and adjustments.
Users report that Blastness integrates well with existing systems, resulting in a cohesive workflow without technical hitches or disruptions, thus enh... Users report that Blastness integrates well with existing systems, resulting in a cohesive workflow without technical hitches or disruptions, thus enhancing daily operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
While generally well-received, some users note that specific sections of the Blastness interface could be more intuitive, which would enhance navigati... While generally well-received, some users note that specific sections of the Blastness interface could be more intuitive, which would enhance navigation and user experience.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Blastness CRS and Djubo (CRS) share many core Hotel Reservations Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Blastness CRS offers 15 verified integration partners, while Djubo (CRS) offers 3. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Blastness CRS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Blastness CRS: No. Djubo (CRS): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Reservations Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Blastness has an HT Score of 100 and DJUBO has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor