The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 79 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Blastness shines when it comes to professional assistance and support , with exclusive features like Mobile App and Reporting Dashboard.
Phobs shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 79 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 77 | 2 |
After analyzing 79 verified reviews, Blastness users most value its professional assistance and support, data accessibility and flexibility, seamless system integration, while Phobs users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Professional Assistance and Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Data Accessibility and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless System Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Revenue Management Tools
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Interface Intuitiveness Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Reservations Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #1 29 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 42 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #13 0 reviews | #11 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 28 reviews | #15 1 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 32 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 19 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #5 4 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #12 0 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 76 reviews | #10 1 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #8 0 reviews | — |
Choosing between Blastness CRS and Phobs hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. While both aim to streamline operations and boost revenue, their core functionalities and target markets differ significantly. Blastness offers a comprehensive reservation and revenue management system tailored for independent hotels seeking control and growth, whereas Phobs is more of a property management platform focusing on daily operations and guest management. Which aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
Blastness CRS, with its 72 reviews and a perfect 100/100 HTR Score, outperforms Phobs, which has only 2 reviews and a 0/100 score. Its recent reviews highlight a strong user base in North America and Europe, while Phobs remains largely unreviewed outside Europe. For hoteliers seeking a feature-rich, well-supported reservation system, Blastness is the clear choice.
Blastness CRS and Phobs serve different hotel management functions. Blastness is a full-fledged reservation system that centralizes rate management, channel distribution, and revenue optimization, making it ideal for hotels looking to maximize direct bookings and control pricing strategies. Phobs, by contrast, is mainly a property management system that handles reservations, check-ins, billing, and daily operational tasks.
Blastness’s strength lies in its ability to connect with numerous partners and channels—15 verified integrations, including Duetto, Oracle Hospitality, and vertical booking—compared to Phobs’s single verified partner. This makes Blastness more suitable for hotels that rely heavily on OTA and GDS distribution. Conversely, if your hotel’s focus is on daily property management, housekeeping, and guest service, Phobs might seem appealing, but its minimal review data makes it a less reliable choice at this stage.
Both products aim to improve efficiency and revenue, but Blastness’s extensive feature set and recent positive reviews make it the more proven platform. Are you ready to handle a more complex system for greater control and revenue growth?
If your hotel needs a robust reservation management platform with advanced revenue tools, choose Blastness. It’s best for independent hotels, resorts, and boutique properties that want to boost direct bookings, manage multiple properties, and access detailed analytics. With a $600/month starting price, it offers numerous specialized features like dynamic pricing, availability management, and a mobile app for staff.
If your hotel’s priority is daily operations—guest check-in, billing, housekeeping, and simple reservation tracking—Phobs might seem suitable. However, given its limited reviews and lack of detailed feature data, it’s better suited for small properties in Europe seeking basic management tools rather than a comprehensive solution.
For hoteliers seeking a proven, full-scale reservation and revenue system backed by recent positive reviews, Blastness is the recommended choice. Are you prepared to invest in a system proven to drive revenue and simplify complex distribution?
Blastness scores 4.89/5 for ease of use, with a highly positive review count of 72, indicating strong user satisfaction. Reviewers highlight an intuitive booking engine, reliable integrations, and a well-designed interface, although some note that certain sections could be more streamlined.
Phobs scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, with only 2 recent reviews, both praising its user-friendly interface and straightforward daily operations. However, the very limited review data makes it harder to assess its long-term usability confidently.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness offers 18 exclusive features, including RMS connectivity, PMS integration, metasearch support, geotargeted pricing, dynamic pricing, and a mobile app. Its features are tailored to revenue management, multi-property control, and distribution, giving it a clear edge for hotels looking for a comprehensive system.
Phobs lacks detailed feature data but appears to focus on core property management functions such as reservations, billing, and housekeeping. Its minimal feature set and lack of specialized tools suggest it’s less capable for revenue optimization but may suit smaller hotels with simpler needs.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness’s support scores 4.9/5, with reviews emphasizing rapid, knowledgeable, and personalized assistance. Hoteliers appreciate the ongoing training and responsiveness, which have been key in helping them maximize the system's potential.
Phobs also scores a perfect 5/5 for support, with reviews highlighting “fast, reliable customer support” and “personalized help.” However, with only 2 reviews, its support reputation isn't as robust or well-verified as Blastness’s.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness boasts 15 verified partners, including major players like Duetto and Oracle Hospitality. Its extensive integration options allow for a flexible tech stack, connecting revenue management, channel distribution, and PMS systems.
Phobs has just one verified partner, limiting its integration capabilities. While it may connect with some basic tools, its restricted partner network hampers scalability and advanced automation.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness’s 72 reviews with a 4.94/5 NPS score reveal high satisfaction, particularly among independent and boutique hotels. Recent reviews praise its reliability, user-friendly features, and support, solidifying its reputation as a trusted system.
Phobs, with only 2 reviews and a 10/10 NPS score, is less proven. The limited data and lack of recent feedback make it difficult to determine overall user satisfaction for larger or more complex properties.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness charges a flat $600/month fee, with no free trial or tiered options. This includes access to all core features and support, making it transparent for budgeting.
Phobs does not disclose specific pricing details or subscription models, indicating it may be customized or regionally priced. Without clear pricing, it’s harder to evaluate value compared to Blastness’s straightforward rate.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if you seek a lightweight, straightforward PMS without advanced revenue features.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if you require advanced analytics, dynamic pricing, or multi-property management.
Blastness delivers a full-featured reservation and revenue management system, supported by a large user base and recent positive reviews. Its extensive integrations, detailed analytics, and proven support set it apart for independent and boutique hotels seeking growth.
Phobs, while easy to use and well-rated by its few users, mainly targets small properties with basic operational needs. Its limited review data and feature set make it a less attractive choice for hotels aiming to expand or optimize revenue.
Choose Blastness if you want a proven, feature-rich platform that enhances your revenue, simplifies distribution, and scales with your hotel. Opt for Phobs only if your needs are minimal, and your focus is on daily operations within a small hotel context.
According to HTR's product database, Blastness CRS and Phobs share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Dynamic Pricing | ||
| Geotargeted pricing module | ||
| Metasearch connectivity | ||
| PMS connectivity | ||
| RMS connectivity | ||
| Support for Weekly & Monthly Rates |
Showing top differences. 6 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"The constant evolution of tools such as Business Intelligence and RMS, which my team and I use on a daily basis, has led to very interesting results."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Reviews commend the professional and responsive assistance offered by Blastness, highlighting the importance of ongoing training and immediate respons... Reviews commend the professional and responsive assistance offered by Blastness, highlighting the importance of ongoing training and immediate responses to changes in the market.
Users appreciate the easy access to comprehensive data and the flexibility in manipulating pricing and settings, beneficial for strategic planning and... Users appreciate the easy access to comprehensive data and the flexibility in manipulating pricing and settings, beneficial for strategic planning and adjustments.
Users report that Blastness integrates well with existing systems, resulting in a cohesive workflow without technical hitches or disruptions, thus enh... Users report that Blastness integrates well with existing systems, resulting in a cohesive workflow without technical hitches or disruptions, thus enhancing daily operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
While generally well-received, some users note that specific sections of the Blastness interface could be more intuitive, which would enhance navigati... While generally well-received, some users note that specific sections of the Blastness interface could be more intuitive, which would enhance navigation and user experience.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
It depends on your requirements. Blastness CRS and Phobs share many core Hotel Reservations Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Blastness CRS offers 15 verified integration partners, while Phobs offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Phobs leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.9/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Blastness CRS: No. Phobs: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Reservations Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Blastness has an HT Score of 100 and Phobs has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor