The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 49 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Bnovo (Биново) shines in ROI , with exclusive features like Channel Manager and Integrated CRS.
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Mobile App.
Side-by-side ratings based on 49 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 2 | 47 |
After analyzing 49 verified reviews, Bnovo (Биново) users most value its , while Infor users highlight ease of use, reporting, integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #55 1 reviews | #44 8 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #25 24 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #51 0 reviews | #19 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #24 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #70 1 reviews | #28 24 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #70 0 reviews | #23 26 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #29 8 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #31 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #22 20 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #39 2 reviews | #24 17 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #28 1 reviews |
Choosing between Bnovo PMS by Bnovo and Infor HMS involves assessing critical aspects of property management software that impact your hotel’s operations, guest experiences, and ROI. Both systems aim to streamline operations, but they diverge significantly in features, support, and market presence. Your decision hinges on the specific needs of your property and the level of support you require.
Bnovo offers an affordable, cloud-based solution with core functionalities tailored for small to mid-sized hotels, motels, and apartments. Infor, on the other hand, provides a more scalable, feature-rich platform favored by larger, multi-property operations. Which approach aligns better with your hotel’s size and growth plans?
Both Bnovo PMS and Infor HMS aim to improve operational efficiency and guest management, but they differ in maturity and scope. Bnovo, with only 2 reviews, has a limited recent review base, making its overall rating of 2.25/5 less reliable. Its strengths lie in channel connections and capacity management, but frequent crashes and poor support hinder its effectiveness.
Infor boasts a much higher review count—46 reviews—and a recent rating of 4.04/5, reflecting broader user satisfaction. It offers extensive customization, automation, and integration options, making it suitable for hotels seeking advanced control. Are you prioritizing a mature system with proven support, or a more budget-friendly, basic solution?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-packed PMS capable of handling complex operations and multi-property management, Infor is the clear choice. Its comprehensive feature set, including guest profiles, mobile apps, and revenue tracking, suits larger, more sophisticated properties or portfolios.
If your hotel requires a straightforward, low-cost system with essential connectivity and capacity management—especially for motels or villas—Bnovo may suffice. It’s more suitable for smaller, independently operated properties that need quick implementation and basic automation.
In short, choose Infor for extensive features and scalability; lean toward Bnovo if budget and simplicity are your priorities. The decision depends on your property’s complexity and growth aspirations.
Bnovo’s ease of use is rated at 3/5, with reviewers citing a disorganized mobile interface and technical support that often doesn’t meet expectations. Its interface has been described as “disgusting,” and users report crashing servers and buggy performance, which complicate daily tasks.
Infor scores higher at 3.88/5, praised for its intuitive navigation, quick onboarding, and user-friendly design. Support responsiveness and detailed training help staff adopt the system faster, despite some complaints about aesthetic simplicity.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Bnovo’s unique features include a channel manager, integrated CRS, booking engine, and EPoS—tools critical for sales and operations—but it only offers four features exclusive to it. Its core package covers essential PMS functions, but lacks advanced modules.
Infor offers five unique features, notably guest profiles, a mobile app, on-premise deployment options, ancillary revenue tracking, and automated night audits—adding depth to operational control. With 15 shared features, Infor’s broader suite stands out for its automation and customization capabilities.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Bnovo’s support ratings are notably low at 1.25/5, with reviews describing support as “very bad,” and citing unresolved bugs and poor responsiveness. Customers complain about slow fixes and a lack of technical assistance that truly addresses issues.
In contrast, Infor scores 4.04/5, with reviews emphasizing the support team’s professionalism, prompt responses, and helpful onboarding. Users appreciate guidance during setup and ongoing issues, which are managed efficiently.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Bnovo connects with 2 verified partners, including compare.me and Aiosell Technologies, limiting its integration scope. Infor, however, boasts a robust ecosystem with 113 verified partners, including major OTAs and industry-specific solutions like Priority Software and Birchstreet.
The broader integration capacity of Infor allows hotels to unify operational systems, revenue management, and guest services effectively. This extensive network enhances workflow automation and data consistency.
Edge: Infor HMS.
With just 2 reviews, Bnovo’s ratings are unreliable; it scores 2.25/5, with users citing poor support and stability issues. Its limited review base makes it difficult to gauge overall satisfaction.
Infor, with 46 reviews and a recent rating of 4.04/5, is rated higher across hotel segments. Independent hotels rate it at 2.5/5, but larger properties, like branded and boutique hotels, rate it between 4.18/5 and 4.5/5, reflecting strong satisfaction among mid to large-sized hotels.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Both systems do not publicly disclose specific pricing details, indicating a tailored pricing approach based on hotel size and requirements. Typically, these platforms are priced on a subscription basis, but Bnovo’s lack of a trial or clear fee structure suggests a less transparent model.
Infor’s pricing is also not listed, but its enterprise-level features usually come with higher costs, often justified by the broader functionality and support. For precise quotes, direct vendor contact is necessary.
The core difference is that Bnovo PMS is a basic, affordable tool primarily suited for small properties, while Infor HMS is a comprehensive, scalable platform tailored for larger, more sophisticated hotels. Bnovo’s limited reviews and support issues suggest caution, especially for properties needing reliability.
Choose Bnovo if your hotel values low cost, quick setup, and essential features without complex integrations. Opt for Infor if operational depth, automation, and support are critical, and your hotel aims for growth and multi-property management.
In conclusion, if you prioritize a system backed by a broad user base, recent positive reviews, and extensive features, Infor HMS clearly leads the field. However, if your hotel operates on a tight budget with straightforward needs, Bnovo may be worth a closer look—yet beware of the support and stability concerns.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Bnovo PMS and Infor HMS share 15 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Automated night audit | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| On premise |
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Bnovo PMS and Infor HMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Bnovo PMS offers 2 verified integration partners, while Infor HMS offers 113. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 3.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Bnovo PMS: No. Infor HMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Bnovo (Биново) has an HT Score of 0 and Infor has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor