The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 110 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Bnovo (Биново) shines in ROI , with exclusive features like Channel Manager and EPoS.
Planet shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like On premise and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 110 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 2 | 108 |
After analyzing 110 verified reviews, Bnovo (Биново) users most value its , while Planet users highlight functionality and features, ease of use, multi-property management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Functionality and Features
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Multi-property Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
System Performance and Reliability
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #55 1 reviews | #27 32 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 50 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #51 0 reviews | #15 10 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #17 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #70 1 reviews | #21 42 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #70 0 reviews | #21 34 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #17 33 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #20 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #29 6 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #39 2 reviews | #10 79 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #15 2 reviews |
Choosing the right Property Management System (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s success. You need a solution that streamlines operations, integrates with your existing tech, and provides reliable support. On one hand, Bnovo PMS offers a simple, cloud-based system rooted in the Russian and European markets. On the other, Protel PMS by Planet promises extensive features, a vast integration ecosystem, and support for larger, more complex properties. Which system aligns best with your needs?
Both Bnovo PMS and Protel PMS aim to automate and organize your hotel operations, but they differ significantly in functionality, maturity, and support. Bnovo’s system is more basic, with limited features and a small review base, making it less suitable for complex operations. Protel, however, is a more established platform with hundreds of integrations, detailed features, and a larger global presence. The key question is whether your hotel requires a straightforward system or a more comprehensive platform.
Bnovo is a cloud-based property management solution designed predominantly for motels, villas, and small hotels in Europe, Middle East, and Asia Pacific. It offers essential tools like channel management and EPoS, but its limited review count and low recent feedback suggest it may struggle under more demanding circumstances. Conversely, Protel caters to a wide range of property types including boutique, city center, and resort hotels worldwide, with over 1,200 integrations and a broader feature set. Do you need a simple system, or are you aiming for a scalable platform that can grow with your property?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, budget-friendly solution in a regional context, Bnovo might seem appealing. It is easy to implement and has a notable focus on sales channel connectors and capacity management, which could suit smaller operations. However, the limited recent reviews, poor customer support ratings, and lack of advanced features make it less reliable for ongoing needs or multi-property environments.
Protel, on the other hand, is suitable if your hotel requires extensive functionality, deep integration, and scalability. Its high review count (105 reviews in the last six months) and 4.11/5 overall rating demonstrate proven reliability and user satisfaction. If your team needs detailed reporting, multi-currency support, guest profiles, or advanced automation, Protel is the clear choice. For mid to large hotels or chains looking to future-proof operations, Protel offers the flexibility and robustness that Bnovo currently cannot match.
Bnovo scores a 3/5 for ease of use, with some users noting that the interface is functional but cluttered and outdated. Its onboarding process appears average, and staff adoption might require extra training, especially given its limited support resources. Many reviews mention bugs, crashes, and poor mobile experience as barriers to smooth daily operations.
Protel, in contrast, receives a 4.12/5 rating, with reviews praising its intuitive interface and user-friendly design. Its onboarding process benefits from more extensive resources, and users find managing daily tasks like reservations and reporting straightforward. Support response times are better, though not perfect, but overall, Protel’s UI is more modern and accessible. Edge: Protel.
Bnovo offers only 17 shared features, along with two unique features—Channel Manager and EPoS—indicating a narrow set of core functionalities. It lacks advanced capabilities like guest CRM, multi-lingual support, or automated workflows, limiting its scope. Its integrations are minimal, with only two verified partners, restricting connectivity options.
Protel provides a total of 29 features, including multi-currency, guest profiles, guest CRM, gift vouchers, mobile notes, digital registration, PCI and GDPR compliance, real-time reporting, shift planning, rate management, and more. Its extensive ecosystem of over 1,200 integrations allows for tailored solutions across different hotel segments. The breadth and depth of features favor Protel as the more versatile, future-ready platform. Edge: Protel.
Bnovo’s customer support score is a stark 1.25/5, with reviews citing poor response times, unhelpful support, and system crashes that go unresolved for weeks. Users describe support as unresponsive and not aligned with their needs, which could jeopardize daily operations.
Protel scores nearly three times higher at 3.95/5, with reviews highlighting helpful, friendly support and quick responses—though some mention delays. Customers appreciate the 24/7 availability and multilingual assistance, which are essential for global hotel operations. Overall, Protel’s support quality makes it the safer choice for hotels that depend on reliable help. Edge: Protel.
With 105 recent reviews and a 4.11/5 overall rating, Protel is clearly favored by hoteliers for its reliability, feature set, and support. Users from boutique, city center, and resort hotels praise its comprehensive tools, especially its automation and integration capabilities. Bnovo’s ratings are much lower, with an overall score of 2.25/5 based on only two reviews, both criticizing bugs, poor support, and limited features.
Protel’s higher rating reflects broader acceptance and more recent positive feedback, making it the more trusted platform among hotel professionals.
Edge: Protel.
Bnovo does not list specific pricing, which suggests it may have a custom or regional pricing model, or potentially a more limited free or freemium option. Its affordability could be attractive for small properties with tight budgets but comes with the risk of limited features and support.
Protel charges a flat $500 monthly fee, with no free tier or trial information available. Its pricing reflects its advanced features and extensive ecosystem, positioning it as a premium solution suitable for hotels seeking scalability and deep integrations. If budget is your primary concern, Bnovo might seem appealing, but for long-term value and growth, Protel's investment could prove more worthwhile.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Protel offers a robust, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations and proven reliability, making it ideal for hotels that need more than basic management. Its higher ratings, larger review base, and detailed capabilities position it as the smarter choice for growing or multi-property hotels.
Bnovo is a simpler, regional solution best suited for small properties with limited automation needs and regional focus. Its lower support scores and limited features suggest it is better for budget-conscious hotels in select markets.
If your hotel’s priorities include scalability, automation, and reliable support, Protel is the clear winner. For smaller operations with limited needs and budget, Bnovo might suffice but lacks the robustness for long-term growth.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Bnovo PMS and protel PMS (by Planet) share 17 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise |
Showing top differences. 19 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management.... Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management. However, many reviews expressed disappointment that a lot of these functionalities are incomplete, buggy, or missing entirely when dealing with more complex setups or multi-property environments. Custom reports and seamless integration with other tools are also highlighted as beneficial.
The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the... The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the efficiency in managing daily operations. However, certain updates have made certain functions more complex and less intuitive than before.
Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfa... Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfaces, many found the system frustratingly limited for multi-location setups, highlighting significant bugs and reduced functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor resp... Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor response times after the acquisition by Planet. Users recommend improving the speed and reliability of customer service.
Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. H... Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. However, this flexibility often comes at a high cost, and some required features are only available through paid custom development.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Bnovo PMS and protel PMS (by Planet) share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Bnovo PMS offers 2 verified integration partners, while protel PMS (by Planet) offers 194. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. protel PMS (by Planet) leads in ease of use at 4.1/5 vs 3.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Bnovo PMS: No. protel PMS (by Planet): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Bnovo (Биново) has an HT Score of 0 and Planet has 33. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor