The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES shines .
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 57 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES users most value its , while Counter users highlight user interface and usability, customer support, automated features. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #26 28 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | — | #46 4 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #32 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #31 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #31 16 reviews |
| Luxury | — | #44 4 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | — | #43 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #32 5 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #25 8 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #20 25 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #16 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #11 2 reviews |
When evaluating property management systems (PMS) for your hotel, the key considerations often revolve around usability, feature set, customer support, and regional coverage. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES and Counter are two offerings that aim to streamline your operations, but they differ significantly in maturity, scope, and user reception. Your choice hinges on whether you prioritize a more established platform with extensive review backing or an innovative, specialized system favored by hostels and small properties.
Both products seek to simplify hotel management, but only one is actively supported by a large user base and recent positive reviews. Which one will better meet your specific needs?
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES presents itself as a comprehensive property management system designed for real estate firms, with features tailored to rental and tenant management. Its AI-driven insights and rental-focused tools suggest a broader scope beyond traditional hotel operations, which might be excessive for your hotel’s needs.
Counter, on the other hand, is specifically built for hostels and small properties, emphasizing ease of use, quick onboarding, and operational automation. It is a newer platform with 54 reviews, all recent, and an average rating of 4.73/5, indicating strong user satisfaction.
Counter’s focus on hostels and small hotels means it offers features like automated check-in/out, POS integration, and multi-platform bookings that are vital for budget and boutique properties. BOCS, however, has no reviews and appears to be less active in the hotel space, making Counter the more relevant choice for most hoteliers.
Are you looking for a specialized system that caters to your property size and segment, or a broad platform aimed at property portfolios?
If your hotel is a hostel or small property needing straightforward management with automation and multi-platform integration, Counter is the clear pick. Its user-friendly interface, mobile compatibility, and automation features make daily operations more efficient.
If your hotel requires a robust, enterprise-level system for managing rental properties or complex tenant interactions, BOCS might seem appealing. However, with no recent reviews or clear hotel-specific features, Counter’s proven track record and recent positive feedback make it the better option for most hoteliers.
Counter’s high review count and recent activity lend confidence in its ongoing development and support. BOCS, lacking recent data and reviews, remains an unverified option with limited hotel-specific functionality.
Counter’s UI is consistently rated highly at 4.6/5, with reviews highlighting its simple, clean interface, easy onboarding, and quick staff training. Users also appreciate its mobile-friendly design and intuitive calendar, which streamline daily tasks.
In contrast, BOCS has no usability scores or recent reviews available, making it impossible to assess user experience. Given Counter’s strong, recent user feedback on ease of use, it is undoubtedly the simpler platform to implement and adopt.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 features, including a channel manager, booking engine, payment processing, housekeeper modules, group bookings, multi-currency, multi-lingual support, and automated night audits. These features are specifically tailored to improve hotel operations and revenue management.
BOCS provides no features or integrations listed, focusing instead on rental and tenant management, AI insights, and property analysis. For your hotel, Counter’s rich suite of hotel-centric features clearly outperforms the limited scope of BOCS.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support team is praised for its responsiveness, with reviews mentioning “quick” replies and “helpful” staff like Evelyn and Max. Its overall customer support rating of 4.96/5 indicates very high satisfaction among users, especially in North America and Europe.
BOCS, with no recent reviews, provides no data on support quality. The absence of recent feedback makes Counter the more dependable choice for ongoing assistance.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including Stripe, Cloudbeds, SiteMinder, and Goki, covering payments, channel management, and access control. These integrations support seamless operations across platforms, crucial for modern hotels.
BOCS reports no verified integrations, which limits its utility in a multi-platform environment. For most hotels, Counter’s integrations are a significant advantage.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s recent reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.75/5 rating from 52 users in the hostel segment, and a 4/5 rating from an independent hotel review. Its recent review count and high ratings suggest strong user satisfaction.
BOCS has no reviews, making it impossible to gauge user sentiment or satisfaction. Based on available data, Counter is clearly the higher-rated platform.
Edge: Counter.
Both products do not disclose specific pricing structures, although Counter is described as a free system, which is ideal for small properties or startups. BOCS’ lack of transparency suggests it may involve custom quotes or enterprise pricing, likely suited for larger firms.
For budget-conscious hotels or hostels, Counter’s free model is a compelling advantage, while BOCS’ cost may be justified for extensive property portfolios.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
BOCS offers a broad AI-powered platform aimed at rental and real estate markets, with little evidence of recent hotel-specific success. It’s a solid choice for large property managers but lacks recent hotel-focused reviews or features.
Counter, with over 50 recent reviews and a 4.73/5 score, is a well-supported, hotel-specific PMS that excels in ease of use, automation, and integrations. It is particularly ideal for hostels and small hotels seeking a straightforward, reliable solution.
Choose BOCS if your property management extends beyond hotels into rental real estate, and you need an AI-driven platform. For most hoteliers, especially those in the hostel segment or small boutique hotels, Counter is the safer, more proven option that will improve daily operations and guest experiences.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES and Counter share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES and Counter share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES offers 0 verified integration partners, while Counter offers 7. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES: No. Counter: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES has an HT Score of 0 and Counter has 17. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor