The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Bokun shines .
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 57 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Bokun users most value its , while Counter users highlight user interface and usability, customer support, automated features. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Bokun |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Bokun |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #26 28 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | — | #46 4 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #32 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #31 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Bokun |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #31 16 reviews |
| Luxury | — | #44 4 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | — | #43 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #32 5 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Bokun |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #25 8 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #20 25 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #16 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #11 2 reviews |
You're evaluating two property management systems—Bokun by Bokun and Counter—both designed to streamline operations and improve guest management. Bokun primarily targets tour operators and activity providers, while Counter is built specifically for hostels. Both aim to simplify daily tasks but diverge significantly in their scope, user base, and feature sets.
Bokun offers a comprehensive booking platform with a focus on tours, activities, and experience providers, whereas Counter provides an all-in-one PMS tailored for hostel operations. Given your needs, which platform aligns better with your hotel’s operational priorities?
Bokun and Counter address different core hotel needs. Bokun excels in managing experience bookings, inventory, and real-time availability synchronization across channels—ideal if your hotel offers tours, activities, or packages as part of your guest experience. Counter, on the other hand, focuses on streamlining front desk operations, reservations, and housekeeping specifically for hostels.
Bokun, with zero recent reviews and a low overall rating of 0/5, lacks the recent user feedback necessary to assess its current viability for hotels. Conversely, Counter boasts 54 reviews over the last six months, with an overall rating of 4.73/5 and a strong customer support score of 4.96/5, making it a more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking active, recent feedback. Do you need a system focused on experience management or daily hostel operations?
If your hotel offers activities, tours, or experience packages, Bokun is worth considering for its inventory management and online distribution channels. Its platform is designed to handle complex arrangements like multi-day bookings or custom pricing for experiences.
However, if you operate a hostel or budget hotel needing a straightforward, user-friendly PMS with automation and guest management features, Counter is the clear winner. Its dedicated features for hostels, like automated night audits, POS integration, and group bookings, cater directly to your operational needs. For small to midsize hostels, Counter’s proven track record makes it the safer, more supportive choice.
Counter scores significantly higher in ease of use, with a 4.6/5 rating and multiple reviews praising its intuitive interface and quick staff onboarding. Users note that staff can learn and adapt to Counter swiftly, even with minimal training, citing its mobile-friendly design and clear calendar views.
Bokun, with a 0/5 rating and no recent reviews, shows no recent evidence of user satisfaction or usability, making it difficult to gauge its current platform experience. Given the active user feedback, Counter clearly has the edge.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers a suite of 19 features exclusive to its platform, including a channel manager, payment processing, booking engine, housekeeping module, guest CRM, multi-currency, multi-lingual support, and automated night audits. These features directly enhance operational efficiency and guest management for hostels.
Bokun, with no unique features listed apart from its core booking system, lacks the extensive functionality Counter provides. Its platform appears more limited in scope, making Counter’s broader feature set a decisive advantage for hotel operators seeking comprehensive tools.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support ratings are exceptional, with a 4.96/5 score based on recent reviews that highlight responsive, helpful customer service—especially from staff like Evelyn and Max. Guests appreciate their quick response times and proactive problem-solving.
In contrast, Bokun offers no recent reviews or rating data, making it difficult to assess its current support quality. The absence of recent feedback suggests that Counter’s customer support is superior and more dependable.
Edge: Counter.
Counter has verified integrations with seven partners, including Stripe, Goki, Cloudbeds, and SiteMinder. These connections enable seamless payment processing, channel management, and access control, vital for hostel operations.
Bokun currently reports zero verified partners, limiting its integration capabilities. For streamlining your tech stack and expanding distribution channels, Counter’s broader integration network offers a clear advantage.
Edge: Counter.
With 54 recent reviews, Counter enjoys a high overall rating of 4.73/5, particularly praised by hostel operators and small hotel managers. Users commend its ease of use, automation, and support responsiveness, with some describing it as “the best PMS for hostels.”
Bokun’s lack of recent reviews and a 0/5 rating make it impossible to gauge current user satisfaction. Based on the available data, Counter’s ratings clearly demonstrate its appeal to hoteliers and hostel owners alike.
Edge: Counter.
Both platforms do not publicly disclose specific pricing details or subscription models. They are offered without trial periods or implementation fees, but exact costs likely vary based on your property size and feature needs.
Given the lack of transparent pricing, your decision may hinge on evaluating the value and features provided, especially since Counter’s extensive feature set can offer significant ROI for hostel operations.
Bokun is best suited for experience-focused businesses rather than traditional hotels.
Counter’s features are designed to optimize hostel and budget hotel workflows, making it the ideal choice for these segments.
The primary difference lies in their core focus: Bokun is tailored for experience and activity providers, while Counter is built for hostel operations. Counter’s active reviews, high ratings, and broad feature set make it the more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking a user-friendly, full-featured PMS.
Choose Bokun if your hotel heavily relies on experience sales and distribution channels, but for daily operations, automation, and support, Counter stands out as the superior option.
If your property demands a versatile, easy-to-use platform with proven support, Counter is the clear winner. Its recent reviews and extensive feature list demonstrate it’s the more mature, hotel-centric solution ready to meet your operational needs now.
According to HTR's product database, Bokun and Counter share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Bokun |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Bokun and Counter share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Bokun offers 0 verified integration partners, while Counter offers 7. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Bokun: No. Counter: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Bokun has an HT Score of 0 and Counter has 17. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor