The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
MyComp shines .
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 57 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, MyComp users most value its , while Counter users highlight user interface and usability, customer support, automated features. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| MyComp |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #26 28 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | — | #46 4 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #32 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #31 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #31 16 reviews |
| Luxury | — | #44 4 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | — | #43 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #32 5 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #25 8 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #20 25 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #16 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #11 2 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's operational efficiency, guest experience, and revenue. Both Booking Engine CRS by MyComp and Counter aim to streamline your hotel operations, but they serve different segments and come with distinct strengths.
MyComp’s Booking Engine CRS is designed as a central reservation platform with a focus on automation, revenue management, and integration into larger hotel systems. Counter, on the other hand, caters specifically to hostels and small accommodations with a straightforward, mobile-friendly interface and a suite of management tools.
Your decision hinges on whether you need an all-encompassing reservation engine or a lightweight, easy-to-use PMS tailored for hostels. Do you want a solution that scales with your property’s growth, or one that simplifies daily management at a lower cost?
Counter has a significantly higher overall rating (4.73/5) based on 54 recent reviews and a 91% likelihood to recommend, making it the more trusted choice among hoteliers. MyComp’s rating is 0/5 with no recent reviews, limiting confidence in its capabilities and customer satisfaction.
Counter’s extensive user base, especially in the hostel segment, and recent positive feedback about ease of use and customer support, make it the more reliable option for small to mid-sized properties. Conversely, MyComp’s lack of recent data and reviews suggests limited current relevance for hoteliers evaluating PMS options.
Does this mean Counter is the clear leader for your property? Let’s explore the specifics.
MyComp’s Booking Engine CRS is built to integrate with larger hotel systems, offering automation, real-time updates, and detailed analytics. It targets properties seeking to optimize revenue through dynamic pricing and inventory control but has no recent reviews or third-party integrations, raising questions about its current effectiveness.
Counter is tailored for hostels and small accommodations, focusing on simplicity and mobility. Its features include check-in/out management, POS integration, and automated payments—all highly valued by users. The key divergence is that MyComp appears more suited for larger hotel chains or properties with complex revenue management needs, while Counter excels at streamlining daily hostel operations.
Are you looking for a system that can handle complex revenue strategies or one that simplifies guest management? Your choice depends on this core requirement.
If your hotel needs a highly-rated, user-friendly PMS with extensive integrations, Counter is the clear choice. Its 4.73/5 rating from 54 recent reviews, especially from hostel operators, demonstrates its practical value and ease of adoption.
If, however, your property demands advanced revenue management, automation, and integration into a broader reservation ecosystem, MyComp’s offering—despite limited recent reviews—may be more suitable. For small hostels or properties prioritizing simplicity, Counter’s features and user support make it the better fit.
In summary, for small to mid-sized properties focused on ease and support, Counter is the safer bet; for larger, complex operations, you might need to explore other options.
Counter leads with a 4.6/5 ease-of-use rating based on reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface, mobile accessibility, and straightforward management tools. Users frequently mention how quickly new staff can learn the system and how responsive the support team is.
MyComp, with a 0/5 rating, provides no recent data on usability. Its lack of reviews suggests limited adoption or confidence from current users, especially in comparison with Counter’s active, positive feedback.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features, including channel management, online support, group bookings, multi-currency and multilingual options, and a guest CRM. It also provides automation tools like POS integration, automatic payments, and reporting—features critical for operational efficiency in small properties.
MyComp’s Booking Engine CRS has no listed unique features and appears to serve primarily as a reservation engine without added functionalities like channel management or revenue optimization.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support is rated 4.96/5, with reviews highlighting its responsiveness, helpfulness, and professionalism—specifically mentioning staff like Evelyn and Max. Reviewers note quick replies and proactive problem resolution, underpinning confidence in ongoing support.
MyComp offers no recent data or reviews on customer support, making it impossible to assess current service quality. Based on available information, Counter’s support team is clearly the more reliable and well-regarded.
Edge: Counter.
Counter has 7 verified integrations, including Stripe, Cloudbeds, SiteMinder, and Goki, covering payments, channel management, and property services. MyComp, with zero verified integrations, limits your ability to connect with other platforms.
For properties relying on multiple third-party tools or seeking a flexible, connected system, Counter’s integrations provide significant operational advantages.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s reviews are recent and abundant, with a 4.73/5 rating and a 91% willingness to recommend, particularly among hostel operators and small property owners. MyComp’s lack of recent reviews and a 0/5 rating reflect very limited current user satisfaction or adoption.
Considering recent feedback, Counter is the preferred choice, especially for properties valuing proven user satisfaction and ongoing support.
Edge: Counter.
Both products do not publicly disclose specific pricing details, indicating potentially customized quotes or costs embedded within broader packages. However, Counter is described as free and easy to implement, particularly suited for hostels and small properties.
MyComp’s lack of available pricing data suggests it might be more complex or targeted at larger clients, potentially with higher costs. For small-hotels and hostels, Counter’s accessible pricing model is an advantage.
MyComp is best for larger properties with sophisticated revenue strategies but may be overkill for small, independent establishments.
Counter is ideal for small to medium-sized properties focused on daily operations and guest experience.
MyComp’s Booking Engine CRS presents an integrated reservation platform tailored for larger, revenue-focused properties but has no recent reviews or user feedback to substantiate its current effectiveness. Its core strength lies in automation and dynamic pricing, making it suitable for properties with complex revenue needs.
Counter, with its high ratings, robust features, and active support, is the better choice for small to mid-sized hostels and boutique hotels. Its ease of use, extensive integrations, and recent positive reviews make it the safer bet for properties seeking operational simplicity and reliable support.
In conclusion, if your hotel is a small property or hostel seeking a straightforward, well-supported PMS, go with Counter. For larger hotels with sophisticated revenue strategies, explore other options that offer deeper integration and automation—myComp’s offering remains uncertain in today’s market.
According to HTR's product database, Booking Engine CRS and Counter share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Booking Engine CRS and Counter share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Booking Engine CRS offers 0 verified integration partners, while Counter offers 7. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Booking Engine CRS: No. Counter: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. MyComp has an HT Score of 0 and Counter has 17. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor