The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 108 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
MyComp shines .
Planet shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like On premise and Revenue management module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 108 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 108 |
After analyzing 108 verified reviews, MyComp users most value its , while Planet users highlight functionality and features, ease of use, multi-property management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| MyComp |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Functionality and Features
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Multi-property Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
System Performance and Reliability
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #27 32 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 50 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 10 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #17 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #21 42 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #21 34 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #17 33 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #20 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #29 6 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #10 79 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #15 2 reviews |
Choosing between Booking Engine CRS by MyComp and protel PMS by Planet involves weighing two different core solutions designed to optimize hotel operations. Booking Engine CRS centers on reservation management and revenue optimization, aiming to streamline booking processes and increase occupancy. In contrast, protel PMS offers a broad property management platform with deep integration capabilities and extensive tools for operational control. Your choice hinges on whether your primary focus is reservation automation or comprehensive property management.
Both products serve the hotel industry but diverge significantly in scope and maturity. MyComp’s Booking Engine CRS is a niche solution, focusing on booking and revenue with a limited review footprint. Planet’s protel PMS, meanwhile, has a well-established presence, with over 105 recent reviews and a high user rating, giving it a more reliable performance track record. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s strategic priorities?
Booking Engine CRS by MyComp is designed to optimize the reservation flow, automate booking management, and enhance revenue through dynamic pricing and inventory control. Its primary function is to boost direct bookings and reduce operational overhead but lacks broader property management features.
protel PMS by Planet offers a full suite of property management tools, from front desk operations to guest profiles, billing, and reporting. It is built to automate processes at every stage of the guest journey and supports multi-property setups, which MyComp’s solution does not. Given its 105 reviews and recent positive feedback, protel PMS’s stronger reputation makes it the more proven choice.
The key distinction is scope: Do you need a booking engine or a full PMS? Both solve operational efficiencies but for different hotel needs. Are you seeking a single feature or a comprehensive management system?
If your hotel focuses on increasing direct reservations, reducing booking friction, and integrating with modern distribution channels, Booking Engine CRS could be appealing. However, its lack of a broad property management backend limits its use for operational control.
Conversely, if your team needs an all-in-one platform that manages reservations, front desk, billing, housekeeping, and reporting, protel PMS is the clear choice. It’s especially suitable for hotels with complex operations, multi-property portfolios, or plans to scale, as it boasts over 195 integrations and the flexibility of both cloud and on-premise deployment.
For properties aiming to streamline all aspects of daily management while maintaining flexibility, protel PMS’s comprehensive features and extensive ecosystem make it the more appropriate solution. Would you prefer specialized booking automation or a full hotel management platform?
Booking Engine CRS by MyComp has not publicly shared a user rating, but given its focus on booking functions, it’s likely designed for straightforward integration with existing CMS or website tools. Its interface is praised for automation, but onboarding and staff adoption details are scarce due to limited recent reviews.
protel PMS by Planet scores a 4.12/5 for ease of use, with its reviews highlighting an intuitive interface and fast onboarding. Hoteliers note that its user-friendly design simplifies daily operations, although some mention that recent updates can introduce complexity.
Edge: protel PMS. Its strong user feedback and higher review count indicate a more reliable, easier-to-implement system for hotel staff.
Booking Engine CRS provides core reservation features, including inventory control, dynamic pricing, and automation of booking processes, but lacks the extensive suite of operational tools.
protel PMS offers over 46 features, including revenue management, multi-currency support, guest CRM, housekeeping modules, integrated payments, digital registration, and real-time reporting. It supports both cloud and on-premise setups, allowing greater customization and adaptability.
Edge: protel PMS. Its broader feature set and deeper operational integration make it the more comprehensive platform for hotels seeking to manage all aspects of property operations.
MyComp’s Booking Engine CRS has no recent review data, making support quality difficult to evaluate. Its limited customer feedback suggests a lack of recent engagement or widespread deployment.
protel PMS, with an average customer support rating of 3.95/5, demonstrates a focus on 24/7 support, multilingual assistance, and onboarding. Recent reviews praise the support team’s professionalism, though some mention response times can be improved.
Edge: protel PMS. Its established support infrastructure and recent positive reviews give it a slight advantage in customer service.
Booking Engine CRS by MyComp boasts zero verified partners, indicating a very limited ecosystem, likely restricting connectivity to third-party systems.
protel PMS, with over 195 verified integrations, connects seamlessly with a wide array of hospitality systems, including channel managers, revenue tools, payment processors, and more. This extensive ecosystem facilitates smoother operations and increased flexibility.
Edge: protel PMS. Its large ecosystem of integrations supports scalable, multi-channel hotel management.
Given the review data, protel PMS’s 4.11/5 rating, based on 105 recent reviews, clearly surpasses MyComp’s nonexistent or unverified score. Hoteliers in diverse segments—independent hotels, resorts, boutique properties—appreciate its robustness and support.
MyComp’s Booking Engine CRS lacks recent reviews or a rating, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction reliably. The high volume and current positive feedback for protel PMS make it the more trusted option.
Edge: protel PMS. Its higher ratings and recent reviews make it the preferred choice among hoteliers.
MyComp’s Booking Engine CRS does not specify pricing details, leaving potential buyers uncertain about investment levels.
protel PMS is priced at $500 monthly, with no free tier or trial available. This predictable flat fee encompasses the extensive features and integrations, providing transparency for budgeting.
If cost transparency is crucial, protel PMS’s published pricing offers clarity, whereas Booking Engine CRS’s costs remain ambiguous.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The fundamental difference is scope: Booking Engine CRS centers on reservation automation, while protel PMS provides a full management platform. If your priority is boosting direct bookings and revenue with a specialized tool, Booking Engine CRS might suffice.
However, for hotels that need a scalable, integrated property management solution capable of handling multi-property operations and automating workflows, protel PMS is the clear winner. Its extensive feature set, proven reputation, and wide ecosystem make it the more reliable choice.
Choose Booking Engine CRS if your goal is to optimize reservations specifically and you already have a PMS in place. Opt for protel PMS if you want a complete, flexible system that manages your entire hotel operation efficiently.
This comparison reflects the current review landscape, where protel PMS’s higher volume of recent reviews and stronger ratings make it the more dependable option for most hotels today.
According to HTR's product database, Booking Engine CRS and protel PMS (by Planet) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 34 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
What hoteliers love
Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management.... Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management. However, many reviews expressed disappointment that a lot of these functionalities are incomplete, buggy, or missing entirely when dealing with more complex setups or multi-property environments. Custom reports and seamless integration with other tools are also highlighted as beneficial.
The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the... The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the efficiency in managing daily operations. However, certain updates have made certain functions more complex and less intuitive than before.
Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfa... Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfaces, many found the system frustratingly limited for multi-location setups, highlighting significant bugs and reduced functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor resp... Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor response times after the acquisition by Planet. Users recommend improving the speed and reliability of customer service.
Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. H... Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. However, this flexibility often comes at a high cost, and some required features are only available through paid custom development.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Booking Engine CRS and protel PMS (by Planet) share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Booking Engine CRS offers 0 verified integration partners, while protel PMS (by Planet) offers 194. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. protel PMS (by Planet) leads in ease of use at 4.1/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Booking Engine CRS: No. protel PMS (by Planet): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. MyComp has an HT Score of 0 and Planet has 33. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor