The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Bookinglayer shines , with exclusive features like Online Check-in and Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc).
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Mobile App and Guest CRM.
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 57 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Bookinglayer users most value its , while Counter users highlight user interface and usability, customer support, automated features. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #26 28 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | — | #46 4 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #32 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #31 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #31 16 reviews |
| Luxury | — | #44 4 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | — | #43 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #32 5 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #25 8 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #20 25 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #16 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #11 2 reviews |
Your hotel is evaluating two property management systems (PMS): Bookinglayer and Counter. Both aim to streamline operations, improve guest experience, and maximize revenue, but they cater to different market segments and have distinct strengths. Bookinglayer offers a more comprehensive feature set tailored for businesses combining activities and accommodation, while Counter focuses on ease of use for hostels with strong automation and support. Given their different focuses, which is the better fit for your property?
Bookinglayer and Counter address core hotel management needs but diverge in their target audiences and feature depth. Bookinglayer handles reservations, packages, and activity bookings, making it ideal for adventure travel, wellness retreats, or businesses offering combined services. Conversely, Counter emphasizes simple, mobile-friendly operation specifically for hostels, prioritizing ease of use and automation. Do you need a versatile platform for complex bookings or a straightforward system for guest management?
Bookinglayer's strength lies in its extensive feature list, including gift vouchers, digital registration, rate management, and online check-in, catering to hotels offering more diverse services. Counter, on the other hand, excels in its intuitive interface, fast onboarding, and automation features that reduce manual work for hostel staff. Their review scores reflect this: Counter has a higher overall rating (4.73/5) and more recent, positive feedback, while Bookinglayer’s reviews are sparse and outdated. Is your hotel looking for a broad, customizable system or a simple, reliable platform?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich platform supporting activities, packages, and complex rate management, go with Bookinglayer. It is suited for mid-sized or larger properties that want to sell fixed-date trips, add-ons, or manage multiple revenue streams in one system. Conversely, if your hostel or small property prioritizes ease of use, automation, and mobile management, Counter is the better choice, especially given its extensive positive reviews from hostel operators.
Bookinglayer's $600 base price might be justified if you require features like GDPR compliance, transactional emails, or online check-in. Counter's free pricing model and high user ratings make it appealing for hostels seeking affordability and simplicity. When considering your property type and operational complexity, which system aligns best with your needs?
Counter scores a 4.6/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its clean, intuitive interface, and quick onboarding process. Users highlight its mobile-friendly design, which allows staff to manage bookings on the go, and appreciate the straightforward calendar view. Bookinglayer's reviews are nonexistent or outdated, so direct comparison is limited, but its feature-rich platform suggests a steeper learning curve.
Counter's user feedback underscores how quickly staff adapt to its simple layout, with onboarding rated at 4.7/5. Its interface minimizes training time, making it ideal for hostel staff or small teams without dedicated IT support. Edge: Counter.
Bookinglayer offers 12 unique features not found in Counter, including gift vouchers, digital registration, rate management, online check-in, transactional emails, payment requests, and GDPR compliance. These features make it suitable for hotels that need comprehensive booking options and administrative automation.
Counter provides 11 features exclusive to its platform, such as a calendar view, RevPAR & ADR reports, direct billing, group functionality, automated night audit, POS integration, mobile app, guest CRM, guest profiles, and ancillary revenue tracking. Its automation and POS features are especially valuable for hostel management.
Both systems share 8 features, like basic reservation management and integrations, but Bookinglayer's added capabilities cater to more complex operations. Which set of unique features aligns better with your property’s operational needs?
Edge: Bookinglayer.
Counter's support scores are nearly perfect at 4.96/5, with reviews consistently praising the responsiveness and professionalism of support staff like Evelyn and Max. Users mention quick responses to issues and ongoing improvements, although some note support can be slower across different time zones.
Bookinglayer's support ratings are unavailable, and with no recent reviews, it's hard to gauge current support quality. The lack of recent customer feedback suggests less confidence in ongoing support compared to Counter. Given the importance of reliable support, Edge: Counter.
Counter boasts seven verified integrations, including popular platforms like Stripe, Goki, SiteMinder, and Channex, providing flexibility for revenue streams and access control. Bookinglayer has only one verified partner, limiting its connectivity options.
Counter's broader integration ecosystem allows seamless connection with channel managers, payment providers, and access systems, streamlining overall operations. If your property relies on multiple platforms, Counter’s extensive integrations give it a decisive advantage. Edge: Counter.
With a 4.73/5 overall rating based on 54 reviews, Counter has more recent and positive feedback, especially from hostel operators. Hoteliers appreciate its ease of use, automation, and support, often citing it as a significant upgrade over previous systems.
Bookinglayer’s ratings are unavailable in recent data, and its reviews are scarce or outdated, making it difficult to assess current hotel sentiment. Since recent reviews typically indicate the current quality of the product, Counter’s higher rating and active user feedback make it the safer choice. Edge: Counter.
Bookinglayer charges a $600 monthly flat fee with no free tier, no trial, and no implementation fee. Pricing for Counter is not publicly specified, but it is described as a free system, suggesting a lower barrier for small properties or hostels.
Counter's free model, combined with automation features and extensive integrations, offers a compelling value for hostels and small properties. Bookinglayer's upfront cost might be justified for properties needing its advanced features, but for affordability and simpler operations, Counter is more accessible.
Bookinglayer and Counter address different needs within the property management landscape. Bookinglayer’s broad feature set suits hotels with complex booking requirements, while Counter’s simplicity and automation make it ideal for hostels and small properties.
If your hotel requires a versatile, activity-inclusive platform with detailed administrative tools, Bookinglayer offers valuable capabilities, especially if your team is prepared for a learning curve and higher cost. For small, budget-conscious properties that value ease of use, automation, and fast support, Counter stands out as the better choice.
In conclusion, choose Bookinglayer if your hotel needs a comprehensive, customizable system supporting diverse services. Opt for Counter if you prioritize intuitive operation, automation, and excellent support to streamline hostel management. Either way, understanding your specific operational needs will ensure the best fit for your property’s future.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Bookinglayer and Counter share 8 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated night audit | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Digital Registration | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Drag-n-Drop Tapechart | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Group functionality | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Rate Management | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 11 more features differ between these products.
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Bookinglayer and Counter share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Bookinglayer offers 1 verified integration partners, while Counter offers 7. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Bookinglayer: No. Counter: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Bookinglayer has an HT Score of 0 and Counter has 17. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor