The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
BookingSync shines .
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 57 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, BookingSync users most value its , while Counter users highlight user interface and usability, customer support, automated features. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| BookingSync |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | BookingSync |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #26 28 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | — | #46 4 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #32 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #31 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | BookingSync |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #31 16 reviews |
| Luxury | — | #44 4 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | — | #43 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #32 5 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | BookingSync |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #25 8 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #20 25 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #16 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #11 2 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can fundamentally impact your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Both BookingSync and Counter aim to streamline your management processes, but they serve different segments and needs. BookingSync is designed primarily for vacation rental managers, while Counter focuses on hostels and small-scale hospitality providers. Do you need a versatile platform for multiple property types or a specialized system for hostels? Let's explore.
BookingSync is a comprehensive PMS tailored for vacation rental businesses, offering extensive automation, multi-channel synchronization, and detailed financial reporting. Counter, on the other hand, is a lightweight, easy-to-use system built specifically for hostels, emphasizing simplicity, mobility, and automation of daily tasks. However, BookingSync’s absence of recent reviews and a low rating suggest it might lack the support and usability hoteliers need.
Counter boasts a high customer support score (4.96/5) and a recent user base of 54 reviews, with all recent feedback praising its ease of use and automation features. Nevertheless, it faces issues with bugs like overbooking and bed availability, which could hinder smooth operations for larger or more complex properties. Do these differences matter for your hotel’s size and complexity?
If your hotel primarily manages hostels or small properties with a focus on simplicity, automation, and mobile management, Counter is the smarter choice. It’s free, user-friendly, and highly rated by hostel operators, making onboarding quick and staff training straightforward. Conversely, BookingSync’s niche in vacation rentals and lack of recent reviews make it less suitable unless your property portfolio aligns with vacation rentals and you require multi-channel automation.
Counter’s high support rating and intuitive interface suit small teams seeking minimal disruption. BookingSync’s limited reviews and no recent feedback make it harder to justify for hotels needing reliable, regular support and quick updates. As a hotelier, you want a system that adapts easily to your operations — Counter’s recent positive reviews indicate it might serve that purpose better.
Counter outperforms BookingSync significantly here. Counter’s user rating of 4.6/5 reflects its intuitive, mobile-friendly interface, and recent reviews highlight its simplicity and ease of onboarding. Users describe it as "very friendly," with "no teaching needed" and a "seamless" experience, especially for staff with limited technical skills.
BookingSync scores 0/5 for ease of use, with no recent reviews and a lack of clarity about its onboarding process and UI. Its complexity seems geared toward experienced vacation rental managers rather than small hotel teams. Edge: Counter.
Counter boasts 19 unique features, including a channel manager, integrated booking engine, POS system, automated night audit, group bookings, multi-currency, and guest CRM. BookingSync offers no verified features or integrations, suggesting it is less feature-rich or possibly lacks active development.
Counter’s features directly address hostel needs, such as mobile management, online support, and ancillary revenue tracking. BookingSync’s lack of additional features in recent data indicates it may not provide the operational tools necessary for hotel management. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s recent reviews give it an average support rating of 4.96/5, with comments praising its responsiveness, especially from staff like Evelyn and Max. Hoteliers emphasize that support is quick, helpful, and proactive, making it a strong asset for small teams needing dependable assistance.
BookingSync’s support ratings are unavailable, and no recent reviews exist, which raises concerns about ongoing support and updates. For hotels that value reliable, prompt assistance, Counter’s demonstrated customer service clearly leads. Edge: Counter.
Counter offers integrations with seven verified partners, including Stripe, Goki, Cloudbeds, and SiteMinder, covering payments, channel management, and access control. BookingSync, with zero verified integrations, likely limits your ability to connect with essential tools.
This integration ecosystem means Counter can streamline your operations across booking, payments, and guest access while expanding your reach. BookingSync’s lack of integrations suggests it may not be suitable if your property relies on specific third-party tools. Edge: Counter.
Counter has a review score of 4.73/5 from 54 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing ease of use, automation, and support. Many hostel operators highlight its ability to reduce manual work and improve guest experience.
BookingSync’s rating remains at 0/5 with no recent reviews, indicating no current customer feedback or ongoing support. For property managers prioritizing user satisfaction and recent validation, Counter clearly has the edge.
Both products do not disclose specific pricing models, but Counter is described as free, which makes it highly accessible for small hostels and budget-conscious properties. BookingSync’s pricing is unclear, and its lack of recent reviews suggests it may not be affordable or flexible for small hotels.
Counter’s free model, combined with its feature set, offers a compelling value proposition, especially for startups or small-scale operations. For larger or more complex properties, you may need to inquire further, but Counter’s no-cost approach gives it an immediate advantage.
Hotels that manage vacation rentals, multiple properties, or require extensive automation for multi-channel distribution should consider BookingSync. Its centralization of bookings, guest communication, and financial management makes it suitable for property managers with diverse portfolios.
Counter is less suited for large vacation rental portfolios, but it excels for hostels, small boutique hotels, and independent operators. It’s ideal if your team prioritizes ease of use, automation of daily operational tasks, and mobile management.
Not ideal if:
Counter is designed for hostels, B&Bs, and small boutique hotels, especially those that value simplicity and mobility. It supports automated check-ins, POS integration, and guest management, making it suitable for properties with a high volume of short-stay guests.
Not ideal if:
The fundamental difference between these two systems lies in their target audience and feature sets. BookingSync offers a platform for vacation rental managers, focusing on multi-channel distribution and financial automation, but it lacks recent reviews and a clear support structure. Counter is a dedicated, highly-rated system for hostels, emphasizing ease of use, automation, and customer support, with a broad feature set suitable for small to medium-sized properties.
If your hotel needs a straightforward, support-rich system with active development and recent positive reviews, Counter is the clear choice. BookingSync might serve larger vacation rental portfolios better but appears less reliable for current hotel management needs.
Choose Counter if you prioritize ease, support, and recent validation. Opt for BookingSync only if your property management requires extensive vacation rental automation and multi-channel capabilities, and you’re prepared to navigate its limited recent support data.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| BookingSync |
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, BookingSync and Counter share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | BookingSync |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. BookingSync and Counter share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. BookingSync offers 0 verified integration partners, while Counter offers 7. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
BookingSync: No. Counter: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. BookingSync has an HT Score of 0 and Counter has 17. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor