The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] shines .
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 47 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] users most value its , while Infor users highlight ease of use, reporting, integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #44 8 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #25 24 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #19 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #24 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #28 24 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #23 26 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #29 8 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #31 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #22 20 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #24 17 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #28 1 reviews |
Choosing between Cambridge PMS by Shiji and Infor HMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but they diverge significantly in features, market presence, and user feedback. Cambridge PMS is largely unreviewed, making Infor’s more established reputation and extensive user base critical factors in your decision.
Cambridge PMS touts simplicity, but its near-zero review count makes it difficult to confirm its effectiveness. In contrast, Infor boasts over 46 recent reviews and a 4.04/5 overall rating, giving you a clearer picture of its performance. Do you prioritize proven support and feature breadth or are you willing to test an unreviewed platform?
Cambridge PMS, with no recent reviews and a 0/5 overall rating, offers limited insight into user satisfaction or real-world application. Its core problem appears to be a lack of data and proven implementation success, leaving hoteliers unsure of its reliability.
Infor HMS, rated 4.04/5 from over 46 reviews, demonstrates a stronger track record of reliability, ease of use, and support. It’s praised for its extensive features like seamless integrations, customizable reporting, and efficient housekeeping modules.
Cambridge PMS is likely a risk, given its review silence and no evident market presence. Conversely, Infor’s solid ratings and active user feedback suggest it’s a safer choice for hotels seeking validation and ongoing support.
Do you prefer a product with proven, detailed reviews or are you prepared to evaluate an untested system?
If your hotel needs a cloud-based platform with extensive integrations, robust features, and a proven track record, Infor HMS is the clear choice. Its 113 verified partners and 46 recent reviews provide confidence in its capabilities and ongoing support.
If, however, you are a small property seeking a basic, potentially low-cost solution without extensive user feedback, Cambridge PMS might seem appealing. Still, with zero reviews and no visible market presence, it’s hard to recommend confidently.
For hotels that prioritize functionality, support, and proven success, Infor’s feature set—including housekeeping, revenue management, and guest profiles—is unmatched. For those willing to experiment with a less proven system, Cambridge PMS could be a gamble.
Cambridge PMS provides no available user ratings or reviews, making it impossible to gauge its ease of use or onboarding experience. Its lack of feedback suggests it may not have widespread adoption or proven usability.
Infor HMS scores 3.88/5 for ease of use, with reviews citing intuitive navigation once familiar and quick onboarding—average ratings of 3.64/5. Users appreciate its mobile options and flexibility, though some mention room for interface improvements.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Cambridge PMS offers no unique features documented in reviews or data, implying a limited feature set or a lack of market differentiation. Its feature count is zero, offering no clear advantages.
Infor HMS, with 20 distinct features, includes modules like housekeeping, guest CRM, multi-lingual support, revenue management, and automated night audits—features that add tangible value. Its comprehensive suite supports operational automation, guest personalization, and revenue growth.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Cambridge PMS offers no review data or support ratings, making it impossible to evaluate support quality. Its lack of reviews suggests limited customer engagement or visibility.
Infor HMS, with support rated at 4.04/5, is praised for responsiveness, professionalism, and helpful guidance. Multiple reviews mention support teams guiding users through issues promptly, an essential factor for operational stability.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Cambridge PMS has just one verified integration partner, indicating limited connectivity options. Its market presence and connectivity appear minimal, restricting its ability to integrate with other systems.
Infor HMS boasts 113 verified partners, including major industry players like Duetto, and offers integrations with booking platforms such as Booking.com, Expedia, and HRS. This breadth allows your hotel to connect seamlessly with revenue, distribution, and ERP systems.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Cambridge PMS, with no reviews, provides no data on hotel ratings or user sentiment. Its lack of reviews leaves its performance and satisfaction levels unverified.
Infor HMS, rated 4.04/5 based on 46 reviews, receives positive feedback from hotels of various sizes and segments. Its overall satisfaction score, combined with recent reviews, signals confidence among users.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Pricing details for Cambridge PMS are unavailable, with no indication of whether it is free, subscription-based, or requires implementation fees. The lack of transparency suggests it may not be a mainstream solution.
Infor HMS does not provide explicit pricing but indicates a standard SaaS model without implementation fees or visible subscription tiers. You will need to contact Infor for a tailored quote.
Both products' costs are undefined publicly, so consider this a factor for further inquiry.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in market presence and review data. Infor HMS is a mature, well-reviewed platform supporting a broad range of hotel types with extensive features.
Choose Infor if you need a trusted, fully integrated system with proven support, especially for larger or more complex operations. Its comprehensive feature set and active user feedback make it the safer, more strategic investment.
Cambridge PMS remains an untested, unreviewed option. It might appeal to very small hotels or properties with minimal needs, but without reviews, confidence in its performance remains uncertain.
In conclusion, for most hotels, Infor HMS offers a more reliable, feature-rich, and supported choice. Its established reputation and extensive integrations make it the smarter option for modern property management.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Cambridge PMS and Infor HMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cambridge PMS and Infor HMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Cambridge PMS offers 1 verified integration partners, while Infor HMS offers 113. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cambridge PMS: No. Infor HMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] has an HT Score of 0 and Infor has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor