The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 160 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] shines .
Preno shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 160 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 160 |
After analyzing 160 verified reviews, Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] users most value its , while Preno users highlight user-friendly interface, customer support, channel management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Application
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #13 80 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #32 15 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #46 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #39 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #14 65 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #12 53 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #21 17 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #8 26 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #27 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #25 13 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #20 3 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #13 2 reviews |
Choosing the right Property Management System (PMS) is crucial for your hotel's operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue growth. Both Cambridge PMS by Shiji and Preno aim to streamline your daily tasks, but they approach this goal differently. While Cambridge PMS offers a broad, enterprise-level solution, Preno provides a user-friendly, cloud-based platform with a focus on small to mid-sized hotels. Which one aligns best with your hotel's size, needs, and growth plans?
Cambridge PMS is a traditional, comprehensive solution favored for its depth and enterprise capabilities, but it lacks recent reviews and a more recent market presence. In contrast, Preno's recent surge in reviews—144 in the last six months—demonstrates its growing popularity among hoteliers, especially for its ease of use and support. Do your operational needs lean toward a long-established system or a modern, rapidly evolving platform?
Cambridge PMS is designed for large-scale operations and resorts, with a focus on detailed reporting and extensive customization, yet it struggles to garner reviews or recent feedback. Preno, on the other hand, receives high praise for its intuitive design, quick onboarding, and proactive customer support, making it a strong choice for properties seeking simplicity and efficiency. Are you prioritizing recent customer feedback or an established legacy system?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, robust PMS capable of managing complex operations across multiple locations, Cambridge PMS might seem appealing. However, with a rating of 0/5 and no recent reviews, it’s difficult to assess its current performance or user satisfaction. Preno’s high overall rating of 4.73/5, supported by 144 reviews, makes it a safer bet, especially for small to mid-sized hotels and boutique properties seeking ease of use.
If your team values a platform that’s quick to deploy, offers a broad array of features like integrated channel management, booking engine, and automation, Preno is the clear choice. Conversely, if you require a system tailored for large operations with deep customization—though unverified by recent reviews—Cambridge PMS might appeal, but its lack of recent user feedback is a concern.
Preno's interface scores a 4.78/5, with reviews emphasizing its simplicity, clean design, and quick onboarding process. Hoteliers praise Preno for its intuitive navigation, mobile accessibility, and responsive support, making staff adoption smoother.
Cambridge PMS scores a 0/5 in ease of use, with no recent reviews or user feedback available. Its complexity and lack of recent customer support data suggest it’s less accessible for everyday staff, especially those new to PMS technology.
Edge: Preno.
Preno offers 30 distinct features, including payment processing, online support, guest CRM, revenue management, automated night audits, and a booking engine—all designed to streamline operations and improve guest experiences. It also features a mobile app and integrations with major tools like Xero and SiteMinder.
Cambridge PMS, by comparison, has no listed features beyond basic management functions, and no recent updates or additions are available. Its limited feature set and absence of recent innovation make Preno’s comprehensive capabilities more attractive for hotels seeking modern functionality.
Edge: Preno.
Preno’s support receives a 4.8/5 rating, with recent reviews highlighting fast, friendly, and helpful service. Hoteliers mention that Preno’s team is proactive, responsive, and always ready to assist through support channels, especially during onboarding.
Cambridge PMS, with a 0/5 support rating and no recent reviews, offers no clear evidence of quality support. Its lack of recent customer feedback raises concerns about ongoing assistance and responsiveness.
Edge: Preno.
Preno integrates with 17 verified partners, including Xero, SiteMinder, Revinate, and TrustYou, covering accounting, channel management, guest feedback, and marketing. Its wide integration ecosystem supports seamless flow across your tech stack.
Cambridge PMS only has one verified partner, Duetto, limiting its integration options. For hotels relying on multiple tools, Preno’s broader compatibility makes it more adaptable to varying operational needs.
Edge: Preno.
Preno’s average review score of 4.73/5, based on 144 recent reviews, shows strong satisfaction among hoteliers. Its property segment focus—particularly boutique hotels and motels—reflects high ratings, with many users praising its ease of use and support.
Cambridge PMS, with a score of 0/5 and no recent reviews, cannot be reliably rated. Its lack of recent feedback makes Preno the preferred choice from a user satisfaction perspective.
Edge: Preno.
Cambridge PMS does not publicly disclose its pricing, and there are no indications of freemium or trial options. Its costs may vary based on enterprise needs, but lack of transparency makes budgeting difficult.
Preno charges a straightforward $800 monthly fee, with no mention of implementation or setup costs. Its transparent pricing model simplifies decision-making for small to mid-sized properties.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in their target audiences and recent activity. Preno is a cloud-based, user-friendly platform with a robust feature set, recent reviews, and high satisfaction ratings, making it ideal for most small to midsize properties. Cambridge PMS, by contrast, appears to be a legacy enterprise system with no recent reviews or evidence of active support, limiting its suitability for modern hotels.
If your hotel values a modern, easy-to-implement system with excellent support, Preno clearly stands out. For large, complex operations requiring deep customization—although unverified by current reviews—Cambridge PMS might still appeal, but the lack of recent feedback is a significant drawback.
In conclusion, for most hoteliers today, Preno’s recent review volume, high ratings, and feature breadth make it the safer, smarter choice. However, if your property’s complexity demands a more traditional enterprise solution and you can verify its ongoing support, Cambridge PMS could still fit your needs—but proceed cautiously.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Cambridge PMS and Preno share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Payment processing |
Showing top differences. 18 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during wee... The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during weekends or busy periods. Responsiveness and direct contact with support staff are valued highly.
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
Where hoteliers push back
Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better str... Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better strategic decision-making. Some users expressed a need for customized reporting features.
Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with... Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with offline functionality and more feature depth would improve usability, especially for managers on the go.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cambridge PMS and Preno share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Cambridge PMS offers 1 verified integration partners, while Preno offers 17. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Preno leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cambridge PMS: No. Preno: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] has an HT Score of 0 and Preno has 80. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor