The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 108 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] shines .
Planet shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like On premise and Revenue management module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 108 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 108 |
After analyzing 108 verified reviews, Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] users most value its , while Planet users highlight functionality and features, ease of use, multi-property management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Functionality and Features
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Multi-property Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
System Performance and Reliability
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #27 32 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 50 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 10 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #17 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #21 42 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #21 34 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #17 33 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #20 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #29 6 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #10 79 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #15 2 reviews |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is a pivotal decision for your hotel’s operational efficiency, revenue management, and guest experience. With Cambridge PMS by Shiji and protel PMS by Planet both vying for your attention, it’s crucial to understand their strengths and weaknesses side by side. While Cambridge PMS offers a scarce review footprint and no recent data, protel PMS boasts a strong, recent review presence and a robust feature set. Which one aligns best with your hotel’s needs?
Cambridge PMS by Shiji is essentially invisible in recent reviews, with zero ratings or feedback in the last six months. Conversely, protel PMS has over 105 reviews in the past six months, with a high overall rating of 4.11 out of 5 and an 80% likelihood to recommend. The recent reviews for protel highlight its reliability, extensive integrations, and user-friendly interface, making it the more credible choice today.
Both systems aim to streamline hotel operations—Cambridge PMS claims comprehensive property management, but its lack of recent reviews raises questions about ongoing support or development. protel PMS actively engages hoteliers with positive feedback, emphasizing its full-stack payment capability, extensive integrations, and flexible deployment options. Why should you rely on a product with no recent feedback when a well-reviewed alternative exists?
If your hotel needs a modern, cloud-native PMS with extensive third-party integrations, go with protel PMS. It’s best suited for hotels seeking a scalable, flexible solution with a large ecosystem supporting over 1,200 integrations, including booking engines, revenue management, and CRM tools. On the other hand, Cambridge PMS might be considered if your focus is on traditional property management, but it’s not currently supported by recent reviews or active development.
For hotels with multi-property management needs or those prioritizing integrated payments and automation, protel’s comprehensive feature set and recent positive reviews make it the clear choice. If your hotel is smaller or more traditional and prefers a less complex system, Cambridge’s limited information suggests it may not meet your evolving needs.
Review data indicates that protel PMS is highly rated for user experience, with a 4.12/5 ease of use score and recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and staff adoption. Conversely, Cambridge PMS’s UI and onboarding details are not available, and its zero review count suggests limited recent user feedback.
Based on current data, protel PMS’s straightforward onboarding process, clear interface, and positive support experiences give it a significant edge. If ease of implementation and staff training are priorities, edge: protel PMS.
Protel PMS offers a staggering 46 features, including on-premise and cloud deployment, revenue management, multi-currency and multi-lingual support, booking engine, guest CRM, real-time reporting, digital registration, and integrated payments. Cambridge PMS provides no specific features listed, and its limited review data implies minimal recent development or feature expansion.
While Cambridge claims to be comprehensive, the lack of feature details and recent updates places protel at the forefront. With more features, recent enhancements, and broad functionality, edge: protel PMS.
Customer reviews highlight that protel PMS’s support scores around 3.95/5, with recent feedback noting 24/7 multilingual assistance, quick response times, and proactive onboarding. Conversely, Cambridge PMS’s support ratings are unavailable, and the absence of recent reviews suggests support might be less responsive or active.
Given protel’s recent positive support feedback, it’s the safer choice if reliable, prompt assistance is critical to your hotel. Edge: protel PMS.
Protel PMS integrates with over 1,200 hospitality systems, including popular partners like Innspire, Right Revenue, and RevControl. It shares one partner with Cambridge PMS, which is Duetto, but Cambridge’s total integration count is just one verified partner, whereas protel’s ecosystem is vast.
This extensive ecosystem enables your hotel to connect with a broad array of tools, automation, and revenue solutions. Edge: protel PMS.
Since Cambridge PMS has no recent reviews, it cannot be reliably rated by hoteliers today. In contrast, protel PMS holds a 4.11/5 overall score with recent feedback emphasizing its usability, reliability, and integration capabilities.
Hotels across various segments, from boutique to resort hotels, rate protel highly, especially for its functionality and support. Edge: protel PMS.
Cambridge PMS does not list pricing details, indicating it may be custom-quoted or not openly marketed. protel PMS costs $500 monthly, with no free tier or trial, which is typical for a full-featured enterprise solution.
Pricing is transparent for protel, and its cost reflects extensive functionality and support. If budget transparency is key, consider protel’s clear pricing model; otherwise, more information is needed for Cambridge.
In essence, protel PMS is a complete, modern system with a proven track record, strong reviews, and a wide ecosystem supporting hospitality businesses globally. Cambridge PMS appears to be a traditional, less supported option, with no recent validation from user feedback or active updates, making it a risky choice for today's hotel operations.
If your hotel aims for growth, automation, and integration, protel PMS’s extensive features, recent reviews, and active support make it the clear leader. For smaller, simpler hotels with minimal needs, Cambridge might suffice, but its lack of recent validation suggests it’s not suitable for a future-proof operation.
In today’s competitive hotel landscape, relying on a well-reviewed, actively supported PMS like protel offers peace of mind and operational confidence.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Cambridge PMS and protel PMS (by Planet) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 34 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
What hoteliers love
Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management.... Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management. However, many reviews expressed disappointment that a lot of these functionalities are incomplete, buggy, or missing entirely when dealing with more complex setups or multi-property environments. Custom reports and seamless integration with other tools are also highlighted as beneficial.
The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the... The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the efficiency in managing daily operations. However, certain updates have made certain functions more complex and less intuitive than before.
Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfa... Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfaces, many found the system frustratingly limited for multi-location setups, highlighting significant bugs and reduced functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor resp... Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor response times after the acquisition by Planet. Users recommend improving the speed and reliability of customer service.
Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. H... Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. However, this flexibility often comes at a high cost, and some required features are only available through paid custom development.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cambridge PMS and protel PMS (by Planet) share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Cambridge PMS offers 1 verified integration partners, while protel PMS (by Planet) offers 194. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. protel PMS (by Planet) leads in ease of use at 4.1/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cambridge PMS: No. protel PMS (by Planet): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] has an HT Score of 0 and Planet has 33. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor